Valerii M Sukhorukov1,2, Michael Meyer-Hermann1,2,3. 1. Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany. 2. Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe University of Frankfurt am Main, Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 3. Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Abstract
By events of fusion and fission mitochondria generate a partially interconnected, irregular network of poorly specified architecture. Here, its organization is examined theoretically by taking into account the physical association of mitochondria with microtubules. Parameters of the cytoskeleton mesh are derived from the mechanics of single fibers. The model of the mitochondrial reticulum is formulated in terms of a dynamic spatial graph. The graph dynamics is modulated by the density of microtubules and their crossings. The model reproduces the full spectrum of experimentally found mitochondrial configurations. In centrosome-organized cells, the chondriome is predicted to develop strong structural inhomogeneity between the cell center and the periphery. An integrated analysis of the cytoskeletal and the mitochondrial components reveals that the structure of the reticulum depends on the balance between anterograde and retrograde motility of mitochondria on microtubules, in addition to fission and fusion. We propose that it is the combination of the two processes that defines synergistically the mitochondrial structure, providing the cell with ample capabilities for its regulative adaptation.
By events of fusion and fission mitochondria generate a partially interconnected, irregular network of poorly specified architecture. Here, its organization is examined theoretically by taking into account the physical association of mitochondria with microtubules. Parameters of the cytoskeleton mesh are derived from the mechanics of single fibers. The model of the mitochondrial reticulum is formulated in terms of a dynamic spatial graph. The graph dynamics is modulated by the density of microtubules and their crossings. The model reproduces the full spectrum of experimentally found mitochondrial configurations. In centrosome-organized cells, the chondriome is predicted to develop strong structural inhomogeneity between the cell center and the periphery. An integrated analysis of the cytoskeletal and the mitochondrial components reveals that the structure of the reticulum depends on the balance between anterograde and retrograde motility of mitochondria on microtubules, in addition to fission and fusion. We propose that it is the combination of the two processes that defines synergistically the mitochondrial structure, providing the cell with ample capabilities for its regulative adaptation.
Mitochondria are prolonged organelles whose role in controlling key pathways responsible
for cellular viability has become well established. Interest in these organelles is
constantly revived by ongoing discoveries of their central role in widespread pathologies
like diabetes, ischemia, neoplastic, immune and neurodegenerative disorders123456. In all these diseases prominent alterations of mitochondrial
morphology are noted7.Under healthy conditions, mitochondrial motility is imperative for cell survival and is one
of the main means by which the mitochondrial function is adapted to environmental
challenges and is sustained in the long-term8910. The dynamics is
believed to proceed through intermittent division (fission), physical motion, eventual
reshaping and fusion of particular organelles to the same or unrelated partners. The
fission and fusion reactions are executed by specific protein complexes assembled on the
surface of mitochondria from local and cytosolic components and involves assistance from
the endoplasmic reticulum1112. With fluorescent microscopy, the complexes
are visible as distinct spots in the mitochondrial membrane, and their finite number
exposes a limit on mitochondrial fission capacity. When maximal fragmentation is induced by
genetic manipulation, the dimension of the vesicle-like mitochondria is comparable to the
original diameter of their tubules1013. In the opposite limit, a networked
super-fused state of the chondriome may be induced experimentally by restricting fission or
enhancing fusion14. Besides the availability of the membrane-bound
complexes, the fusion reaction is controlled by physical positioning of mitochondria in
close apposition to each other.Cytoskeleton fibers all serve in providing mechanical support for the cell body.
Microfilaments and microtubules (MT) are used in addition as tracks for positioning and
redistribution of cargos actively transported over the cellular cytoplasm, including
mitochondria. Furthermore, the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria and other large
organelles require the cytoskeleton for the maintenance of their internal architecture1516. Complete disruption of the cytoskeleton induces drastic changes in the
mitochondrial morphology, associated with a decline of function17.In the majority of animal cell types, the MT component of the cytoskeleton represents a
star-shaped array, where each MT is anchored to the centrosome, a proteinatious body
available as a single copy during the interphase of the cell cycle18. The
centrosome serves as an organizing center, at which MTs are nucleated to form tubulin
polymers and where the number of MTs is controlled. The opposite MT end often reaches the
cell periphery where it can interact physically with the cellular cortex. In the
interphase, this interaction promotes positioning and maintenance of the centrosome close
to the geometric center of the cell19. The morphology and connectivity of
the mitochondrial network physically depends on these details of the intracellular
organization of the cytoskeleton15.In the longer term, the dynamics of the mitochondrial network redistributes and remixes
mitochondrial material within the cellular cytosolic compartment. It leads to the formation
of a constantly remodeled partially interconnected network spread over the whole cell and
easily observable by optical microscopy2021. Because the network
impediment causes deterioration of cell function, often followed by death, rigorous
decoding of its organizational principles is of urgent priority. While the buildup of
mitochondria has been characterized extensively on the small-scale and molecular level,
still lacking is an accurate theoretical description of their cell-wide architecture. One
of the main obstacles is posed by an immature conceptual basis, not developed enough for a
quantitative formulation of the mitochondria geometry, its extraordinary variability of
semi-reticular configurations2223, as well as its physical dependence on
the geometry of the cytoskeleton15.A graph theoretical formulation (Fig. 1 and Methods) was shown to
quantitatively capture the mitochondrial morphogenesis24. The initial
approach, however, ignored inhomogeneity of the intracellular environment and interaction
with other organelles, potentially able to strongly modify mitochondrial dynamics or to
introduce an additional level of complexity into its network architecture. Here, we
explicitly explore the physical dependence of mitochondria on the cellular
cytoskeleton15. The geometrical characteristics of the MT cytoskeleton
are derived from properties of single polymer fibers. The cytoskeleton-dependent
multi-scale model is then used to examine the spatial arrangement of mitochondria dictated
by their dynamics on the structured background of the MTs. The results provide a deeper
understanding of the mechanisms shaping the mitochondrial network in a space resolved
manner.
