Literature DB >> 26350678

Incidence and mortality risks for circulatory diseases in US radiologic technologists who worked with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994-2008.

Preetha Rajaraman1, Michele M Doody2, Chu Ling Yu3, Dale L Preston4, Jeremy S Miller5, Alice J Sigurdson2, D Michal Freedman2, Bruce H Alexander6, Mark P Little2, Donald L Miller7, Martha S Linet2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures (FGIP) have provided major advances in the treatment of various common diseases, radiation exposures associated with these procedures may cause adverse health effects in workers. We assess risk of circulatory disease incidence and mortality in medical radiation workers performing FGIP.
METHODS: A US nationwide prospective cohort study of 90,957 radiologic technologists who completed a cohort survey during 1994-1998 was followed until completion of a subsequent survey during 2003-2005 for circulatory disease incidence, or until 31 December 2008 for mortality. Incidence analyses were restricted to the 63,482 technologists who completed both the second survey (1994-1998) and the third survey (2003-2005). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess adjusted HR and 95% CIs for mortality from all causes, all circulatory diseases, all heart diseases, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, acute myocardial infarction and hypertension in participants who reported ever performing FGIP compared to technologists who never performed FGIP procedures. Adjusted HRs were calculated for self-reported hypertension, stroke and myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: We observed a 34% increase in stroke incidence (HR=1.34, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.64) in technologists who performed FGIP compared to those who never performed these procedures. Mortality from stroke was also modestly elevated, although not statistically significant (HR=1.22, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.73). We observed no statistically significant excess risks of incidence or mortality from any other outcome evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of elevated risk of stroke in workers performing FGIP needs to be confirmed in studies with individual radiation dose data, but nonetheless underlines the need to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable without compromising key diagnostic information. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26350678     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  13 in total

1.  Mortality in U.S. Physicians Likely to Perform Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures Compared with Psychiatrists, 1979 to 2008.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara; Estelle Ntowe; Ruth A Kleinerman; Ethel S Gilbert; Neal Naito; Rebecca S Lipner; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Changing Patterns in the Performance of Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures and Adherence to Radiation Safety Practices in a U.S. Cohort of Radiologic Technologists.

Authors:  Hyeyeun Lim; Martha S Linet; Miriam E Van Dyke; Donald L Miller; Steven L Simon; Alice J Sigurdson; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Cataract Risk in a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing Nuclear Medicine Procedures.

Authors:  Marie-Odile Bernier; Neige Journy; Daphnee Villoing; Michele M Doody; Bruce H Alexander; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Trends in Occupational Radiation Doses for U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing General Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures, 1980-2015.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; David Borrego; Dale L Preston; Bruce H Alexander; André Rose; Mark Salasky; Martha S Linet; Choonsik Lee; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 29.146

5.  The Need for a Broad-based Introduction to Radiation Science within U.S. Medical Schools' Educational Curriculum.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Pamela B Davis; James A Brink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 6.  Cardiovascular diseases related to ionizing radiation: The risk of low-dose exposure (Review).

Authors:  Bjorn Baselet; Charlotte Rombouts; Abderrafi Mohammed Benotmane; Sarah Baatout; An Aerts
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.101

7.  Predicting Circulatory Diseases from Psychosocial Safety Climate: A Prospective Cohort Study from Australia.

Authors:  Harry Becher; Maureen F Dollard; Peter Smith; Jian Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Radiation-Induced Skin Injuries to Patients: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know.

Authors:  Werner Jaschke; Matthias Schmuth; Annalisa Trianni; Gabriel Bartal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Assessing the health effects associated with occupational radiation exposure in Korean radiation workers: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Songwon Seo; Wan Young Lim; Dal Nim Lee; Jung Un Kim; Eun Shil Cha; Ye Jin Bang; Won Jin Lee; Sunhoo Park; Young Woo Jin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Occupational radiation exposure and its health effects on interventional medical workers: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Seulki Ko; Hwan Hoon Chung; Sung Bum Cho; Young Woo Jin; Kwang Pyo Kim; Mina Ha; Ye Jin Bang; Yae Won Ha; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.