BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes (GDM) is usually diagnosed late in pregnancy, precluding early preventive interventions. This study aims to develop a predictive model based on clinical factors and selected biochemical markers for the early risk assessment of GDM. METHODS: Based on a prospective cohort of 7929 pregnant women from the Quebec City metropolitan area, a nested case-control study was performed including 264 women who developed GDM. Each woman who developed GDM was matched with two women with normal glycemic profile. Risk prediction models for GDM and GDM requiring insulin therapy were developed using multivariable logistic regression analyses, based on clinical characteristics and the measurement of three clinically validated biomarkers: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) measured between 14 and 17 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: HbA1c and hsCRP were higher and SHBG was lower in women who developed GDM (p<0.001). The selected model for the prediction of GDM, based on HbA1c, SHBG, BMI, past history of GDM, family history of diabetes and soft drink intake before pregnancy yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.79 (0.75-0.83). For the prediction of GDM requiring insulin therapy, the selected model including the same six variables yielded an AUC of 0.88 (0.84-0.92) and a sensitivity of 68.9% at a false-positive rate of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A simple model based on clinical characteristics and biomarkers available early in pregnancy could allow the identification of women at risk of developing GDM, especially GDM requiring insulin therapy.
BACKGROUND:Gestational diabetes (GDM) is usually diagnosed late in pregnancy, precluding early preventive interventions. This study aims to develop a predictive model based on clinical factors and selected biochemical markers for the early risk assessment of GDM. METHODS: Based on a prospective cohort of 7929 pregnant women from the Quebec City metropolitan area, a nested case-control study was performed including 264 women who developed GDM. Each woman who developed GDM was matched with two women with normal glycemic profile. Risk prediction models for GDM and GDM requiring insulin therapy were developed using multivariable logistic regression analyses, based on clinical characteristics and the measurement of three clinically validated biomarkers: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) measured between 14 and 17 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: HbA1c and hsCRP were higher and SHBG was lower in women who developed GDM (p<0.001). The selected model for the prediction of GDM, based on HbA1c, SHBG, BMI, past history of GDM, family history of diabetes and soft drink intake before pregnancy yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.79 (0.75-0.83). For the prediction of GDM requiring insulin therapy, the selected model including the same six variables yielded an AUC of 0.88 (0.84-0.92) and a sensitivity of 68.9% at a false-positive rate of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A simple model based on clinical characteristics and biomarkers available early in pregnancy could allow the identification of women at risk of developing GDM, especially GDM requiring insulin therapy.
Authors: Sara L White; Debbie A Lawlor; Annette L Briley; Keith M Godfrey; Scott M Nelson; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Stephen C Robson; Naveed Sattar; Paul T Seed; Matias C Vieira; Paul Welsh; Melissa Whitworth; Lucilla Poston; Dharmintra Pasupathy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Si Gao; Junhong Leng; Xilin Yang; Hongyan Liu; Shuo Wang; Weiqin Li; Yue Wang; Gang Hu; Juliana C N Chan; Zhijie Yu; Hong Zhu Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-04
Authors: Tina Ravnsborg; Sarah Svaneklink; Lise Lotte T Andersen; Martin R Larsen; Dorte M Jensen; Martin Overgaard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adina E Stanciu; Adina Zamfir-Chiru-Anton; Marcel M Stanciu; Anca Pantea Stoian; Viorel Jinga; Cornelia Nitipir; Alexandru Bucur; Teodora S Pituru; Andreea L Arsene; Cristina M Dragoi; Razvan Hainarosie; Alina C Nicolae; Mirela Gherghe; Dan C Gheorghe; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Maria Papasavva; Nikolaos Drakoulis Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 2.967