Figure 1
Graph representation of the mitochondrial reticulum and its dynamics.
(A–C) The reticulum can be characterized using different
levels of organization: As a collection of nodes of degrees 1 (red), 2
(green) and 3 (blue), i.e. the free ends, bulk nodes and
branching nodes, respectively (A), linear segments between two nodes of
degree 1 or 3 ((B) colors distinguish segments), or sets of physically
connected segments denoted as clusters ((C) colors distinguish clusters).
The grey lines represent cytoskeleton filaments. (D) The nodes are
set to undergo two types of fission and fusion transformations24:
“tip-to-tip” (Eq. (3) with the relative
fusion/fission rate constant α1) and
“tip-to-side” (Eq. (4) with the relative
rate constant α2). (E) The mitochondria
tip-to-tip and tip-to-side reactions are coupled by the availability of
cytoskeleton fibers (grey) and their crossings. Both, linear MT segments
and crossings contribute to the tip-to-tip fusion rate
α1 (the two lower interactions). The branching
process α2 is limited by the availability of the
crossings, because it requires at least two sufficiently proximal fibers (upper
interaction).
Results
Fusion and fission capacity
Mitochondria form an irregular spatial network. Their dynamics consists of physical
motion under the action of motor proteins connected to the cytoskeleton (CS)1517, accompanied by occasional fission and fusion events. The latter
are performed enzymatically by mitochondrial fission/fusion complexes (FFC) able to
catalyze the reactions independently of the CS, provided that the fusing organelles
are in physical apposition17. The overall dynamics known from
experiments, thus, involves CS-independent factors along with those imposed by the CS
organization12.The model accommodates this distinction by incorporating a CS-independent action of
the FFCs, set to operate on top of the CS background. Experimental studies
reveal8 that FFC components are either distributed uniformly in the
membranes of mitochondria or are soluble in the cytosol. In the model, the FFC
activity is described by the parameter γ defined as the ratio of
fusion to fission propensity. It reflects the relative strength of biochemical
pathways performing fusion and fission8. Quick protein diffusion in
the cytosol, enhanced by active mixing of mitochondrial material implies that the
enzymatic factor γ can be considered as independent of the position
inside the cell at steady state.
Constraints of mitochondrial motility induced by the cytoskeleton
The model assumes that the attachment to the CS determines the position of
mitochondria in the cytosol. The actual layout is set by the arrangement of CS fibers
as well as by the distribution of the organelles over them. Both factors are able to
induce the mitochondria inhomogeneity. It is formulated using density functions
depending on the spatial coordinate r and the position-independent parameter
ξ: Q1(r, ξ) density of
CS-attached mitochondria (measured in units of graph edges),
Q2(r, ξ) density of mitochondria pairs
superimposed at the same position of a CS fiber, S11(r,
ξ) density of two-fiber crossings occupied by mitochondria on both
filaments.Although the enzymes performing fusion and fission reactions are highly specific for
either fission or fusion, the cells are not known to express protein species
specialized for either sequential fusion or branching processes8. In
the model, we put forward the spatially structured CS background as the key
discriminator between branching and sequential transformations.Formation of a mitochondrion branching node necessitates at least two closely
positioned (or crossing) MTs. Sequential fusion may occur either between mitochondria
located on the same fiber or on different ones, if these happen to be close enough
(Fig. 1E).In a previously published graph theoretical model of mitochondria dynamics without
spatial resolution24, the constants α1 and
α2 were introduced to describe the rates of tip-to-tip
and tip-to-side fusion events, respectively (Fig. 1 and
Methods). With the help of the densities Q2 and
S11, these rates can be extended to depend on the position in
the cell:Eqs. (1) and (2) inherently allow
coupling the graph theoretical description of mitochondria dynamics to the cellular
organization of the CS.
Mitochondria distribution with respect to the cytoskeleton
Mitochondria are driven in retrograde and anterograde directions along the MTs by
dynein and kinesin motor proteins respectively15. In the model, their
action is described at steady state by a probability distribution ε of
mitochondria mass M = const along the MT contour length
ρ. The occupancy distribution is derived from a description of the
mitochondrial motility along a single MT by a diffusion equation with drift (Eqs. (5) and (6)). The drift is a convenient way to account for
eventual difference in the activity between the two motor types25. The
resulting distribution ε(ρ, ψ) is then
governed by ratio ψ of the drift velocity to the diffusion
coefficient. If the directional bias is absent (ψ = 0)
the distribution is uniform. When unbalanced
(ψ ≠ 0), the motor proteins induce an
exponential increase or decrease of the mitochondrial density in the direction of the
drift (Eqs. (5) and (6)).
