Literature DB >> 26355515

Detecting Differentially Coexpressed Genes from Labeled Expression Data: A Brief Review.

Mitsunori Kayano, Motoki Shiga, Hiroshi Mamitsuka.   

Abstract

We review methods for capturing differential coexpression, which can be divided into two cases by the size of gene sets: 1) two paired genes and 2) multiple genes. In the first case, two genes are positively and negatively correlated with each other under one and the other conditions, respectively. In the second case, multiple genes are coexpressed and randomly expressed under one and the other conditions, respectively. We summarize a variety of methods for the first and second cases into four and three approaches, respectively. We describe each of these approaches in detail technically, being followed by thorough comparative experiments with both synthetic and real data sets. Our experimental results imply high possibility of improving the efficiency of the current methods, particularly in the case of multiple genes, because of low performance achieved by the best methods which are relatively simple intuitive ones.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26355515     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.2297921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  10 in total

1.  The discordant method: a novel approach for differential correlation.

Authors:  Charlotte Siska; Russell Bowler; Katerina Kechris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  BFDCA: A Comprehensive Tool of Using Bayes Factor for Differential Co-Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Duolin Wang; Juexin Wang; Yuexu Jiang; Yanchun Liang; Dong Xu
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Comparing Statistical Tests for Differential Network Analysis of Gene Modules.

Authors:  Jaron Arbet; Yaxu Zhuang; Elizabeth Litkowski; Laura Saba; Katerina Kechris
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The Detection of Metabolite-Mediated Gene Module Co-Expression Using Multivariate Linear Models.

Authors:  Trishanta Padayachee; Tatsiana Khamiakova; Ziv Shkedy; Markus Perola; Perttu Salo; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Plasma microRNA biomarker detection for mild cognitive impairment using differential correlation analysis.

Authors:  Mitsunori Kayano; Sayuri Higaki; Jun-Ichi Satoh; Kenji Matsumoto; Etsuro Matsubara; Osamu Takikawa; Shumpei Niida
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2016-12-12

6.  IntLIM: integration using linear models of metabolomics and gene expression data.

Authors:  Jalal K Siddiqui; Elizabeth Baskin; Mingrui Liu; Carmen Z Cantemir-Stone; Bofei Zhang; Russell Bonneville; Joseph P McElroy; Kevin R Coombes; Ewy A Mathé
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Rps27a might act as a controller of microglia activation in triggering neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nasibeh Khayer; Mehdi Mirzaie; Sayed-Amir Marashi; Maryam Jalessi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differential co-expression-based detection of conditional relationships in transcriptional data: comparative analysis and application to breast cancer.

Authors:  Dharmesh D Bhuva; Joseph Cursons; Gordon K Smyth; Melissa J Davis
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Conditional transcriptional relationships may serve as cancer prognostic markers.

Authors:  Hui Yu; Limei Wang; Danqian Chen; Jin Li; Yan Guo
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  dcVar: a method for identifying common variants that modulate differential correlation structures in gene expression data.

Authors:  Caleb A Lareau; Bill C White; Courtney G Montgomery; Brett A McKinney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.