Chih-Ta Lin1,2, Jay K Riva-Cambrin3,4. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 2. Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. jay.riva-cambrin@hsc.utah.edu. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, 100 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA. jay.riva-cambrin@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract
OBJECT: Most pediatric patients that present with a posterior fossa tumor have concurrent hydrocephalus. There is significant debate over the best management strategy of hydrocephalus in this situation. The objectives of this paper were to review the pathophysiology model of posterior fossa tumor hydrocephalus, describe the individual risks factors of persistent hydrocephalus, and discuss the current management options. Specifically, the debate over preresection cerebrospinal fluid diversion is discussed. RESULTS: Only 10-40 % demonstrate persistent hydrocephalus after posterior fossa tumor resection. It appears that young age, moderate to severe hydrocephalus, transependymal edema, the presence of cerebral metastases, and tumor pathology (medulloblastoma and ependymoma) on presentation predict postresection or persistent hydrocephalus. The Canadian Preoperative Prediction Rule for Hydrocephalus (CPPRH), a validated prediction model, can be used to stratify patients at point of first contact into high and low risk for persistent hydrocephalus. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol is proposed for managing hydrocephalus that utilizes the CPPRH. Low-risk patients can be monitored conservatively with or without an intraoperative extraventricular drain, while high-risk patients require the use of an intraoperative extraventricular drain, higher postoperative hydrocephalus surveillance, and even consideration for a preoperative endoscopic third ventriculostomy.
OBJECT: Most pediatric patients that present with a posterior fossa tumor have concurrent hydrocephalus. There is significant debate over the best management strategy of hydrocephalus in this situation. The objectives of this paper were to review the pathophysiology model of posterior fossa tumor hydrocephalus, describe the individual risks factors of persistent hydrocephalus, and discuss the current management options. Specifically, the debate over preresection cerebrospinal fluid diversion is discussed. RESULTS: Only 10-40 % demonstrate persistent hydrocephalus after posterior fossa tumor resection. It appears that young age, moderate to severe hydrocephalus, transependymal edema, the presence of cerebral metastases, and tumor pathology (medulloblastoma and ependymoma) on presentation predict postresection or persistent hydrocephalus. The Canadian Preoperative Prediction Rule for Hydrocephalus (CPPRH), a validated prediction model, can be used to stratify patients at point of first contact into high and low risk for persistent hydrocephalus. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol is proposed for managing hydrocephalus that utilizes the CPPRH. Low-risk patients can be monitored conservatively with or without an intraoperative extraventricular drain, while high-risk patients require the use of an intraoperative extraventricular drain, higher postoperative hydrocephalus surveillance, and even consideration for a preoperative endoscopic third ventriculostomy.
Authors: Kanna K Gnanalingham; Jesus Lafuente; Dominic Thompson; William Harkness; Richard Hayward Journal: Pediatr Neurosurg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 1.162
Authors: Luc Le Fournier; Matthieu Delion; Maxime Esvan; Emilie De Carli; Céline Chappé; Philippe Mercier; Philippe Menei; Laurent Riffaud Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Abd Elrhman Enayet; Mohamed Nabil; Mohamed Reda Rady; Yasser Yousef; Eman Badawy; Mohamed A El Beltagy Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: S M Toescu; P W Hales; J Cooper; E W Dyson; K Mankad; J D Clayden; K Aquilina; C A Clark Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Stefania Picariello; Pietro Spennato; Jonathan Roth; Nir Shimony; Alessandra Marini; Lucia De Martino; Giancarlo Nicosia; Giuseppe Mirone; Maria Serena De Santi; Fabio Savoia; Maria Elena Errico; Lucia Quaglietta; Shlomi Costantini; Giuseppe Cinalli Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-04