Literature DB >> 26358840

13C metabolic flux analysis at a genome-scale.

Saratram Gopalakrishnan1, Costas D Maranas2.   

Abstract

Metabolic models used in 13C metabolic flux analysis generally include a limited number of reactions primarily from central metabolism. They typically omit degradation pathways, complete cofactor balances, and atom transition contributions for reactions outside central metabolism. This study addresses the impact on prediction fidelity of scaling-up mapping models to a genome-scale. The core mapping model employed in this study accounts for (75 reactions and 65 metabolites) primarily from central metabolism. The genome-scale metabolic mapping model (GSMM) (697 reaction and 595 metabolites) is constructed using as a basis the iAF1260 model upon eliminating reactions guaranteed not to carry flux based on growth and fermentation data for a minimal glucose growth medium. Labeling data for 17 amino acid fragments obtained from cells fed with glucose labeled at the second carbon was used to obtain fluxes and ranges. Metabolic fluxes and confidence intervals are estimated, for both core and genome-scale mapping models, by minimizing the sum of square of differences between predicted and experimentally measured labeling patterns using the EMU decomposition algorithm. Overall, we find that both topology and estimated values of the metabolic fluxes remain largely consistent between core and GSM model. Stepping up to a genome-scale mapping model leads to wider flux inference ranges for 20 key reactions present in the core model. The glycolysis flux range doubles due to the possibility of active gluconeogenesis, the TCA flux range expanded by 80% due to the availability of a bypass through arginine consistent with labeling data, and the transhydrogenase reaction flux was essentially unresolved due to the presence of as many as five routes for the inter-conversion of NADPH to NADH afforded by the genome-scale model. By globally accounting for ATP demands in the GSMM model the unused ATP decreased drastically with the lower bound matching the maintenance ATP requirement. A non-zero flux for the arginine degradation pathway was identified to meet biomass precursor demands as detailed in the iAF1260 model. Inferred ranges for 81% of the reactions in the genome-scale metabolic (GSM) model varied less than one-tenth of the basis glucose uptake rate (95% confidence test). This is because as many as 411 reactions in the GSM are growth coupled meaning that the single measurement of biomass formation rate locks the reaction flux values. This implies that accurate biomass formation rate and composition are critical for resolving metabolic fluxes away from central metabolism and suggests the importance of biomass composition (re)assessment under different genetic and environmental backgrounds. In addition, the loss of information associated with mapping fluxes from MFA on a core model to a GSM model is quantified.
Copyright © 2015 International Metabolic Engineering Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. coli; EMU algorithm; Genome-scale; Metabolic flux analysis; Metabolic network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358840     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Eng        ISSN: 1096-7176            Impact factor:   9.783


  21 in total

1.  Genome-Scale Fluxome of Synechococcus elongatus UTEX 2973 Using Transient 13C-Labeling Data.

Authors:  John I Hendry; Saratram Gopalakrishnan; Justin Ungerer; Himadri B Pakrasi; Yinjie J Tang; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Estimation of flux ratios without uptake or release data: Application to serine and methionine metabolism.

Authors:  Roland Nilsson; Irena Roci; Jeramie Watrous; Mohit Jain
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 3.  Understanding metabolism with flux analysis: From theory to application.

Authors:  Ziwei Dai; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 9.783

4.  High-resolution 13C metabolic flux analysis.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Integrative metabolic flux analysis reveals an indispensable dimension of phenotypes.

Authors:  Richard C Law; Aliya Lakhani; Samantha O'Keeffe; Sevcan Erşan; Junyoung O Park
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.279

Review 6.  Achieving Metabolic Flux Analysis for S. cerevisiae at a Genome-Scale: Challenges, Requirements, and Considerations.

Authors:  Saratram Gopalakrishnan; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2015-09-18

7.  13C Metabolic Flux Analysis for Systematic Metabolic Engineering of S. cerevisiae for Overproduction of Fatty Acids.

Authors:  Amit Ghosh; David Ando; Jennifer Gin; Weerawat Runguphan; Charles Denby; George Wang; Edward E K Baidoo; Chris Shymansky; Jay D Keasling; Héctor García Martín
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-05

8.  A genome-scale Escherichia coli kinetic metabolic model k-ecoli457 satisfying flux data for multiple mutant strains.

Authors:  Ali Khodayari; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Integration and Validation of the Genome-Scale Metabolic Models of Pichia pastoris: A Comprehensive Update of Protein Glycosylation Pathways, Lipid and Energy Metabolism.

Authors:  Màrius Tomàs-Gamisans; Pau Ferrer; Joan Albiol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  SUMOFLUX: A Generalized Method for Targeted 13C Metabolic Flux Ratio Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Kogadeeva; Nicola Zamboni
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.