Literature DB >> 26352291

Automatic liver contouring for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Dengwang Li1, Li Liu, Daniel S Kapp, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

To develop automatic and efficient liver contouring software for planning 3D-CT and four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) for application in clinical radiation therapy treatment planning systems.The algorithm comprises three steps for overcoming the challenge of similar intensities between the liver region and its surrounding tissues. First, the total variation model with the L1 norm (TV-L1), which has the characteristic of multi-scale decomposition and an edge-preserving property, is used for removing the surrounding muscles and tissues. Second, an improved level set model that contains both global and local energy functions is utilized to extract liver contour information sequentially. In the global energy function, the local correlation coefficient (LCC) is constructed based on the gray level co-occurrence matrix both of the initial liver region and the background region. The LCC can calculate the correlation of a pixel with the foreground and background regions, respectively. The LCC is combined with intensity distribution models to classify pixels during the evolutionary process of the level set based method. The obtained liver contour is used as the candidate liver region for the following step. In the third step, voxel-based texture characterization is employed for refining the liver region and obtaining the final liver contours.The proposed method was validated based on the planning CT images of a group of 25 patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment planning. These included ten lung cancer patients with normal appearing livers and ten patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases. The method was also tested on abdominal 4D-CT images of a group of five patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases. The false positive volume percentage, the false negative volume percentage, and the dice similarity coefficient between liver contours obtained by a developed algorithm and a current standard delineated by the expert group are on an average 2.15-2.57%, 2.96-3.23%, and 91.01-97.21% for the CT images with normal appearing livers, 2.28-3.62%, 3.15-4.33%, and 86.14-93.53% for the CT images with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, and 2.37-3.96%, 3.25-4.57%, and 82.23-89.44% for the 4D-CT images also with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, respectively.The proposed three-step method can achieve efficient automatic liver contouring for planning CT and 4D-CT images with follow-up treatment planning and should find widespread applications in future treatment planning systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26352291     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/19/7461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Automatic multiorgan segmentation in CT images of the male pelvis using region-specific hierarchical appearance cluster models.

Authors:  Dengwang Li; Pengxiao Zang; Xiangfei Chai; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Efficient Liver Segmentation from Computed Tomography Images Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Mubashir Ahmad; Syed Furqan Qadri; M Usman Ashraf; Khalid Subhi; Salabat Khan; Syeda Shamaila Zareen; Salman Qadri
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Automatic liver segmentation on Computed Tomography using random walkers for treatment planning.

Authors:  Mehrdad Moghbel; Syamsiah Mashohor; Rozi Mahmud; M Iqbal Bin Saripan
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Parotid gland radiation dose-xerostomia relationships based on actual delivered dose for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jingjiao Lou; Pu Huang; Changsheng Ma; Yue Zheng; Jinhu Chen; Yueqiang Liang; Hongsheng Li; Yong Yin; Danhua Liu; Gang Yu; Dengwang Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.