| Literature DB >> 26357485 |
Maria Thereza Micussi1, Rodrigo Pegado Freitas1, Priscylla Helouyse Angelo2, Elvira Maria Soares3, Telma Maria Lemos4, Técia Maria Maranhão5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) in women with insulin resistance (IR) using surface electromyography and to associate the results with insulin levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through an analytical, cross-sectional study, 86 women were evaluated and divided into two groups: a control group (n=35) and an IR group (n=51). Data were collected through detailed history-taking, physical examination, and biochemical analysis. Fasting insulin levels were used for diagnosing IR. Electromyography of the PFMs was used for analyzing the tone and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The measures of central tendency and linear regression models were used.Entities:
Keywords: electromyography; maximal voluntary contraction; menstrual cycle; tone; woman
Year: 2015 PMID: 26357485 PMCID: PMC4559236 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S85816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Clinical and hormonal characteristics of the patients
| Variable | IR (n=51) | Control (n=35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 25.3±4.5 | 27.2±4.4 | >0.05 |
| Age of menarche (years) | 14.4±2.6 | 14.3±3.1 | >0.05 |
| Weight (kg) | 75.6±17.6 | 51.8±4.9 | 0.04 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.1±5.7 | 20.9±2.4 | <0.001 |
| Normal | 21.2% | 100% | |
| Overweight | 24.2% | 0% | |
| Obese | 54.6% | 0% | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 90.3±14.8 | 73.4±5.4 | <0.001 |
| TSH (µU/mL) | 2.3±1.8 | 1.44±0.8 | >0.05 |
| Fasting glucose | 94.5±6.3 | 71.8±4.1 | 0.03 |
| Fasting insulin | 19.7±6.6 | 5.4±1.8 | <0.001 |
Note:
Significant difference with Student’s t-test.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IR, insulin resistance; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Data regarding electromyographic activity in women with and without IR
| Group | IR group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tone (µV) | 13.4±3.4 | 25.1±3.3 | <0.0001 |
| MVC (µV) | 47.6±4.5 | 64.3±5.0 | <0.0001 |
Note:
Significant difference with Student’s t-test.
Abbreviations: IR, insulin resistance; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction.
Results of association analysis using the insulin levels as dependent variable
| Independent variables | Adjusted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tone (µV) | −0.685 | −0.047 | −0.025 | 0.866 | 0.759 | 0.732 |
| MVC (µV) | −0.687 | 0.397 | −0.270 | 0.047 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 0.637 | −0.168 | −0.414 | 0.017 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.613 | −0.067 | −0.064 | 0.601 | ||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 0.839 | 0.490 | 1.024 | 0.000 |
Notes:
Significant difference with P<0.05 using Pearson correlation (R);
significant difference with P<0.05 using linear regression (R2) models.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction.