Literature DB >> 26358330

EUS-guided portal injection chemotherapy for treatment of hepatic metastases: feasibility in the acute porcine model.

Douglas O Faigel1, Douglas F Lake2, Tracy L Landreth3, Catherine C Kelman3, Ronald J Marler4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Direct injection of chemotherapy into the portal vein for treatment of liver metastases may increase hepatic tissue levels while decreasing systemic levels and toxicities. We aimed to evaluate EUS-guided portal injection chemotherapy (EPIC) by using drug-eluting microbeads or nanoparticles and compare it with systemic injection.
METHODS: We conducted a comparative feasibility trial in the acute porcine model (24 anesthetized pigs). Pigs were treated with irinotecan, doxorubicin, or albumin-bound paclitaxel nanoparticles (n = 8/group). Within each group, pigs were treated with EPIC or a systemic intravenous injection of drug and saline solution into the portal vein (n = 4/treatment). Irinotecan or doxorubicin were loaded onto microbeads for EPIC treatment only. We examined drug levels in tissue (1 hour) and plasma (15 minutes).
RESULTS: EUS-guided access and injection was successful in all animals. EPIC with irinotecan-loaded microbeads showed nearly double the hepatic concentration compared with systemic injection (6242 vs 3692 ng/g) and almost half the systemic levels. EPIC with doxorubicin-loaded microbeads showed a 5-fold increase in hepatic levels (35,450 vs 6930 ng/g) and a 30-fold decrease in cardiac levels (153 vs 4805 ng/g) compared with systemic administration (P < .05 for both). EPIC with albumin-bound paclitaxel nanoparticles increased hepatic concentrations by 60% and decreased systemic levels by 24% to 32%.
CONCLUSIONS: EPIC holds promise as a new treatment for hepatic metastases.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358330     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

Review 1.  Review of current and evolving clinical indications for endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Anjuli K Luthra; John A Evans
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in vascular interventions: Where are we now?

Authors:  Alessandro Fugazza; Kareem Khalaf; Matteo Colombo; Silvia Carrara; Marco Spadaccini; Glenn Koleth; Edoardo Troncone; Roberta Maselli; Alessandro Repici; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  EUS-guided vascular interventions.

Authors:  Idan Levy; Kenneth F Binmoeller
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 4.  Insights into the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular therapy.

Authors:  Roberto Oleas; Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-09-29

Review 5.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in anticancer therapy: Current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Andre Bratanic; Dorotea Bozic; Antonio Mestrovic; Dinko Martinovic; Marko Kumric; Tina Ticinovic Kurir; Josko Bozic
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the field of hepatology: Recent advances and future trends.

Authors:  Jahnvi Dhar; Jayanta Samanta
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 7.  The Role of Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Diseases: What Have We Learnt?

Authors:  Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Maria Satya Paramitha; Rino A Gani
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.