Literature DB >> 26352244

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: past, present and future of a controversial technology.

Harold L Lazar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will examine the current role of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) surgery for the revascularization of ischemic myocardium. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies have confirmed earlier findings that OPCAB is associated with less grafts per patient and less complete revascularization, and increased incidence of recurrent angina and need for repeat revascularization procedures, and more frequent rehospitalization for cardiac-related issues. OPCAB does not prevent postoperative renal dysfunction and is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Hospital costs are not reduced and are increased in those OPCAB patients who require intraoperative conversion to ONCAB procedures; however, when multiple arterial grafts are used and a complete revascularization is performed, OPCAB outcomes are equivalent to those of ONCAB procedures.
SUMMARY: OPCAB should only be performed by surgeons experienced in this technique in patients in whom a complete revascularization can be achieved; preferably with multiple arterial grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26352244     DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  1 in total

1.  On-Pump vs Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery in atrial fibrillation. Analysis from the polish national registry of cardiac surgery procedures (KROK).

Authors:  Mariusz Kowalewski; Marek Jasiński; Jakub Staromłyński; Marian Zembala; Kazimierz Widenka; Mirosław Brykczyński; Jacek Skiba; Michał Zembala; Krzysztof Bartuś; Tomasz Hirnle; Inga Dziembowska; Piotr Knapik; Zdzisław Tobota; Bohdan Maruszewski; Piotr Suwalski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.