Literature DB >> 26358989

Strong spatial segregation between wildcats and domestic cats may explain low hybridization rates on the Iberian Peninsula.

J M Gil-Sánchez1, J Jaramillo2, J M Barea-Azcón2.   

Abstract

The European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) is an endangered felid impacted by genetic introgression with the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). The problem of hybridization has had different effects in different areas. In non-Mediterranean regions pure forms of wildcats became almost extinct, while in Mediterranean regions genetic introgression is a rare phenomenon. The study of the potential factors that prevent the gene flow in areas of lower hybridization may be key to wildcat conservation. We studied the population size and spatial segregation of wildcats and domestic cats in a typical Mediterranean area of ancient sympatry, where no evidence of hybridization had been detected by genetic studies. Camera trapping of wild-living cats and walking surveys of stray cats in villages were used for capture-recapture estimations of abundance and spatial segregation. Results showed (i) a low density of wildcats and no apparent presence of putative hybrids; (ii) a very low abundance of feral cats in spite of the widespread and large population sources of domestic cats inhabiting villages; (iii) strong spatial segregation between wildcats and domestic/feral cats; and (iv) no relationship between the size of the potential population sources and the abundance of feral cats. Hence, domestic cats were limited in their ability to become integrated into the local habitat of wildcats. Ecological barriers (habitat preferences, food limitations, intra-specific and intra-guild competition, predation) may explain the severe divergences of hybridization impact observed at a biogeographic level. This has a direct effect on key conservation strategies for wildcats (i.e., control of domestic cats).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological barriers; Felis silvestris; Genetic introgression; Interspecific hybridization; Wildcat conservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358989     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  Low rates of hybridization between European wildcats and domestic cats in a human-dominated landscape.

Authors:  Katharina Steyer; Annika Tiesmeyer; Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes; Carsten Nowak
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Fragmentation and low density as major conservation challenges for the southernmost populations of the European wildcat.

Authors:  Jose María Gil-Sánchez; Jose Miguel Barea-Azcón; Javier Jaramillo; F Javier Herrera-Sánchez; José Jiménez; Emilio Virgós
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessing Risks to Wildlife from Free-Roaming Hybrid Cats: The Proposed Introduction of Pet Savannah Cats to Australia as a Case Study.

Authors:  Christopher R Dickman; Sarah M Legge; John C Z Woinarski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Human impact on the recent population history of the elusive European wildcat inferred from whole genome data.

Authors:  María Esther Nieto-Blázquez; Dennis Schreiber; Sarah A Mueller; Katrin Koch; Carsten Nowak; Markus Pfenninger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 4.547

5.  Widespread introgression of mountain hare genes into Fennoscandian brown hare populations.

Authors:  Riikka Levänen; Carl-Gustaf Thulin; Göran Spong; Jaakko L O Pohjoismäki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Females know better: Sex-biased habitat selection by the European wildcat.

Authors:  Teresa Oliveira; Fermín Urra; José María López-Martín; Elena Ballesteros-Duperón; José Miguel Barea-Azcón; Marcos Moléon; José María Gil-Sánchez; Paulo Celio Alves; Francisco Díaz-Ruíz; Pablo Ferreras; Pedro Monterroso
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.