A spherically symmetric cell
In this report, an idealized cell configuration with a spherically symmetric MT array
is examined (Methods). The arrangement approximates an animal cell, in which the
mitochondria-supporting CS consists of the MTs grafted at a centrosome19 (Fig. 2A). By utilizing the symmetry, the distance r
to the cell center is the only spatial coordinate. Upon fixing the
position-independent variables other than the motor protein bias ψ,
the functions Qj(r,
ξ) = Qj(r,
ψ), j = 1, 2 and
S11(r,
ξ) = S11(r,
ψ) are simplified and correspond to the radial densities on a
sphere shell between r and r + dr. The
arrangement is insightful by allowing an analytical derivation of the density
functions and a straightforward construction of a Monte Carlo simulation for the
CS.
Figure 2
Centrosome-organized microtubule cytoskeleton.
(A) Configuration of the cytoskeleton in a spherically symmetric cell
generated with the Monte Carlo procedure (see Methods). The cell contains
300 MTs (grey lines) with a persistence length of
32 μm and a contour length of 16 μm. MT crossing
points are shown as blue dots. (B,C) Analytical approximation
to the semiflexible polymer model (see Methods) for (B) the single-fiber
radial density of the MTs (Q0(r)/nf,
Eq. (8)) and (C) their crossing density
(S00(r)/nf2, Eq. (9)) (lines). These are compared to the results of
the explicit Monte Carlo representation of the cytoskeleton (markers,
averaged over 100 randomly seeded runs). The persistence length values are
Lp = 10 μm (red),
32 μm (green), 100 μm (blue). The MT
length is L = 16 μm and the proximity
parameter is σ = 0.2 μm.
With a spatial Monte Carlo simulation (see Methods), an array of MTs that spreads
from the centrosome is generated using a Worm-Like Chain polymer model (Fig. 2A). In all MTs, position and orientation of one end is
fixed, while the other end remains free. Orientations of the grafted ends are set
random and spherically uniform. The CS-related densities are calculated from the mesh
of virtual MTs.Mechanical characteristics of MT fibers are parametrized with the persistence length
Lp, which is a measure for the stiffness of the fibers. The
radial distributions of mitochondria Q1(r, ψ)
and of their same-MT pairs Q2(r, ψ) can be
calculated analytically from the persistence length Lp and the
mitochondria directionality ψ (Eqs. (5, 6, 7, 8)). These
approximations (Fig. 2B
lines) accurately reproduce MT densities, as shown by comparison with data
generated using an explicit Monte Carlo representation of the CS (Fig.
2B
markers).The three-dimensional organization of reticular organelles must involve
branchings2124. In the model, the branchings are formed by a
tip-to-side fusion reaction (Eq. (4)). It requires two or more
CS filaments occupied by mitochondria to come sufficiently close to each other. This
“proximity” is formalized using the threshold
σ = const, set to the mitochondria diameter: whenever
the axes of curvilinear cylinders representing the organelles are positioned closer
then σ, a branching or linear fusion event can potentially occur. The
density S11(r, ψ) of mitochondria occupying
the MT crossings can be calculated from the density Q1 and a
geometric factor accounting for σ (Methods, Eq.
(9)). Unlike Q1(r, ψ), the crossing
density S11(r, ψ) decreases sharply with the
distance to the cell center (Fig. 2C
lines). This difference of the two functions is a major factor contributing to
the network organization of mitochondria.
Fission and fusion dynamics of mitochondria
As reported previously24, fission and fusion processes (Eqs. (3) and (4)) induce steady state configurations of
mitochondria reticulum. This remains true for the space-resolved model (see Methods).
The dependence of the network fission/fusion rates
α1,2 = α1,2(r,
γ, ψ) (Eqs. (1) and (2)) and of the mitochondrial density Q1(r,
ψ) (Methods, Eqs. (5, 6, 7, 8, 9))
on structural constraints by the CS and motor proteins does not change the dynamic
laws (Eqs. (10, 11, 12)), but structures the mitochondrial geometry as a function of the
distance r to the cell center. For any total mitochondrial mass M, Eqs. (10, 11, 12)
yield a radially resolved geometry of the chondriome, parametrized by the
position-independent fission/fusion rate constant γ and the occupancy
bias ψ.
Chondriome characterization
Solutions (Fig. 3A,B) of the deterministic model (Eqs. (10, 11, 12))
characterize the network on the level of nodes ui(r,
γ, ψ) with node degree i = 1,
2, 3 (Fig. 1A) and segments (defined in Fig.
1B). A characterization by physically disconnected clusters (defined in
Fig. 1C) requires a more detailed stochastic formulation,
achieved here with an agent-based simulation of the same system. In the latter,
mitochondria are represented explicitly in a virtual cell and subjected to fission
and fusion events corresponding to Eqs. (3) and (4). (Methods,
Stochastic model of mitochondrial reticulum).
Figure 3
Network structure of the mitochondrial reticulum.
