Literature DB >> 26358479

Temperature Prediction Model for Bone Drilling Based on Density Distribution and In Vivo Experiments for Minimally Invasive Robotic Cochlear Implantation.

Arne Feldmann1, Juan Anso2, Brett Bell2, Tom Williamson2, Kate Gavaghan2, Nicolas Gerber2, Helene Rohrbach3, Stefan Weber2, Philippe Zysset4.   

Abstract

Surgical robots have been proposed ex vivo to drill precise holes in the temporal bone for minimally invasive cochlear implantation. The main risk of the procedure is damage of the facial nerve due to mechanical interaction or due to temperature elevation during the drilling process. To evaluate the thermal risk of the drilling process, a simplified model is proposed which aims to enable an assessment of risk posed to the facial nerve for a given set of constant process parameters for different mastoid bone densities. The model uses the bone density distribution along the drilling trajectory in the mastoid bone to calculate a time dependent heat production function at the tip of the drill bit. Using a time dependent moving point source Green's function, the heat equation can be solved at a certain point in space so that the resulting temperatures can be calculated over time. The model was calibrated and initially verified with in vivo temperature data. The data was collected in minimally invasive robotic drilling of 12 holes in four different sheep. The sheep were anesthetized and the temperature elevations were measured with a thermocouple which was inserted in a previously drilled hole next to the planned drilling trajectory. Bone density distributions were extracted from pre-operative CT data by averaging Hounsfield values over the drill bit diameter. Post-operative [Formula: see text]CT data was used to verify the drilling accuracy of the trajectories. The comparison of measured and calculated temperatures shows a very good match for both heating and cooling phases. The average prediction error of the maximum temperature was less than 0.7 °C and the average root mean square error was approximately 0.5 °C. To analyze potential thermal damage, the model was used to calculate temperature profiles and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C at a minimal distance to the facial nerve. For the selected drilling parameters, temperature elevation profiles and cumulative equivalent minutes suggest that thermal elevation of this minimally invasive cochlear implantation surgery may pose a risk to the facial nerve, especially in sclerotic or high density mastoid bones. Optimized drilling parameters need to be evaluated and the model could be used for future risk evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone drilling; Cumulative equivalent minutes; In-vivo experimental study; Minimally invasive cochlear implantation; Robotic surgery; Thermal model for bone drilling; Thermal nerve damage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358479     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1450-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  5 in total

1.  Making Robots Mill Bone More Like Human Surgeons: Using Bone Density and Anatomic Information to Mill Safely and Efficiently.

Authors:  Neal P Dillon; Loris Fichera; Patrick S Wellborn; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster
Journal:  Rep U S       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Pre-operative Screening and Manual Drilling Strategies to Reduce the Risk of Thermal Injury During Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  Neal P Dillon; Loris Fichera; Kyle Kesler; M Geraldine Zuniga; Jason E Mitchell; Robert J Webster; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Safety margins in robotic bone milling: from registration uncertainty to statistically safe surgeries.

Authors:  Michael A Siebold; Neal P Dillon; Loris Fichera; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  A worthy technique for transcanal drilling during endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Sheikh Shawkat Kamal
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-18

5.  Instrument flight to the inner ear.

Authors:  S Weber; K Gavaghan; W Wimmer; T Williamson; N Gerber; J Anso; B Bell; A Feldmann; C Rathgeb; M Matulic; M Stebinger; D Schneider; G Mantokoudis; O Scheidegger; F Wagner; M Kompis; M Caversaccio
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2017-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.