Literature DB >> 26353781

Impact of Frequent and Persistent Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) on Hypoglycemia Fear, Frequency of Emergency Medical Treatment, and SMBG Frequency After One Year.

James J Chamberlain1, Dana Dopita2, Emily Gilgen2, Annie Neuman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of "almost daily" use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes who had at least 1 year of CGM experience.
METHODS: In this single-center survey, we utilized a 16-item questionnaire to assess changes hypoglycemia fear, incidence of emergency medical treatment and utilization of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) before and after 1 year of CGM use. Participation was restricted to individuals who used the same brand of CGM system to avoid confounding responses due to differences between commercial devices. Participants were recruited on an "as-seen" basis from a major, urban internal medicine clinic and associated diabetes education center. The questionnaire was completed during the clinic visit. Responses to the survey were analyzed by standard descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients completed the survey: 42.9 years (range: 23-71 years), 38 (51%) female, 59 current insulin pump users. Most (84%) reported wearing their devices "almost daily" (n = 58) or 3 weeks per month (n = 4). "Almost daily" users reported an 86% reduction in incidence of emergency medical treatment events (P = .0013) and >50% reduction in daily SMBG frequency (P < .0001). Reductions in hypoglycemia fear were apparent but not statistically significant (P = .7359).
CONCLUSIONS: "Almost daily" use of CGM with the Dexcom G4 system reduced incidence of emergency treatment events and daily SMBG utilization among survey respondents and a trend toward reduced hypoglycemia fear. This may indicate cost savings in reduction of emergency medical intervention and likely improved quality of life without increasing safety concerns related to hypoglycemia.
© 2015 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGM; SMBG; continuous glucose monitoring; emergency; hypoglycemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26353781      PMCID: PMC4773957          DOI: 10.1177/1932296815604633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  Reduction in hemoglobin A1C with real-time continuous glucose monitoring: results from a 12-week observational study.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Howard C Zisser; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Viktorija Matuleviciene; Jeffrey I Joseph; Mervi Andelin; Irl B Hirsch; Stig Attvall; Aldina Pivodic; Sofia Dahlqvist; David Klonoff; Börje Haraldsson; Marcus Lind
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Perceived accuracy in continuous glucose monitoring: understanding the impact on patients.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Danielle Hessler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-10

4.  HOW PATIENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES TRANSLATE CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING DATA INTO DIABETES MANAGEMENT DECISIONS.

Authors:  Jeremy Pettus; David A Price; Steven V Edelman
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Insulin therapy and hypoglycaemia: the size of the problem.

Authors:  Carmine G Fanelli; Francesca Porcellati; Simone Pampanelli; Geremia B Bolli
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 6.  Hypoglycemia: still the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes.

Authors:  Philip E Cryer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Glycaemic impact of patient-led use of sensor-guided pump therapy in type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M A O'Connell; S Donath; D N O'Neal; P G Colman; G R Ambler; T W Jones; E A Davis; F J Cameron
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Hypoglycemia unawareness is associated with reduced adherence to therapeutic decisions in patients with type 1 diabetes: evidence from a clinical audit.

Authors:  Charlotte B Smith; Pratik Choudhary; Andrew Pernet; David Hopkins; Stephanie A Amiel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 17.152

9.  Incremental value of continuous glucose monitoring when starting pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: the RealTrend study.

Authors:  Denis Raccah; Véronique Sulmont; Yves Reznik; Bruno Guerci; Eric Renard; Hélène Hanaire; Nathalie Jeandidier; Marc Nicolino
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduces severe hypoglycemia in hypoglycemia-unaware patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Pratik Choudhary; Sharmin Ramasamy; Louisa Green; Geraldine Gallen; Siobhan Pender; Anna Brackenridge; Stephanie A Amiel; John C Pickup
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  7 in total

1.  Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; David C Klonoff; Daniel J Rubin; Sherita Hill Golden; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 2.  An Overview of Safety Issues on Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hospital.

Authors:  Bithika Thompson; Melinda Leighton; Mary Korytkowski; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Longitudinal Analysis Demonstrates Meaningful Improvements in HbA1c and Reductions in Health Care Utilization.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Claudia Graham; John Smolskis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Solutions to Address Inequity in Diabetes Technology Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Results from Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Co-creation Workshops.

Authors:  Shivani Agarwal; Gladys Crespo-Ramos; Stephanie L Leung; Molly Finnan; Tina Park; Katie McCurdy; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Judith A Long
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 7.337

5.  Continuous Monitoring of Glucose for Type 1 Diabetes: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  Adoption Barriers for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Their Potential Reduction With a Fully Implanted System: Results From Patient Preference Surveys.

Authors:  Robert Engler; Timothy L Routh; Joseph Y Lucisano
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2018-01

Review 7.  The Rationale for Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Diabetes Treatment Decisions and Non-adjunctive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use.

Authors:  David Price; Tomas Walker
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.