(A) Length of mitochondria segments obtained as solutions of the
graph-based model (Eqs. (10, 11, 12)) in dependence on the radial distance and the fusion to
fission ratio γ. Black lines are cross-sections at distances
of 4, 8, and 12 μm from the cell center. The blue line is
at γ = 0.1. (B) Node abundances as fractions
of the total system size 2Q1(r) with the same
dependencies as in A: free ends u1 (red), bulk nodes
u2 (green) and branching nodes u3
(blue) are obtained as solutions of Eqs. (10, 11, 12). (C) Distribution of the
cluster sizes assuming uniform mitochondrial occupancy of the MTs
(ψ = 0) for
γ = 0.01 (left), 0.1 (center) and 1
(right) at a distance of 4 (dark blue), 8 (grey), and
12 μm (light blue) from the cell center. (D)
Distribution of cluster sizes for the intermediate fusion/fission ratio
γ = 0.1 at distances of 4 (dark blue), 8
(grey), and 12 μm (light blue) from the cell
center, assuming a finite drift of mitochondria towards the centrosome
(ψ = −0.2, upper panel) and
towards the cell periphery (ψ = 0.2, lower
panel). (E) Radially resolved fraction of the largest cluster in the
chondriome for a perinuclear (ψ = −0.2,
rectangles), a neutral (ψ = 0,
circles) and a peripheral (ψ = 0.2,
triangles) accumulation of mitochondria along the MTs. An intermediate
fusion/fission rate constant γ = 0.1 was used
(solid lines and marks). For a balanced radial drift
(ψ = 0), the sensitivity to the fusion to
fission ratio is shown as shaded area by varying between
γ = 0.01 (lower edge) and
γ = 1 (upper edge). Results in
(A,B) are generated with the deterministic model of mitochondria,
and in (C,D) with the stochastic model.
Mitochondrial morphologies observed in vivo are cell type-specific and may
vary strongly depending on the physiological state2326. In the
model, the variability can be reproduced by alteration of appropriate parameters as
discussed in the following. To highlight the differences, mitochondrial
configurations are also compared to those expected in a representative mammalian cell
of moderate size and uniform MT occupancy (Reference configuration, see Methods)2127.
Average and radially resolved length of segments
Image analysis of mitochondrial networks suggests that the degree of nodes (Fig. 1A) is restricted to three or less24. This
implies that the network at position r carries
(u1(r) + 3u3(r))/2
segments, yielding the mean segment length s(r,
γ) = 2Q(r)/(u1(r,
γ) + 3u3(r,
γ)), which can be compared to experiment.Mitochondria visible on experimental images produced with optical microscopy retain
an elongated shape also in perinuclear regions where the reticulum is the densest,
suggesting that the segment length does not drop significantly below
1 μm2128. In the cell periphery, mitochondria
were reported to be a few micrometers long29. In the reference
parameter set, this radial dependence of s is reproduced by the model (Fig. 3A).
A subtle balance between fission and fusion
There is experimental evidence for an important role of pathways controlling the
fission and fusion activity in setting the morphology of mitochondria1314. Our results fully support this view: the cell-averaged length of
mitochondria s(r, γ) was found highly sensitive to
alterations in the global rate constant γ which parametrizes the
intensity of fusion relative to fission (Fig. 3A). It depends
on γ in a unimodal way with a peak at
γmax(r) (Fig. 3A).
Physiological cell-averaged values of a few micrometers28 are found in
the vicinity of γmax. The model predicts that
mitochondria configurations of healthy cells are only found in a confined range of
γ. Outside of this range, configurations typical for cells with
disturbed fusion and fission balance are obtained (see below). In addition to these
clear signatures, the theoretical investigation opens the chance to examine responses
of the mitochondrial network to more gentle perturbations and with details not yet
possible experimentally.When the enzymatic propensity for fusion is set small relative to fission
(, Fig. 3A,B
left arrow), both the branching and the fission capacities are limited by the
absence of bulk nodes (u2 ≈ 0, Fig. 3B
green). The in silico node distribution reveals that besides
u2, the network is devoid of the branchings u3
(Fig. 3B
blue), but has plenty of free ends u1 (Fig.
3B
red). Hence, the chondriome is maximally fragmented, being dominated by short
separated organelles everywhere in the cell.In an idealized system consisting of unbranched segments, an exponential size
distribution of disconnected components (clusters) is expected24.
Indeed, the distribution obtained for with the
agent-based simulation (Fig. 3C
left panel) is close to exponential and only weakly depends on the distance to
the centrosome. This confirms that everywhere in the virtual cell the tiny
mitochondria rarely consist of more than one segment. Such extreme mitochondrial
fragmentations are often observed in real cells as a reaction to excessive energetic
stress or oxidative damage30.With an increased propensity for fusion in the order of
γmax
(γ ≈ 0.1, Fig. 3A,B
middle arrow), the bulk nodes u2 are created from the free
ends by sequential fusion (Eq. (3)) resulting in their
dominance (green in Fig. 3B). Abundant bulk nodes are
equivalent to long mitochondria segments
s ≈ s(γmax).
Longer segments allow for branching via tip-to-side fusion, consuming
u2 (Eq. (4)). However, the branching rate
is not limited by the bulk nodes but by the availability of crossings provided by the
cytoskeleton (Eq. (2)). In this regime, the segment lengths
frequently found in experimental studies on healthy cells are recovered21272829.For still higher values of γ, the segments become smaller again. Long
segments are divided by the increasingly abundant branching points produced by
tip-to-side fusions (Fig. 3A,B
right arrow). Additional branchings physically link the mitochondria, which
increases the cluster sizes. Despite the small segment lengths, the reticulum is
maximally fused and consists of essentially a single supercluster, apart from tiny
satellites occasionally popping out. The separation of mitochondria into two distinct
size pools (the huge and the tiny) is evidenced by a bimodal shape of their cluster
size distribution (Fig. 3C
right panel). Elevated fusion represents an adaptive response to a mild
metabolic stress313233.
