Literature DB >> 26359480

Irrigated Needle Ablation Creates Larger and More Transmural Ventricular Lesions Compared With Standard Unipolar Ablation in an Ovine Model.

Benjamin Berte1, Hubert Cochet1, Julie Magat1, Jérôme Naulin1, Daniele Ghidoli1, Xavier Pillois1, Frédéric Casassus1, Seigo Yamashita1, Saagar Mahida1, Nicolas Derval1, Mélèze Hocini1, Bruno Quesson1, Olivier Bernus1, Rukshen Weerasooriya1, Michel Haïssaguerre1, Frédéric Sacher1, Pierre Jaïs2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia recurrence can occur after ventricular tachycardia ablation because of incomplete and nontransmural ventricular lesion formation. We sought to compare the lesions made by a novel irrigated needle catheter to conventional radiofrequency lesions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirteen female sheep (4.6±0.7 years, 54±8 kg) were studied. In 7 sheep, 60-s radiofrequency applications were performed using an irrigated needle catheter. In 6 sheep, conventional lesions were made using a 4-mm irrigated catheter. 1.5T in vivo and high-density magnetic resonance imaging (9.4T) were performed on explanted hearts from animals receiving needle radiofrequency. Conventional lesion volume was calculated as (1/6)×π×(A×B(2)+C×D(2)/2). Needle lesion volume was measured as Σ(π×r(2))/2 with a slice thickness of 1 mm. The dimensions of all lesions were also measured on gross pathology. Additional histological analysis of the needle lesions was performed. One hundred twenty endocardial left ventricular ablation lesions (conventional, n=60; needle, n=60) were created. At necropsy, more lesions were found using needle versus conventional radiofrequency (90% versus 75%; P<0.05). Comparing needle versus conventional radiofrequency: lesion volume was larger (1030±362 versus 488±384 mm(3); P<0.001), lesion depth was increased (9.9±2.7 versus 5±2.4 mm; P<0.001), and more transmural lesions were created (62.5% versus 17%; P<0.01). Pericardial contrast injection was observed in 4 apical attempts using needle radiofrequency, however, with no adverse effects. Steam pops occurred in 3 attempts using conventional radiofrequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Irrigated needle ablation is associated with more frequent, larger, deeper, and more often transmural lesions compared with conventional irrigated ablation. This technology might be of value to treat intramural or epicardial ventricular tachycardia substrates resistant to conventional ablation.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation techniques; arrhythmias, cardiac; catheter ablation; magnetic resonance imaging; model; s, animal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26359480     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  6 in total

1.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  The year in cardiology 2015: arrhythmias and device therapy.

Authors:  Jan Steffel; Pierre Jais; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Innovations in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Challenges and Upcoming Solutions in 2018 and Beyond.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Alan Sugure; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Development of a Shock-Wave Catheter Ablation System for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Validation Study in Pigs In Vivo.

Authors:  Susumu Morosawa; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Michinori Hirano; Hirokazu Amamizu; Hironori Uzuka; Kazuma Ohyama; Yuhi Hasebe; Makoto Nakano; Koji Fukuda; Kazuyoshi Takayama; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Kenji Okubo; Lorenzo Gigli; Paolo Della Bella
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-08-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.