Daniel J Cavanaugh1,2, Abigail S Vigderman1, Terry Dean1, David S Garbe1, Amita Sehgal1,3. 1. Penn Chronobiology Program, Philadelphia PA. 2. Current Address: Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago IL. 3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep is under the control of homeostatic and circadian processes, which interact to determine sleep timing and duration, but the mechanisms through which the circadian system modulates sleep are largely unknown. We therefore used adult-specific, temporally controlled neuronal activation and inhibition to identify an interaction between the circadian clock and a novel population of sleep-promoting neurons in Drosophila. METHODS: Transgenic flies expressed either dTRPA1, a neuronal activator, or Shibire(ts1), an inhibitor of synaptic release, in small subsets of neurons. Sleep, as determined by activity monitoring and video tracking, was assessed before and after temperature-induced activation or inhibition using these effector molecules. We compared the effect of these manipulations in control flies and in mutant flies that lacked components of the molecular circadian clock. RESULTS: Adult-specific activation or inhibition of a population of neurons that projects to the sleep-promoting dorsal Fan-Shaped Body resulted in bidirectional control over sleep. Interestingly, the magnitude of the sleep changes were time-of-day dependent. Activation of sleep-promoting neurons was maximally effective during the middle of the day and night, and was relatively ineffective during the day-to-night and night-to-day transitions. These time-ofday specific effects were absent in flies that lacked functional circadian clocks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the circadian system functions to gate sleep through active inhibition at specific times of day. These data identify a mechanism through which the circadian system prevents premature sleep onset in the late evening, when homeostatic sleep drive is high.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep is under the control of homeostatic and circadian processes, which interact to determine sleep timing and duration, but the mechanisms through which the circadian system modulates sleep are largely unknown. We therefore used adult-specific, temporally controlled neuronal activation and inhibition to identify an interaction between the circadian clock and a novel population of sleep-promoting neurons in Drosophila. METHODS: Transgenic flies expressed either dTRPA1, a neuronal activator, or Shibire(ts1), an inhibitor of synaptic release, in small subsets of neurons. Sleep, as determined by activity monitoring and video tracking, was assessed before and after temperature-induced activation or inhibition using these effector molecules. We compared the effect of these manipulations in control flies and in mutant flies that lacked components of the molecular circadian clock. RESULTS: Adult-specific activation or inhibition of a population of neurons that projects to the sleep-promoting dorsal Fan-Shaped Body resulted in bidirectional control over sleep. Interestingly, the magnitude of the sleep changes were time-of-day dependent. Activation of sleep-promoting neurons was maximally effective during the middle of the day and night, and was relatively ineffective during the day-to-night and night-to-day transitions. These time-ofday specific effects were absent in flies that lacked functional circadian clocks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the circadian system functions to gate sleep through active inhibition at specific times of day. These data identify a mechanism through which the circadian system prevents premature sleep onset in the late evening, when homeostatic sleep drive is high.
Authors: Ying Xu; Quasar S Padiath; Robert E Shapiro; Christopher R Jones; Susan C Wu; Noriko Saigoh; Kazumasa Saigoh; Louis J Ptácek; Ying-Hui Fu Journal: Nature Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Benjamin A Juneau; Jamie M Stonemetz; Ryan F Toma; Debra R Possidente; R Conor Heins; Christopher G Vecsey Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2019-03-29
Authors: Jessica E Schwarz; Anna N King; Cynthia T Hsu; Annika F Barber; Amita Sehgal Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel A Lee; Andrey Andreev; Thai V Truong; Audrey Chen; Andrew J Hill; Grigorios Oikonomou; Uyen Pham; Young K Hong; Steven Tran; Laura Glass; Viveca Sapin; Jae Engle; Scott E Fraser; David A Prober Journal: Elife Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 8.140