| Literature DB >> 26351510 |
Luciano Ambrosio Ferreira1, Eduardo Grossmann2, Eduardo Januzzi3, Rafael Tardin Rosa Ferraz Gonçalves4, Fernando Antonio Guedes Mares5, Marcos Vinicius Queiroz de Paula6, Antonio Carlos Pires Carvalho7.
Abstract
Ear acupuncture works by reducing painful sensations with analgesic effect through microsystem therapy and has been demonstrated to be as effective as conventional therapies in the control of facial pain. This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the adjuvant action of auricular acupuncture through an observation of the evolution of temporomandibular and masticatory myofascial symptoms in two groups defined by the therapies elected: auricular acupuncture associated with occlusal splint (study) and the use of the occlusal splint plate alone (control). We have selected 20 patients, who were randomly allocated into two groups of ten individuals. Symptoms were evaluated in five different moments, every seven days. We analyzed the orofacial muscle and joint palpation in order to measure the intensity of the experienced pain. Both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in muscle and joint symptoms (p < 0.05). However, comparisons between the groups showed an expressive and significant reduction of symptomatology in the study group (p < 0.05) already on the first week of therapy. According to the results, to the methodological criteria developed and statistical analysis applied, the conclusion is that auricular acupuncture therapy has synergistic action on conventional occlusal splint treatment. It was demonstrated to be effective in the reduction of symptoms in the short term.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26351510 PMCID: PMC4553336 DOI: 10.1155/2015/342507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Trial profile.
Figure 2Occlusal splint (dental conventional therapy to bruxism).
Figure 3Ear acupuncture: (a) needles inserted into acupoints; (b) protection with hypoallergenic tape.
Distribution of volunteers in each group, baseline.
| Patient | Age (years, month) | Symptoms duration (months) | VAS baseline (main complaint) | Rdc/tmd diagnosis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |||||
| SG | 1 | 32, 2 | 10 | 8 | I.a, BIL | II.a UNI | III.a |
| 2 | 18, 4 | 14 | 8 | I.a BIL | — | III.a | |
| 3 | 24, 4 | 9 | 9 | I.b BIL | — | III.a | |
| 4 | 54, 8 | 20 | 7 | I.a UNI | II.a UNI | III.b | |
| 5 | 38, 2 | 12 | 10 | I.a UNI | II.a BIL | III.b | |
| 6 | 58, 3 | 14 | 9 | I.b UNI | II.c UNI | III.b | |
| 7 | 49, 7 | 12 | 9 | I.a BIL | — | III.b | |
| 8 | 30, 0 | 15 | 9 | I.b BIL | — | III.a | |
| 9 | 27, 9 | 18 | 7 | I.B BIL | II.a UNI | III.a | |
| 10 | 42, 1 | 18 | 7 | I.a BIL | II.a UNI | III.a | |
|
| |||||||
| CG | 11 | 26, 2 | 8 | 6 | I.b BIL | II.a UNI | III.a |
| 12 | 36, 1 | 22 | 10 | I.b UNI | II.a UNI, II.bUNI | III.a | |
| 13 | 24, 4 | 10 | 8 | I.b UNI | — | III.a | |
| 14 | 48, 1 | 12 | 8 | I.b UNI | II.a UNI | III.a | |
| 15 | 55, 10 | 18 | 9 | I.a BIL | II.a UNI | III.b | |
| 16 | 51, 0 | 15 | 8 | I.a UNI | II.a UNI | III.a | |
| 17 | 34, 2 | 9 | 8 | I.a UNI | — | III.a | |
| 18 | 38, 2 | 18 | 10 | I.a BIL | — | III.a | |
| 19 | 45, 4 | 15 | 9 | I.a BIL | II.a UNI | III.b | |
| 20 | 44, 4 | 8 | 8 | I.b BIL | II.a BIL | III.a | |
VAS: Visual Analog Scale; UNI: unilateral; BIL: bilateral.
TCM pathology and symptoms in the study individuals.
| Pathology default | Symptoms | Individuals ( |
|---|---|---|
|
| Headache, tinnitus, irritability, heat, feeling thirsty | 6 |
|
| ||
|
| Tiredness, lethargy, repetitious thoughts, bruxism | 4 |
|
| ||
|
| Tiredness, heat, unrest, bruxism, headache, red malar | 3 |
|
| ||
|
| Depression, abdominal distention, sigh, headache | 3 |
|
| ||
| Liver and biliary vesicle humidity and heat | Bitter taste, jaundice, dizziness, fatty food difficulty, temporal headache, stress | 2 |
|
| ||
|
| Weak memory and concentration, tinnitus, arthralgia, insecurity | 2 |
Figure 4Pain intensity evolution under palpation exam of orofacial muscles and TMJ.
Evaluation of pain evolution between time points assessed.
| Pain intensity variation palpation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal muscle | Masseter muscle | Medial pterygoid muscle | ||||
| Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |
|
| n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 0.036 | n.s. | 0.047 |
|
| n.s. | 0.017 | n.s. | 0.031 | n.s. | 0.046 |
|
| 0.023 | 0.046 | n.s. | 0.031 | n.s. | 0.038 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.001 | n.s. | 0.018 | n.s. | 0.030 |
|
| ||||||
| Lateral pterygoid | Lateral pole of TMJ | Retrodiscal TMJ | ||||
| Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |
|
| ||||||
|
| n.s. | 0.037 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 0.040 |
|
| n.s. | 0.029 | n.s. | 0.032 | n.s. | 0.031 |
|
| n.s. | 0.033 | n.s. | 0.012 | n.s. | 0.043 |
|
| n.s. | 0.015 | n.s. | 0.032 | n.s. | 0.040 |
T: time; value of significance: p < 0.05; n.s.: not significant; Friedman statistical test.
Evaluation of intergroups to average of intensity pain in each time point assessed.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group × study group | |||||
| Temporal muscle | n.s. | 0.042 | n.s. | 0.039 | 0.38 |
| Masseter | n.s. | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Medial pterygoid | n.s. | 0.044 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Lateral pterygoid | n.s. | n.s. | 0.045 | 0.024 | 0.020 |
| Lateral pole of TMJ | n.s. | 0.047 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Retrodiscal TMJ | n.s. | 0.039 | 0.045 | 0.006 | 0.017 |
T: time; value of significance: p < 0.05; n.s.: not significant; Friedman statistical test.