Literature DB >> 26349638

Prognostic and Predictive Values and Statistical Interactions in the Era of Targeted Treatment.

Jaya M Satagopan1, Alexia Iasonos1, Qin Zhou1.   

Abstract

The current era of targeted treatment has accelerated the interest in studying gene-treatment, gene-gene, and gene-environment interactions using statistical models in the health sciences. Interactions are incorporated into models as product terms of risk factors. The statistical significance of interactions is traditionally examined using a likelihood ratio test (LRT). Epidemiological and clinical studies also evaluate interactions in order to understand the prognostic and predictive values of genetic factors. However, it is not clear how different types and magnitudes of interaction effects are related to prognostic and predictive values. The contribution of interaction to prognostic values can be examined via improvements in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve due to the inclusion of interaction terms in the model (ΔAUC). We develop a resampling based approach to test the significance of this improvement and show that it is equivalent to LRT. Predictive values provide insights into whether carriers of genetic factors benefit from specific treatment or preventive interventions relative to noncarriers, under some definition of treatment benefit. However, there is no unique definition of the term treatment benefit. We show that ΔAUC and relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) measure predictive values under two specific definitions of treatment benefit. We investigate the properties of LRT, ΔAUC, and RERI using simulations. We illustrate these approaches using published melanoma data to understand the benefits of possible intervention on sun exposure in relation to the MC1R gene. The goal is to evaluate possible interventions on sun exposure in relation to MC1R.
© 2015 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; likelihood ratio test; relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI); resampling; treatment benefit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26349638      PMCID: PMC4784265          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  22 in total

1.  Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

Authors:  D B Allison; M C Neale; R Zannolli; N J Schork; C I Amos; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Prognostic or predictive? It's time to get back to definitions!

Authors:  Antoine Italiano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases.

Authors:  Hugues Aschard; Jinbo Chen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  MC1R genotype may modify the effect of sun exposure on melanoma risk in the GEM study.

Authors:  Anne Kricker; Bruce K Armstrong; Chris Goumas; Peter Kanetsky; Richard P Gallagher; Colin B Begg; Robert C Millikan; Terence Dwyer; Stefano Rosso; Loraine D Marrett; Nancy E Thomas; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Genetics and smoking cessation improving outcomes in smokers at risk.

Authors:  Caryn E Lerman; Robert A Schnoll; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond.

Authors:  Guang Yong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Likelihood ratio test for detecting gene (G)-environment (E) interactions under an additive risk model exploiting G-E independence for case-control data.

Authors:  Summer S Han; Philip S Rosenberg; Montse Garcia-Closas; Jonine D Figueroa; Debra Silverman; Stephen J Chanock; Nathaniel Rothman; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Testing for improvement in prediction model performance.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Kathleen F Kerr; Gary Longton; Zheyu Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Evaluation of removable statistical interaction for binary traits.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measuring differential treatment benefit across marker specific subgroups: The choice of outcome scale.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Biomarkers in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Antonella Muraro; Stefania Arasi
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Melanoma Epidemiology and Sun Exposure.

Authors:  Sara Raimondi; Mariano Suppa; Sara Gandini
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  BioPETsurv: Methodology and open source software to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of time-to-event clinical trials.

Authors:  Si Cheng; Kathleen F Kerr; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Steven G Coca; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.