| Literature DB >> 26354349 |
Hee Jung Kang1, Haneulnari Lee2, Eun Mi Park2, Jong Min Kim3, Jun Seop Shin3, Jung Sik Kim3, Chung Gyu Park3,4, Sang Joon Kim3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-Gal is a major antibody induced in non-human primates (NHPs) after xenotransplantation. To understand the mechanism of graft rejection, we investigated the association between anti-Gal responses and graft failure in NHP recipients of porcine islet transplantation (PITx).Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; Early graft failure; Gal; Islets; Non-human primate; Pig; Xenotransplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26354349 PMCID: PMC4579105 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.6.611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 3.464
Frequencies of EGF in 35 recipients after porcine islet transplantation according to induction immunosuppression regimen
| Group | Induction immunosuppression | N | EGF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Tacrolimus, leflunomide, MMF, basiliximab, rituximab | 1 | 7 (100%) |
| Campath, tacrolimus, leflunomide, MMF | 1 | ||
| ATG, bortezomib, leflunomide, MMF | 1 | ||
| ATG, bortezomib | 1 | ||
| Anti-ICAM1, bortezomib, rituximab | 1 | ||
| Anti-ICAM1 | 1 | ||
| Anti-ICAM1, bortezomib, leflunomide | 1 | ||
| Group II | Anti-CD154, sirolimus, anti-ICAM1 | 10 | 5 (26.3%)* |
| Anti-CD154, sirolimus, ATG | 7 | ||
| Anti-CD154, sirolimus | 2 | ||
| Group III | Anti-CD40, sirolimus, ATG | 2 | 7 (77.8%) |
| Anti-CD40, sirolimus, CTLA4-Ig | 1 | ||
| Anti-CD40, sirolimus, ATG, CTLA4-Ig | 2 | ||
| Anti-CD40, sirolimus, tacrolimus | 1 | ||
| Anti-CD40, sirolimus, tacrolimus, ATG | 3 |
*Fisher's exact test; vs. Group I, P=0.0012; vs. Group III, P=0.0166.
Abbreviations: Anti-ICAM1, anti-human intercellular adhesion molecule 1 antibody; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; CTLA4-Ig, CTLA4-immunoglobulin; EGF, early graft failure; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.
Fig. 1Histogram of graft survival in 35 non-human primate recipients after porcine islet transplantation.
The plasma levels of anti-Gal antibodies in the recipients of porcine islet transplantation according to induction immunosuppression regimen
| Anti-Gal | Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM, median (range) | Day 0, AU/mL | 285 (90-6,926) | 363 (42-1,135) | 332 (151-502) |
| Day 7, AU/mL | 506 (57-12,699) | 413 (41-2,373) | 472 (144-983) | |
| Ratio7/0 | 1.78 (0.63-2.03) | 0.92† (0.36-12.62) | 1.52 (0.84-2.23) | |
| 0.0781 | 0.3955 | 0.0273 | ||
| IgG, median (range) | Day 0, AU/mL | 8 (3-13,955) | 12 (3-48) | 6 (1-228) |
| Day 7, AU/mL | 63 (4-46,480) | 11 (1-39) | 13 (2-230) | |
| Ratio7/0 | 3.33 (1.25-62.18) | 0.75‡ (0.31-5.67) | 1.01§ (0.5-6.5) | |
| 0.0156 | 0.0361 | 0.5469 | ||
*Wilcoxon signed rank test; †Mann-Whitney test; vs. Group I, P=0.0603; vs. Group III, P=0.0208; ‡Mann-Whitney test; vs. Group I, P=0.0013; §Mann-Whitney test; vs. Group I, P=0.0229.
Abbreviations: AU, artificial units; Ratio7/0, ratio of the antibody level on day 7 to that on day 0.
The relationship of anti-Gal antibody levels with occurrence of EGF in the recipients of porcine islet transplantation
| Anti-Gal | No EGF (N = 16) | EGF (N = 19) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM, median (range) | Day 0, AU/mL | 399 (42-1,135) | 285 (90-6,926) | 0.3625 |
| Day 7, AU/mL | 439 (41-566) | 456 (57-12,699) | 0.2465 | |
| Ratio7/0 | 0.85 (0.36-2.17) | 1.43 (0.63-12.62) | 0.0009 | |
| 0.1297 | 0.0006 | |||
| IgG, median (range) | Day 0, AU/mL | 15 (3-48) | 7 (1-13,955) | 0.1907 |
| Day 7, AU/mL | 11 (3-39) | 15 (1-46,480) | 0.3043 | |
| Ratio7/0 | 0.74 (0.31-1.75) | 1.33 (0.33-62.18) | 0.0027 | |
| 0.0092 | 0.0237 | |||
*Wilcoxon signed rank test; †Mann-Whitney test.
Abbreviations: AU, artificial units; EGF, early graft failure; Ratio7/0, ratio of the antibody level on day 7 to that on day 0.
Fig. 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of anti-Gal IgM Ratio7/0 and IgG Ratio7/0 for the prediction of early graft failure (loss of graft function within a month) in porcine islet transplantation (PITx) analyzed from the data of all recipients (n=35, A) and from the data of the recipients receiving CD40 pathway blockade (n=28, B). Using an in-house ELISA, the levels of anti-Gal IgG and IgM were quantitatively measured in the plasma samples obtained from the rhesus monkey recipients prior to PITx (day 0) and on day 7 (±2) of PITx. The values of anti-Gal IgM Ratio7/0 and IgG Ratio7/0 for each recipient were calculated from the equation: (antibody level on day 7)/(antibody level on day 0). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) with P value, sensitivity, and specificity at a given optimal criterion are summarized.
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.