Literature DB >> 26355988

Accurate Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Volumetrically Assess Bone Grafting in Alveolar Cleft Patients.

Wei-na Zhou1, Yan-bin Xu, Hong-bing Jiang, Linzhong Wan, Yi-fei Du.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess the volume of bone graft in alveolar cleft patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients of unilateral alveolar cleft were included in this study. All patients were taken CBCT preoperative and 1 week postoperative. The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files were imported into Simplant software and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the alveolar defect was achieved. With 3D volumetric measurements module, the volume of alveolar cleft was calculated preoperatively. During operation, the syringe compression method was adopted to calculate the actual amount of bone graft. One week postoperative, CBCT scan was performed again to measure the bone volume grafted to the defect. The volumetric ratio of the syringe compression method to preoperative CBCT assessment and the volume difference between syringe compression method and postoperative CBCT assessment were analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT measurement.
RESULTS: The 3D structure of the alveolar cleft and the boundary of bone graft was clear from CBCT images. The estimated volume of alveolar cleft by preoperative CBCT scans was 1.06 ± 0.09 cm, and the actual amount of bone graft determined by the syringe compression method was 1.51 ± 0.12 cm. The ratio between the latter to the former was 1.43 ± 0.07. The calculated volume of bone graft by 1-week postoperative CBCT scans was 1.53 ± 0.11 cm, with no significant difference compared with the actual amount of bone graft (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT was an accurate measurement to calculate the volume of alveolar defect and bone graft in alveolar cleft patients. Preoperative scans could aid in quantitatively determining the bone amount needed to adequately fill the bone defect, and the postoperative scans give accurate follow-up evaluation after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26355988     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Correlation between alveolar cleft morphology and the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting for unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Xinlei Yu; Yiping Huang; Weiran Li
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Bone Volume Estimation Using OsiriX Software in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Anuraj Singh Kochhar; Maninder Singh Sidhu; Mona Prabhakar; Ritasha Bhasin; Gulsheen Kaur Kochhar; Himanshu Dadlani; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Viral Vijay Mehta
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22

3.  Evaluation of Long-term Stability of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafts in Cleft Palate Patients Using Multislice Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Printed Models: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Venkatesh Palankar; Atul Sattur; Aditi Palankar; S Raja Rajeswari; Srinath Thakur; Anil Kumar Desai
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Block iliac bone grafting enhances osseous healing of alveolar reconstruction in older cleft patients: A radiological and histological evaluation.

Authors:  Y Du; W Zhou; Y Pan; Y Tang; L Wan; H Jiang
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-03-01

5.  Comparative Volume Analysis of Alveolar Defects by 3D Simulation.

Authors:  Pang-Yun Chou; Rafael Denadai; Rami R Hallac; Sarayuth Dumrongwongsiri; Wei-Chuan Hsieh; Betty Cj Pai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.