Literature DB >> 26352741

Prevalence of Poor Bone Quality in Women Undergoing Spinal Fusion Using Biomechanical-CT Analysis.

Shane Burch1, Michael Feldstein, Paul F Hoffmann, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of vertebral bone quality in spine-fusion patients at a single medical center.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragile bone strength in a spine-fusion population of women with an age range of 50 years to 70 years. Fragile bone strength is defined as the level of vertebral strength below which a patient is at as high a risk of future vertebral fracture as a patient having bone density-defined osteoporosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Poor bone quality--defined here as the presence of either osteoporosis or fragile bone strength--is a risk factor for spine-fusion patients that often goes undetected but can now be assessed preoperatively by additional postprocessing of computed tomography (CT) scans originally ordered for perioperative clinical assessment.
METHODS: Utilizing such perioperative CT scans for a cohort of 98 women (age range: 51-70 yr) about to undergo spine fusion, we retrospectively used a phantomless calibration technique and biomechanical-CT postprocessing analysis to measure vertebral trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) (in mg/cm³) and by nonlinear finite element analysis, vertebral compressive strength (in Newtons, N) in the L1 or L2 vertebra. Preestablished validated threshold values were used to define the presence of osteoporosis (trabecular BMD of 80 mg/cm³ or lower) and fragile bone strength (vertebral strength of 4500 N or lower).
RESULTS: Fourteen percent of the women tested positive for osteoporosis, 27% tested positive for fragile bone strength, and 29% were classified as having poor bone quality (either osteoporosis or fragile bone strength). Over this narrow age range, neither BMD nor vertebral strength were significantly correlated with age, weight, height, or body mass index (P values 0.14-0.97 for BMD; 0.13-0.51 for strength).
CONCLUSION: Poor bone quality appears to be common in women between ages 50 years and 70 years undergoing spinal fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26352741     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Low volumetric bone density is a risk factor for early complications after spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Matthew Shirley; Nathan Wanderman; Tony Keaveny; Paul Anderson; Brett A Freedman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-28

4.  Effects of systemically administered abaloparatide, an osteoanabolic PTHrP analog, as an adjuvant therapy for spinal fusion in rats.

Authors:  Heike Arlt; Tatiana Besschetnova; Michael S Ominsky; Douglas C Fredericks; Beate Lanske
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Reveals Low Bone Density in Patients With Screw Loosening After Lumbar Semi-Rigid Instrumentation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Maximilian T Löffler; Nico Sollmann; Egon Burian; Amirhossein Bayat; Kaywan Aftahy; Thomas Baum; Bernhard Meyer; Yu-Mi Ryang; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Patients with abnormal microarchitecture have an increased risk of early complications after spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Alexander Dash; Matthew Cunningham; Frank Schwab; James Dowdell; Jonathan Harrison; Caroline Zaworski; Alexandra Krez; Virginie Lafage; Sanchita Agarwal; Brandon Carlson; Donald J McMahon; Emily M Stein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.626

7.  Computed Tomography-Based L1 Bone Mineral Density in 624 Dutch Trauma Patients-Are North American Reference Values Valid in Europe?

Authors:  Tim Kobes; Arthur Sweet; Sophie Verstegen; Marijn Houwert; Wouter Veldhuis; Luke Leenen; Pim de Jong; Mark van Baal
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-16

8.  Prevalence of Poor Bone Quality in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Ricardo Díaz-Romero Paz; Manuel Sosa Henríquez; Kevin Armas Melián; Claudia Balhen Martin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 9.  Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; B L Clarke; F Cosman; E S Orwoll; E S Siris; S Khosla; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.