BACKGROUND: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a brief episode of dysfunction in a confined area of the brain. The risk of stroke following TIA is approximately 4% within the first 2 days and 9% within the first month. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is critical to reduce mortality and risk of stroke in patients who have experienced a TIA. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of the urgent evaluation and initiation of treatment of patients with TIA on the risk of subsequent stroke and death. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed for studies published from January 1, 2007, until December 21, 2012. The search was updated monthly to April 1, 2013. RESULTS: All identified studies showed that urgent assessment and initiation of treatment of TIA is an effective strategy in reducing the incidence of stroke. Among these, a large observational study found a large effect in that the risk of stroke was reduced by 80%, and a Canadian study found that providing urgent care significantly reduced the rate of stroke in high-risk patients. Another Canadian study reported a significant reduction in the rate of death among patients referred to stroke prevention clinics, compared to patients not referred to such services. One study showed that patients discharged from an emergency department with standard care had significantly higher rates of stroke and subsequent TIA in the first month, compared to those who were hospitalized. However, another study showed that for patients at low to moderate risk, rate of stroke was similar between inpatients and those managed in a TIA clinic. LIMITATIONS: Our analysis was restricted to the effect of the combined interventions. The magnitude of benefit of each individual component of the intervention cannot be determined through this review. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review have important clinical and health system implications. Urgent management of TIA patients in specialized TIA clinics rather than regular practice results in a lower rate of stroke and disability.
BACKGROUND: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a brief episode of dysfunction in a confined area of the brain. The risk of stroke following TIA is approximately 4% within the first 2 days and 9% within the first month. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is critical to reduce mortality and risk of stroke in patients who have experienced a TIA. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of the urgent evaluation and initiation of treatment of patients with TIA on the risk of subsequent stroke and death. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed for studies published from January 1, 2007, until December 21, 2012. The search was updated monthly to April 1, 2013. RESULTS: All identified studies showed that urgent assessment and initiation of treatment of TIA is an effective strategy in reducing the incidence of stroke. Among these, a large observational study found a large effect in that the risk of stroke was reduced by 80%, and a Canadian study found that providing urgent care significantly reduced the rate of stroke in high-risk patients. Another Canadian study reported a significant reduction in the rate of death among patients referred to stroke prevention clinics, compared to patients not referred to such services. One study showed that patients discharged from an emergency department with standard care had significantly higher rates of stroke and subsequent TIA in the first month, compared to those who were hospitalized. However, another study showed that for patients at low to moderate risk, rate of stroke was similar between inpatients and those managed in a TIA clinic. LIMITATIONS: Our analysis was restricted to the effect of the combined interventions. The magnitude of benefit of each individual component of the intervention cannot be determined through this review. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review have important clinical and health system implications. Urgent management of TIA patients in specialized TIA clinics rather than regular practice results in a lower rate of stroke and disability.
Authors: F Purroy; P E Jiménez-Caballero; G Mauri-Capdevila; M J Torres; A Gorospe; J M Ramírez Moreno; N P de la Ossa; D Cánovas; J Arenillas; J Alvarez-Sabín; P Martínez Sánchez; B Fuentes; R Delgado-Mederos; J Martí-Fàbregas; A Rodríguez Campello; J Masjuán Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Jason Wasserman; Jeff Perry; Dar Dowlatshahi; Grant Stotts; Ian Stiell; Jane Sutherland; Cheryl Symington; Mukul Sharma Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael A Ross; Scott Compton; Patrick Medado; Maureen Fitzgerald; Philip Kilanowski; Brian J O'Neil Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Caren M Wu; Braden J Manns; Michael D Hill; William A Ghali; Cam Donaldson; Alastair M Buchan Journal: Can J Neurol Sci Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: M M Martínez-Martínez; P Martínez-Sánchez; B Fuentes; R Cazorla-García; G Ruiz-Ares; E Correas-Callero; M Lara-Lara; E Díez-Tejedor Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: S Claiborne Johnston; Peter M Rothwell; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Matthew F Giles; Jacob S Elkins; Allan L Bernstein; Stephen Sidney Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Martin Wawruch; Dusan Zatko; Gejza Wimmer; Jan Luha; Sona Wimmerova; Petra Matalova; Peter Kukumberg; Jan Murin; Tomas Tesar; Beata Havelkova; Rashmi Shah Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Edel Burton; Johnny Aladkhen; Cathal O'Donnell; Siobhán Masterson; Aine Merwick; Vera Jc McCarthy; Patricia M Kearney; Claire M Buckley Journal: HRB Open Res Date: 2022-06-22