Chris Attoe1, Elizabeth Pounds-Cornish2. 1. Burns Unit, Ward 11, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP21 8AL, UK. Electronic address: chrisatts@aol.com. 2. Burns Unit and National Spinal Injuries Centre, Department of Clinical Psychology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP21 8AL, UK. Electronic address: Liz.poundscornish@buckshealthcare.nhs.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Burn care innovations have vastly reduced mortality rates and improved prognoses, fostering the need for multi-disciplinary input in holistic recovery. Consequently psychological and social considerations post-burn are included in National Burn Care Standards and have featured increasingly in burns literature. AIM: To identify the key findings of the rapidly expanding literature base for psychosocial adjustment post-burn, highlighting the most important knowledge and future directions for both practice and research. METHOD: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, BNI, HMIC databases were searched from January 2003 to September 2013 using search terms regarding psychosocial adjustment post-burn. After exclusions 24 papers underwent critical appraisal. RESULTS: Studies were categorised by the element of adjustment that they examined; psychopathology, quality of life, return to work, interpersonal, post-traumatic growth. Strengths, weaknesses, and significant findings within each category were presented. DISCUSSION: Although psychopathology and quality of life were well-researched compared to other categories, all would benefit from methodological improvements such as sample size or dropout rates. Coping strategies, premorbid psychopathology, and personality consistently featured as predictors of adjustment, although research should now move from identifying predictors, to clarifying the concept and parameters of psychosocial adjustment while developing and evaluating interventions to improve outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Burn care innovations have vastly reduced mortality rates and improved prognoses, fostering the need for multi-disciplinary input in holistic recovery. Consequently psychological and social considerations post-burn are included in National Burn Care Standards and have featured increasingly in burns literature. AIM: To identify the key findings of the rapidly expanding literature base for psychosocial adjustment post-burn, highlighting the most important knowledge and future directions for both practice and research. METHOD: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, BNI, HMIC databases were searched from January 2003 to September 2013 using search terms regarding psychosocial adjustment post-burn. After exclusions 24 papers underwent critical appraisal. RESULTS: Studies were categorised by the element of adjustment that they examined; psychopathology, quality of life, return to work, interpersonal, post-traumatic growth. Strengths, weaknesses, and significant findings within each category were presented. DISCUSSION: Although psychopathology and quality of life were well-researched compared to other categories, all would benefit from methodological improvements such as sample size or dropout rates. Coping strategies, premorbid psychopathology, and personality consistently featured as predictors of adjustment, although research should now move from identifying predictors, to clarifying the concept and parameters of psychosocial adjustment while developing and evaluating interventions to improve outcomes.
Authors: Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Audrey E Wolfe; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: Burns Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Sara Cartwright; Cayla Saret; Gabriel D Shapiro; Pengsheng Ni; Robert L Sheridan; Austin F Lee; Molly Marino; Amy Acton; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan Journal: Burns Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.609
Authors: Cayla J Saret; Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 1.819
Authors: J Goverman; K Mathews; D Nadler; E Henderson; K McMullen; D Herndon; W Meyer; J A Fauerbach; S Wiechman; G Carrougher; C M Ryan; J C Schneider Journal: Burns Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 2.609
Authors: Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Laura C Simko; Emily Dore; Mary D Slavin; Cayla Saret; Flor Amaya; J Lomelin-Gascon; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 1.819