Large-scale partitioning of mitochondria
The model results above suggest that the mechanisms limiting the segment lengths on
each side of the peak centered at γmax(r) are
different: Branching is active for and promotes
mitochondrial clustering in contrast to the sequential process prevailing at small
γ. For intermediate values, the mitochondria structure is sensitive
to the MT ordering which controls the branching capacity by setting the density of
crossing spots (Eq. (2)). Here, under the influence of the CS,
cells may become spatially divided into volumes dominated by distinct types of the
reticulum.Indeed, in configurations with neutral or negative occupancy bias ψ,
perinuclear mitochondria, characterized by dense MT crossings (Fig.
2A,C), are found branched but highly fused (dark blue in Fig. 3C
middle panel and D upper panel), while the peripheral mitochondria,
which encounter sparse MT crossings, are mostly linear but rather fragmented
(light blue in Fig. 3C
middle panel and D upper panel). Accordingly, the chondriome is
partitioned into two distinct fractions: A perinuclear supercluster and scattered
mitochondria in the periphery, as schematically shown in Fig.
4. The virtual border (Fig. 4
dashed line) separating the two regions is characterized by a transition from
the dominance of branching nodes to that of bulk nodes. The radial position of the
border grows monotonously with γ, and can exceed the cell dimension if
fusion becomes strong enough.
Figure 4
Schematic representation of the mitochondrial reticulum based on the graph
model.
An uneven density of MTs (grey) arranged around the centrosome results in
more crossings in the perinuclear region in comparison to the cell periphery and
induces a radial gradient of structural parameters of the mitochondrial network.
This can lead to the formation of a percolating supercluster (red),
co-existing together with dispersed mitochondrial fractions (blue). The
supercluster arises wherever the branching rate of the reticulum dynamics becomes
sufficiently large to make the size of the network components exceed a critical
distance (magenta dashed line and cell region highlighted by the magenta
arrow). If mitochondria tend to accumulate in the central region or are
spread uniformly along the MTs (ψ ≈ 0), the
supercluster encompasses the perinuclear volume. In the cell periphery
mitochondria are much less branched and more fragmented.
Thus, in addition to the control of whole-cell averaged characteristics by the
balance γ of fusion and fission, the spatially resolved formulation
reveals a strong sensitivity of the network structure to the radial position inside
the cell. A rich heterogeneity of intracellular configurations is shaped by the CS.
It would be interesting to identify a way in the model, how to control the
intra-mitochondrial variability in space without affecting the chondriome-wide
averages. If this was possible, pathways other than the classical fission/fusion
mechanism might be essential for a proper arrangement of the mitochondria.
Fine-tuning the mitochondrial heterogeneity by anterograde and retrograde
motility
The intracellular gradient of the CS parameters suggests that the cell-wide network
is also reshaped by shifting the mitochondria along the MTs. The reticulum would be
sensitive to alteration of the ratio between anterograde- and retrograde-directed
motion, parametrized in the model with the radial drift to diffusion ratio
ψ. A moderate increase of the bias ψ from
−0.2 to +0.2 modifies the occupancy parameter (Methods Eqs.
(5) and (6)) and is sufficient for reverting the mitochondria conformation
from perinuclear to peripheral clustering (Fig. 3D,E and Suppl.
Fig. 2). The strong sensitivity of the spatial organization relies on the nonlinear
amplifying effect of the MT crossing density onto the fusion/fission dynamics, Eqs. (10, 11, 12).The intracellular variability of mitochondria clusters is more sensitive to the
radial drift ψ (compare Fig. 3E
rectangles and triangles) than to the fission/fusion ratio
γ, which causes a rather uniform saturation (Fig.
3E
upper and lower borders of the shaded area). Uneven positioning
of mitochondria over the MTs, when biased towards the cell center, boosts the
sharpness of the spatial partitioning of the reticulum (compare Fig.
3E
rectangles and circles). The super-fused part imposed by the dense CS
crossings is additionally stabilized against regulation by γ and the
size variation of the network components is elevated (compare Fig.
3C
middle panel and Fig. 3D
upper panel).The effect of the radial drift ψ on the mitochondrial heterogeneity
can be illustrated by comparison of the spatially resolved model to a
position-independent network developed previously24, in which the
distributions are spatially uniform. In the latter, the chondriome acquires either a
condensed or a fragmented state, depending on the actual value of the branching rate
α2 = const(r)24.
The two states correspond to distinct thermodynamic phases, separated by a
percolation transition which occurs at some critical value
α2*. However, because
α2 has the same value everywhere in the cell (is a
scalar number), the phases do not coexist and the only way of changing the chondriome
conformation is via the fusion to fission ratio γ.The radial dependence of
α2 = α2(r)
in the CS-bound system Eq. (2) allows for the coexistence of the
condensation states
(α2 < α2*
and
α2 > α2*)
in the cell, each occupying distinct parts of the volume (Fig.
4). In the balanced cell configuration
(ψ = 0), this is evidenced by the qualitative contrast
between the cluster size distributions at the perinuclear and the peripheral position
(Fig. 3C
middle panel: dark blue, bimodal condensed in the center vs. light
blue, unimodal fragmented in the periphery). The steeper
α2(r) is (i.e. when
ψ < 0), the more pronounced is the stabilizing
effect against modulations of the FFC activity. Also, when the radial shift
(ψ > 0) counteracts that of the MT crossings,
the long-range clustering may become induced (peripherally), but requires a
mitochondrial density large enough to overweight the branching sparsity (Suppl. Fig.
3).
