BACKGROUND: After stroke, impairment of the upper and lower limb can limit patients' motor function and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Physiotherapy (PT) is an established clinical practice for stroke patients, playing an important role in improving limb function. Recently, several randomized trials have evaluated the effect of higher-intensity physiotherapy (increased duration and/or frequency) on patients' functional ability. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to investigate whether an increased intensity of PT after stroke results in better outcomes for patients. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on June 7, 2013, for English-language randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2003, to June 7, 2013. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Embase, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EBM Reviews were searched. REVIEW METHODS: We reviewed the full text of articles that compared 2 or more levels of PT intensity. Outcomes of interest included motor function, ADL, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: High-quality evidence showed that higher-intensity upper-limb PT and higher-intensity lower-limb PT both resulted in significantly greater improvements in motor function. Moderate-quality evidence showed that higher-intensity general PT did not. Moderate-quality evidence showed a significant improvement in ADL performance with higher-intensity upper-limb PT, but no improvement with higher-intensity general PT; no studies reported on ADL outcomes on lower-limb PT specifically. According to moderate-quality evidence, patient QOL did not change significantly after increased intensity of upper-limb, lower-limb, or general PT. When considering the results, one difference should be noted: Compared with the studies examining upper- and lower-limb PT, the studies examining general PT looked at a smaller increase-2 hours or less of additional therapy per week. LIMITATIONS: This analysis is limited to the earlier post-stroke phase and is not equipped to comment on expected outcomes of later-stage PT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this analysis found support for the use of more intensive PT to improve motor function and ability to perform ADL after stroke.
BACKGROUND: After stroke, impairment of the upper and lower limb can limit patients' motor function and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Physiotherapy (PT) is an established clinical practice for strokepatients, playing an important role in improving limb function. Recently, several randomized trials have evaluated the effect of higher-intensity physiotherapy (increased duration and/or frequency) on patients' functional ability. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to investigate whether an increased intensity of PT after stroke results in better outcomes for patients. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on June 7, 2013, for English-language randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2003, to June 7, 2013. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Embase, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EBM Reviews were searched. REVIEW METHODS: We reviewed the full text of articles that compared 2 or more levels of PT intensity. Outcomes of interest included motor function, ADL, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: High-quality evidence showed that higher-intensity upper-limb PT and higher-intensity lower-limb PT both resulted in significantly greater improvements in motor function. Moderate-quality evidence showed that higher-intensity general PT did not. Moderate-quality evidence showed a significant improvement in ADL performance with higher-intensity upper-limb PT, but no improvement with higher-intensity general PT; no studies reported on ADL outcomes on lower-limb PT specifically. According to moderate-quality evidence, patient QOL did not change significantly after increased intensity of upper-limb, lower-limb, or general PT. When considering the results, one difference should be noted: Compared with the studies examining upper- and lower-limb PT, the studies examining general PT looked at a smaller increase-2 hours or less of additional therapy per week. LIMITATIONS: This analysis is limited to the earlier post-stroke phase and is not equipped to comment on expected outcomes of later-stage PT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this analysis found support for the use of more intensive PT to improve motor function and ability to perform ADL after stroke.
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carolee J Winstein; Dorian K Rose; Sylvia M Tan; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Helena C Chui; Stanley P Azen Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: A Hejčl; K Jiránková; A Malucelli; A Sejkorová; T Radovnický; R Bartoš; M Orlický; Š Brušáková; K Hrach; J Kastnerová; M Sameš Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Cherry Kilbride; Daniel J M Scott; Tom Butcher; Meriel Norris; Jennifer M Ryan; Nana Anokye; Alyson Warland; Karen Baker; Dimitrios A Athanasiou; Guillem Singla-Buxarrais; Alexander Nowicky Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 2.692