Literature DB >> 26355129

Launching a Laboratory Testing Process Quality Improvement Toolkit: From the Shared Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).

Douglas Fernald1, Mika Hamer2, Kathy James2, Brandon Tutt2, David West2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Family medicine and internal medicine physicians order diagnostic laboratory tests for nearly one-third of patient encounters in an average week, yet among medical errors in primary care, an estimated 15% to 54% are attributed to laboratory testing processes. From a practice improvement perspective, we (1) describe the need for laboratory testing process quality improvements from the perspective of primary care practices, and (2) describe the approaches and resources needed to implement laboratory testing process quality improvements in practice.
METHODS: We applied practice observations, process mapping, and interviews with primary care practices in the Shared Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)-affiliated practice-based research networks that field-tested in 2013 a laboratory testing process improvement toolkit.
RESULTS: From the data collected in each of the 22 participating practices, common testing quality issues included, but were not limited to, 3 main testing process steps: laboratory test preparation, test tracking, and patient notification. Three overarching qualitative themes emerged: practices readily acknowledge multiple laboratory testing process problems; practices know that they need help addressing the issues; and practices face challenges with finding patient-centered solutions compatible with practice priorities and available resources.
CONCLUSION: While practices were able to get started with guidance and a toolkit to improve laboratory testing processes, most did not seem able to achieve their quality improvement aims unassisted. Providing specific guidance tools with practice facilitation or other rapid-cycle quality improvement support may be an effective approach to improve common laboratory testing issues in primary care. © Copyright 2015 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic Tests; Practice-based Research; Primary Health Care; Quality Improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26355129     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  2 in total

1.  Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Claire O'Hanlon; Yee Wei Lim; Margie Danz; Jody Larkin; Lisa Rubenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "Unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem".

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Sonya Howk; Margaret Spurlock; Paul B McGinnis; Deborah J Cohen; Lyle J Fagnan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.