Literature DB >> 26356865

Similarity Measures for Comparing Biclusterings.

Danilo Horta, Ricardo J G B Campello.   

Abstract

The comparison of ordinary partitions of a set of objects is well established in the clustering literature, which comprehends several studies on the analysis of the properties of similarity measures for comparing partitions. However, similarity measures for clusterings are not readily applicable to biclusterings, since each bicluster is a tuple of two sets (of rows and columns), whereas a cluster is only a single set (of rows). Some biclustering similarity measures have been defined as minor contributions in papers which primarily report on proposals and evaluation of biclustering algorithms or comparative analyses of biclustering algorithms. The consequence is that some desirable properties of such measures have been overlooked in the literature. We review 14 biclustering similarity measures. We define eight desirable properties of a biclustering measure, discuss their importance, and prove which properties each of the reviewed measures has. We show examples drawn and inspired from important studies in which several biclustering measures convey misleading evaluations due to the absence of one or more of the discussed properties. We also advocate the use of a more general comparison approach that is based on the idea of transforming the original problem of comparing biclusterings into an equivalent problem of comparing clustering partitions with overlapping clusters.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26356865     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2014.2325016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

1.  Biclustering fMRI time series: a comparative study.

Authors:  Eduardo N Castanho; Helena Aidos; Sara C Madeira
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Comparison of sparse biclustering algorithms for gene expression datasets.

Authors:  Kath Nicholls; Chris Wallace
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  A systematic comparative evaluation of biclustering techniques.

Authors:  Victor A Padilha; Ricardo J G B Campello
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Scalable biclustering - the future of big data exploration?

Authors:  Patryk Orzechowski; Krzysztof Boryczko; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Bayesian biclustering by dynamics: Algorithm testing, comparison against random agglomeration, and calculation of application specific prior information.

Authors:  Helen Pinto; Ian Gates; Xin Wang
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  G-Tric: generating three-way synthetic datasets with triclustering solutions.

Authors:  João Lobo; Rui Henriques; Sara C Madeira
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.