Discussion
Over the past years, mathematical models were established as valuable tools advancing
the mitochondria physiology3435. However, the models based on
biochemical data are limited by ignoring the relation between large-scale structures and
functionality, which is critical for this organelle3637. Development of
more accurate formulations is hindered by the poor characterization of the mechanisms
responsible for the chondriome network structure. The difficulty is potentiated by the
radical diversity of mitochondria conformations among disparate cell types23 and by the ability of the mitochondrial network to abruptly change its
structure after long periods of stable operation3031323338.Experimental manipulation of the balance between the enzymatic fission and fusion
complexes (FFCs) has revealed their role as major regulators of the mitochondrial
size8 and inspired computational examination of mitochondrial
dynamics243940. However, the available models assume a reduced
dimensionality and are not suitable for examination of the geometric conformation of
mitochondrial networks. In particular, the factors regulating internal heterogeneity
among different parts of the chondriome or the susceptibility to the activity of FFCs
remain poorly understood.These questions are addressed in the current theoretical work, studying the
mitochondrial dynamics systemically under the combined action of FFCs and the
cytoskeleton (CS). The chondriome is examined in a spherically symmetric cell
representing the mitochondria on centrosome-organized MTs. Within the dual
mitochondria-CS system, the local density of mitochondria as well as the density of MT
crossings is found to affect the chondriome responsiveness to FFCs. Because in the
spherical cell configuration both critical parameters change monotonously along the cell
radius, the discussion is conveniently simplified. However, the model may be generalized
to less regular cell shapes, provided that the CS density distributions corresponding to
Eqs. (8) and (9) are available. This is
straightforward, because the motility rates (Eqs. (1) and (2)) assume a generic relation between the CS and fission/fusion
dynamics, rather than a particular CS geometry. E.g. in the case of a cell spread on a
cover-glass, as often used for optical microscopy, a cylindrical symmetry of MTs could
be assumed, eventually adjusted further to account for a variable cell thickness.The model results provide evidence that the FFCs are not the only factors essential for
an accurate setting of the mitochondria fragmentation. Centrosome-organized cells
possess the capability to regulate their sensitivity to FFCs by shifting the organelles
along the radial direction. This may be one of the major reasons for the often observed
perinuclear condensation or spread-out of mitochondria towards the cell periphery. Our
data imply, that in such cells, both the balance between the anterograde and retrograde
activity of motor proteins as well as between fusion and fission are necessary
components for the build-up of the mitochondria network. Therefore, the reticulum is
best controlled if the two regulative pathways are connected with common feedback loops,
as indeed is observed experimentally4142. By such a coupling, the
radial motility of mitochondria would enable an inhomogenous and highly flexible
distribution of mitochondria sensitive to adaptive signals, as characteristic for animal
cells23.Renewal of mitochondria is driven by their compositional heterogeneity sensed via the
potential gradient across the inner membrane43. Because the CS is
predicted to modify the diversity through structural remodeling, it may represent a
novel factor affecting the renewal of this organelle. Notably, the impact of other such
agents, among which is the diffusion of membrane-bound OxPhos components, the strength
of their confinement inside the mitochondria cristae and the production of reactive
oxygen species is strongly dependent on the level of chondriome fragmentation4445464748. Quantitative understanding of these processes is
imperative for successful treatment of age-related pathologies associated with
mitochondria74950.Intriguing is the involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum in initiation of
mitochondrial fission as discovered recently11. It brings another
spatially networked organelle onto the chondriome scene. Both the mitochondria and the
ER are associated with MTs, but perform CS-dependent dynamics of their own. Integrative
spatial models could lend a rewarding tool for investigation of such complex systems.
Our study contributes to their development by presenting the CS and the mitochondria as
a unified system.In conclusion, the current report examined theoretically for the first time the role of
external structural factors in shaping the chondriome. The anisotropic organization of
MTs was found to decouple the mitochondrial branching activity from the sequential
fusion of parallel organelles. Amplified by nonlinearity of the mitochondrial dynamics,
the structure of the MT mesh induces a highly non-uniform geometrical composition on the
organelle. The relation can nevertheless be studied in an uncomplicated but accurate
formulation of dynamic graphs. Taking into account the close association between
morphology and physiological characteristics of mitochondria, a quantitative description
of their cell-scale architecture may bring therapeutic merits for metabolic,
immunological or neurodegenerative pathologies.
Methods
Mitochondrial networks can be described by the graph theory
The generic mathematical framework of graph dynamics was found appropriate for
irregular, motile, and spatially extended structures recently24. In
this initial formulation, a well-mixed homogeneous intracellular environment is
assumed. The whole-cell mitochondrial reticulum is represented as an evolving graph
consisting of nodes linked by edges (Fig. 1A–D). The
topology of the graph is based on the analysis of experimental images of
mitochondria24, which reveal that nodes with connectivity degrees
of 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 (Fig. 1A) are sufficient for an adequate representation of the
mitochondrial network.Let Ui denote the set of such nodes indexed by their type i.
U1 corresponds to the free ends of mitochondria,
U2 to places in the bulk where a reaction event may occur, and
U3 to three-way junctions (Fig. 1).
Assuming that the network evolution consists of fission and fusion8,
the reactions correspond to elementary node transformations (Fig.
