| Literature DB >> 26358284 |
Jeffrey I Campbell1, Nir Eyal2, Angella Musiimenta3, Jessica E Haberer4,5.
Abstract
Electronic adherence monitors (EAMs) record and report an array of health behaviors, ranging from taking daily medications to wearing medical devices. EAMs are utilized in research worldwide and are being investigated for clinical use. However, there is also growing popular concern about the extent to which electronic devices may be used to monitor individuals, including allegations in the media that EAMs represent a move towards "Big Brother" in medicine. Here, we highlight the unique benefits as well as the potential ethical challenges that electronic adherence monitoring generates. These challenges surround autonomy, privacy and confidentiality, trust, and ancillary care obligations. We describe key questions within each of these domains that warrant further investigation, and present potential solutions to many of the concerns raised.Keywords: confidentiality; electronic adherence monitoring; patient adherence; personal autonomy; privacy; research ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26358284 PMCID: PMC4762813 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3502-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Intern Med ISSN: 0884-8734 Impact factor: 5.128