G De Keersmaecker1, R Beckers2, E Heindryckx2, I Kyle-Leinhase1, P Pletinckx1, D Claeys1, E Vanderstraeten3, E Monsaert3, F Muysoms4. 1. Department of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 2. Department of Radiology, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. filip.muysoms@azmmsj.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wounds resulting from the closure of temporary stomas have a high risk of developing an incisional hernia (IH) with incidences around 30% in studies designed to investigate this outcome. A temporary diverting ileostomy (TDI) is often used in patients after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: The OSTRICH study is a retrospective cohort study of rectal cancer patients who had a LAR with a reversed TDI and at least one CT scan during follow-up. Two radiologists independently evaluated all abdominal CT scans to diagnose IH at the ileostomy wound and additionally, IH at the laparotomy site. RESULTS: From the oncological database of rectal cancer patients treated from 2003 till 2012 (n = 317) a cohort of 153 patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was identified. Rectal cancer resection was performed by laparoscopy in 53 patients (34.6%) and by laparotomy in 100 patients (65.4%). A total of 17 IH (11.1%) was diagnosed at the former stoma site after a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Of these, 8 IH were in patients who had a laparoscopic LAR (15.1%) and 9 IH in patients who had an open LAR (9.0%) (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.28). IH on the other abdominal wall incisions was reported in 69 patients (45.1%). Of these, 10 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal surgery (18.9%) and in 59 patients had open rectal surgery (59.0%) (Fisher's exact test; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We found a lower number of incisional hernias (11.1%) after reversal of ileostomies than expected from the literature. In contrast to the findings at the ileostomy site, a very high frequency of IH (59.0%) after LAR by laparotomy was found, which was significantly higher than after laparoscopic LAR.
BACKGROUND: Wounds resulting from the closure of temporary stomas have a high risk of developing an incisional hernia (IH) with incidences around 30% in studies designed to investigate this outcome. A temporary diverting ileostomy (TDI) is often used in patients after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: The OSTRICH study is a retrospective cohort study of rectal cancerpatients who had a LAR with a reversed TDI and at least one CT scan during follow-up. Two radiologists independently evaluated all abdominal CT scans to diagnose IH at the ileostomy wound and additionally, IH at the laparotomy site. RESULTS: From the oncological database of rectal cancerpatients treated from 2003 till 2012 (n = 317) a cohort of 153 patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was identified. Rectal cancer resection was performed by laparoscopy in 53 patients (34.6%) and by laparotomy in 100 patients (65.4%). A total of 17 IH (11.1%) was diagnosed at the former stoma site after a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Of these, 8 IH were in patients who had a laparoscopic LAR (15.1%) and 9 IH in patients who had an open LAR (9.0%) (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.28). IH on the other abdominal wall incisions was reported in 69 patients (45.1%). Of these, 10 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal surgery (18.9%) and in 59 patients had open rectal surgery (59.0%) (Fisher's exact test; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We found a lower number of incisional hernias (11.1%) after reversal of ileostomies than expected from the literature. In contrast to the findings at the ileostomy site, a very high frequency of IH (59.0%) after LAR by laparotomy was found, which was significantly higher than after laparoscopic LAR.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computer tomography; Diagnosis; Ileostomy; Incidence; Incisional hernia; Rectal cancer
Authors: Mylan T Nguyen; Uma R Phatak; Linda T Li; Stephanie C Hicks; Jennifer M Moffett; Nestor A Arita; Rachel L Berger; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kevin W Y van Barneveld; Ruben R M Vogels; Geerard L Beets; Stephanie O Breukink; Jan-Willem M Greve; Nicole D Bouvy; Marc H F Schreinemacher Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mehraneh D Jafari; Wissam J Halabi; Fariba Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Michael J Stamos; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven D Mills; Alessio Pigazzi Journal: Am Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: F Muysoms; G Campanelli; G G Champault; A C DeBeaux; U A Dietz; J Jeekel; U Klinge; F Köckerling; V Mandala; A Montgomery; S Morales Conde; F Puppe; R K J Simmermacher; M Śmietański; M Miserez Journal: Hernia Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: T Kaneko; K Funahashi; M Ushigome; S Kagami; M Goto; T Koda; Y Nagashima; H Shiokawa; J Koike Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Mazen A Juratli; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Hans Ackermann; Nils Habbe; Sabine Hannes; Wolf O Bechstein; Guido Woeste Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Karolina Eklöv; Fred Zika Viktorsson; Eric Frosztega; Sven Bringman; Jonas Nygren; Åsa H Everhov Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: C Stabilini; M A Garcia-Urena; F Berrevoet; D Cuccurullo; S Capoccia Giovannini; M Dajko; L Rossi; K Decaestecker; M López Cano Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.739