1D) either of sequential type (“tip-to-tip”, parametrized
with fusion to fission rate ratio
α1 = k+/k)or of branching type
(“tip-to-side”, parametrized with the relative rate
α2 = l+/l)The branching reaction is set here as the simplest possible transformation able to
induce the observed 3-dimensional network of mitochondria24. The model
treats all graph edges equally assigning a constant length to them. The sum of the
edge lengths corresponds to the total length of the cellular mitochondria and is an
experimental parameter set to a constant. The length of an edge can then be
interpreted as smallest mitochondrion unit in the limit of mitochondrial
fractionation when the chondriome is dominated by fission.This previously published graph theoretical approach24 is extended
here by an explicit representation of the intracellular organization of space with
the cytoskeleton.
Coverage of the cytoskeleton with mitochondria
At steady state, the occupancy
0 ≤ ε(ρ) ≤ 1
at position ρ along the contour of a MT fiber is set by the null
condition for the mitochondrial flux at ρ:
ψε(ρ) − dε(ρ)/dρ = 0,
where ψ is the ratio of the drift and diffusion coefficient25. If the mitochondrial positioning is restricted to an interval
[l1, l2],
0 ≤ l1 ≤ l2 ≤ L,
where L is the MT length, the integration constant is set by the
normalizationwhere
nf = const is the number of MTs and
M = const is the total length of mitochondria in the cell.
Then, the occupancy is distributed either exponentially or uniformly, depending on
the presence of the drift,in the interval [l1,
l2], and is zero elsewhere.
End-to-end distances of microtubules in a centrosome-organized cell
Predisposition for MT deformation is parametrized with a persistence length
Lp, which is the characteristic length of the correlation decay
of tangent vectors
∂r(ρ)/∂ρ along the
contour ρ. On the basis of mechanical characteristics, MTs are
classified as semiflexible polymers. Their Lp is of the same order
of magnitude as the full length L5152.We consider first the distribution of positions r for a point on a MT located
at the contour length ρ
(0 ≤ ρ ≤ L)
away from the grafted end. Due to the spherical symmetry in the initial orientation
of the MT ensemble, it is sufficient to consider the distribution P(r,
ρ) of end-to-end distances r between the end grafted at the
centrosome (taken to be at 0) and the position ρ of the point. It can
be approximated with the series53In the calculation of P(r, ρ), a quick convergence
was achieved by splitting the full range of relative distances
r/ρ53: The series above was used for
r ≤ 0.9ρ, and its equivalent
reformulation in terms of Hermite polynomial for
r > 0.9ρ.
Radial density of mitochondria
We consider an array of MTs spreading from the centrosome (Fig.
2A). The position of one MT end is fixed at the centrosome while the other
end is left free. The orientation of the grafted end is uniformly distributed. Due to
the orientational symmetry at the cell center, the radial densities
Qj(r, ψ) on a spherical shell r of
j mitochondria attached at the same MT position are proportional to the
integral of the single-MT end-to-end distribution P(r,
ρ) weighted with the power of occupancy
εj(ρ, ψ) (Eqs.
(5–7)):Steric constraints are assumed to limit j < 3. It is
sufficient to restrict the integration interval to [r, L] rather than
to the full length [0, L], because the filament segment
ρ < r does not contribute to
Qj(r ≥ ρ).The distribution Q0(r) describes the CS without relation to
the associated organelles. It is of general interest as a measure for the spatial
configuration used as a backbone for the organelles. Normalized to a single MT,
Q0(r)/nf is shown in Fig. 2B (lines) for a set of MTs with mechanical rigidities
parametrized with the persistence length Lp. It adequately
approximates the distribution obtained in explicit Monte Carlo Freely Rotating Chain
models of MTs (see below) in the regime of semiflexible and stiff structures
(L/Lp ≤ 1) representative of MTs
in vivo (Fig. 2B)54.
Density of mitochondrial crossings
For two-fiber crossings populated with j mitochondria on each MT, the density
Sjj(r, ψ) at a point on the sphere of radius
r can be found as the mitochondrial mass located inside a sphere of radius
σ centered at that point, and multiplied by the concentration
Qj(r, ψ)where A(ξ,
r) = 2πξ[ξ − (ξ2 − σ2 + r2)/(2r)]
is a geometric factor (see Supplementary
Information). Fig. 2C shows the CS-related density
function S00(r) (lines) along with the data of the
Monte Carlo CS model (markers). In the bulk of the cytosol we have , yielding
S00 ≈ σ3Q02/(3r2).Crossings of three and more MTs involve additional multiplications by the volume
density Qj/(4πr2) and would fall much
steeper than Sjj(r). Because their influence would be
restricted to the very vicinity of the centrosome, further analysis will be limited
to two-fiber crossings.
Steady state of the mitochondria network in a deterministic
formulation
For the spatial extension of the model, the dynamics of the mitochondrial network
based on fission and fusion (Eqs. (3) and (4)) is expressed in
terms of densities of graph nodes ui(r, ψ),
i = 1, 2, 3. The steady state of the mitochondria graph is
given by the law of mass action24along with the edge conservation
conditionThe node densities ui are functions of the position r and
the directionality ψ resulting from the dependence of the rate
constants α1 and α2 (Eqs. (1) and (2)) and the density
Q1 (Eq. (8)) on these parameters. The
first two terms of Eqs. (10) and (11)
account for the branching reaction (Eq. (4)). The next two
terms in Eq. (10) describe the sequential transformation of the
mitochondrial graph (Eq. (3)).
Freely Rotating Chain and Worm-Like Chain polymer models
These models are well established approximations of linear polymers51.
