Literature DB >> 26350987

Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry.

Pavel Studeny1,2, Deli Krizova1, Juraj Urminsky3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 ± 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 ± 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 ± 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 ± 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 ± 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26350987     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ang; Gian Carlo S Picache; Mark Christian R Rivera; Lord Ryan L Lopez; Emerson M Cruz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-20

2.  In-the-bag dislocation of polyfocal full-optics accommodative intraocular lens: A case report.

Authors:  You Hyun Lee; Yu Cheol Kim
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Optical aberrations, accommodation, and visual acuity with a bioanalogic continuous focus intraocular lens after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Heidar Siatiri; Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Afsaneh Gholami; Elham Ashrafi; Nassim Siatiri; Reza Mirshahi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-29

Review 4.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Alfredo Vega-Estrada
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-26

5.  Long-Term Evaluation of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction after Binocular Implantation of a Bioanalogic Lens.

Authors:  Sylwia Wagner; Grzegorz Wagner; Ewa Mrukwa-Kominek
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz; Francesca Toto; Andrzej Grzybowski; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.