Literature DB >> 26354258

Cytotoxicity assessment of functionalized CdSe, CdTe and InP quantum dots in two human cancer cell models.

Jing Liu1, Rui Hu2, Jianwei Liu1, Butian Zhang2, Yucheng Wang2, Xin Liu3, Wing-Cheung Law4, Liwei Liu5, Ling Ye6, Ken-Tye Yong7.   

Abstract

The toxicity of quantum dots (QDs) has been extensively studied over the past decade. Some common factors that originate the QD toxicity include releasing of heavy metal ions from degraded QDs and the generation of reactive oxygen species on the QD surface. In addition to these factors, we should also carefully examine other potential QD toxicity causes that will play crucial roles in impacting the overall biological system. In this contribution, we have performed cytotoxicity assessment of four types of QD formulations in two different human cancer cell models. The four types of QD formulations, namely, mercaptopropionic acid modified CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs (CdSe-MPA), PEGylated phospholipid encapsulated CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs (CdSe-Phos), PEGylated phospholipid encapsulated InP/ZnS QDs (InP-Phos) and Pluronic F127 encapsulated CdTe/ZnS QDs (CdTe-F127), are representatives for the commonly used QD formulations in biomedical applications. Both the core materials and the surface modifications have been taken into consideration as the key factors for the cytotoxicity assessment. Through side-by-side comparison and careful evaluations, we have found that the toxicity of QDs does not solely depend on a single factor in initiating the toxicity in biological system but rather it depends on a combination of elements from the particle formulations. More importantly, our toxicity assessment shows different cytotoxicity trend for all the prepared formulations tested on gastric adenocarcinoma (BGC-823) and neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cell lines. We have further proposed that the cellular uptake of these nanocrystals plays an important role in determining the final faith of the toxicity impact of the formulation. The result here suggests that the toxicity of QDs is rather complex and it cannot be generalized under a few assumptions reported previously. We suggest that one have to evaluate the QD toxicity on a case to case basis and this indicates that standard procedures and comprehensive protocols are urgently needed to be developed and employed for fully assessing and understanding the origins of the toxicity arising from different QD formulations.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer cell; Cytotoxicity; Quantum dots

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354258     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  13 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity investigation of luminescent nanohybrids based on chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan conjugated with Bi2S3 quantum dots for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Sandhra M Carvalho; Herman S Mansur; Fábio P Ramanery; Alexandra A P Mansur; Zelia I P Lobato; Maria F Leite
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  Revisiting the cytotoxicity of quantum dots: an in-depth overview.

Authors:  Sohrab Nikazar; Vishnu Sankar Sivasankarapillai; Abbas Rahdar; Salim Gasmi; P S Anumol; Muhammad Salman Shanavas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-03-05

3.  Synthesis of Hexagonal ZnO-PQ7 Nano Disks Conjugated with Folic Acid to Image MCF - 7 Cancer Cells.

Authors:  S Sureshkumar; B Jothimani; T M Sridhar; Arul Santhosh; B Venkatachalapathy
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Live-stream characterization of cadmium-induced cell death using visible CdTe-QDs.

Authors:  Samira Filali; Alain Geloën; Vladimir Lysenko; Fabrice Pirot; Pierre Miossec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In vivo Comparison of the Biodistribution and Toxicity of InP/ZnS Quantum Dots with Different Surface Modifications.

Authors:  Li Li; Yajing Chen; Gaixia Xu; Dongmeng Liu; Zhiwen Yang; Tingting Chen; Xiaomei Wang; Wenxiao Jiang; Dahui Xue; Guimiao Lin
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-03-20

6.  NIR-Emitting Alloyed CdTeSe QDs and Organic Dye Assemblies: A Nontoxic, Stable, and Efficient FRET System.

Authors:  Doris E Ramírez-Herrera; Eustolia Rodríguez-Velázquez; Manuel Alatorre-Meda; Francisco Paraguay-Delgado; Antonio Tirado-Guízar; Pablo Taboada; Georgina Pina-Luis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Labels for Exosomes.

Authors:  Garima Dobhal; Deanna Ayupova; Geoffry Laufersky; Zeineb Ayed; Thomas Nann; Renee V Goreham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A Tunable Nanoplatform of Nanogold Functionalised with Angiogenin Peptides for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy of Brain Tumours.

Authors:  Irina Naletova; Lorena Maria Cucci; Floriana D'Angeli; Carmelina Daniela Anfuso; Antonio Magrì; Diego La Mendola; Gabriella Lupo; Cristina Satriano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Quantum Dot Labelling of Tepary Bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) Lectins by Microfluidics.

Authors:  Ricardo Cervantes-Jiménez; Lino Sánchez-Segura; Laura Elena Estrada-Martínez; Antonio Topete-Camacho; Elizabeth Mendiola-Olaya; Abraham Noé Rosas-Escareño; Carlos Saldaña-Gutiérrez; Mónica Eugenia Figueroa-Cabañas; José Luis Dena-Beltrán; Aarón Kuri-García; Alejandro Blanco-Labra; Teresa García-Gasca
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  InP/ZnS Quantum Dots Cause Inflammatory Response in Macrophages Through Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Oxidative stress.

Authors:  Shuzhen Chen; Yajing Chen; Yenhua Chen; Zhengyuan Yao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.