They are used as representations of single MTs.In the Freely Rotating Chain (FRC) model, N monomer subunits of length
a each are consecutively connected into a polymer chain to produce the
total contour length L = aN. The FRC scheme assumes
that each monomer has a constant bond angle θ with respect to the
previous one, and a random uniformly distributed torsion angle.The worm-like chain (WLC) model is a limiting case of the FRC model for
a → 0, θ → 0,
a/θ = const. In this limit, the distance
along the polymer contour can be parametrized with a continuous contour length
ρ
(0 ≤ ρ ≤ L).
Explicit Monte Carlo representation of the microtubule cytoskeleton
A random space-resolved cellular array of virtual MTs is built explicitly from a set
of nf linear filaments grafted at the microtubule organizing center
with a direction uniformly distributed over a sphere surface. The initial
distribution of orientations leads to a quick decrease of the fiber density away from
the cell center. The MT radius (12.5 nm) is assumed negligible in comparison
to the distance between neighboring fibers55. This allows to ignore
steric interactions between the MTs and to model them as a one-dimensional
differentiable curve r(ρ) embedded in 3D space and parametrized
by the contour length ρ
(0 ≤ ρ ≤ L).
We explicitly confirmed the latter assumption by comparison with simulations in which
a finite MT thickness is applied.For simplicity, the total length L is taken equal for all MTs. Most often,
mammalian MTs consist of ≈13 parallel protofilaments forming a hollow tube
with a good cylindrical regularity55. Taking into account the local
axial symmetry, in the explicit simulation, each MT is assembled as a single fiber
using the FRC polymer model. The persistence length is related to the bond angle
θ and the bond length a as
Lp = 2a/θ2.
The length a is set constant and equal to 20 nm. By varying
θ, the desired persistence length is then obtained.The model is formulated in the C++ programming language. Pseudorandom numbers are
generated using the MersenneTwister algorithm56, as encoded in the
boost::random library ver. 1.55 (http://www.boost.org)57.
A stochastic model of the mitochondrial reticulum
The mutual interaction of the nodes in a set of graph edges is calculated with the
exact stochastic algorithm of Gillespie58. The nodes of degrees
1 ≤ i ≤ 3 participate in
fusion and fission reactions defined by Eqs. (3) and (4) with
parameters by Eqs. (1) and (2). The system
is an explicit agent-based representation24 of the approximation given
by Eqs. (10, 11, 12). By setting the reaction parameters Eqs. (1) and
(2) dependent on the cytoskeleton Eqs.
(5, 6, 7, 8, 9), network configurations at specific positions
along the cell radius, values of global rate constant γ or drift
parameter ψ are generated. Each dataset is an average of 1000 randomly
seeded runs and is recorded after full equilibration. Within a run, nodes
participating in a particular event (Eqs. (3) and (4)) are
chosen randomly with equal probability among the nodes of the appropriate type.
Random numbers are generated using VSL routines, part of Intel Corp. (Santa Clara,
CA) Math Kernel Library.
Reference cell configuration
The mitochondria are positioned on 200 MTs
(Lp = 32 μm)54 in
a spherically symmetric centrosome-organized cell with radius equal to the MT contour
length L = 16 μm and spatial discretization
Δr = 0.01L. The crossing threshold
σ and the edge length of the mitochondrial graph are both equal to
0.2 μm and correspond to a typical diameter of mitochondria. The
cumulative reticulum length M = 1 mm reflects the one
found in insulinoma cells or standardized fibroblasts132127.
Mitochondria are distributed uniformly (ψ = 0) between
the MT contour positions
l1 ≈ 0.5 μm and
l2 ≈ 15 μm (Eqs. (5) and (6)). Unless indicated explicitly, this
configuration is applied as the default parameter set.
General remarks
The analysis and visualization of the output data, as well as the numerical
integration and solution of algebraic equations are performed using Matlab (The
MathWorks, Inc.).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Sukhorukov, V. M. and Meyer-Hermann, M. Structural
Heterogeneity of Mitochondria Induced by the Microtubule Cytoskeleton. Sci. Rep.
5, 13924; doi: 10.1038/srep13924 (2015).
Authors: Werner J H Koopman; Henk-Jan Visch; Sjoerd Verkaart; Lambertus W P J van den Heuvel; Jan A M Smeitink; Peter H G M Willems Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2005-05-18 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Stéphane Duvezin-Caubet; Ravi Jagasia; Johannes Wagener; Sabine Hofmann; Aleksandra Trifunovic; Anna Hansson; Anne Chomyn; Matthias F Bauer; Giuseppe Attardi; Nils-Göran Larsson; Walter Neupert; Andreas S Reichert Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-09-26 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Srinivas R Sripathi; Weilue He; O'Donnell Sylvester; Musa Neksumi; Ji-Yeon Um; Thagriki Dluya; Paul S Bernstein; Wan Jin Jahng Journal: Protein J Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.371
Authors: Nahuel Zamponi; Emiliano Zamponi; Sergio A Cannas; Orlando V Billoni; Pablo R Helguera; Dante R Chialvo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ahmed E El Zowalaty; Rong Li; Yi Zheng; John P Lydon; Francesco J DeMayo; Xiaoqin Ye Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Corina T Madreiter-Sokolowski; Jeta Ramadani-Muja; Gabriela Ziomek; Sandra Burgstaller; Helmut Bischof; Zhanat Koshenov; Benjamin Gottschalk; Roland Malli; Wolfgang F Graier Journal: FEBS J Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 5.542