Literature DB >> 26349590

Urethral and bladder dosimetry of total and focal salvage Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy: Late toxicity and dose constraints.

Max Peters1, Jochem van der Voort van Zyp2, Carel Hoekstra3, Hendrik Westendorp3, Sandrine van de Pol3, Marinus Moerland2, Metha Maenhout2, Rob Kattevilder3, Marco van Vulpen2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Salvage Iodine-125 brachytherapy (I-125-BT) constitutes a curative treatment approach for patients with organ-confined recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy. Currently, focal salvage (FS) instead of whole-gland or total salvage (TS) is being investigated, to reduce severe toxicity associated with cumulative radiation dose. Differences in urethral and bladder dosimetry and constraints to reduce late (> 90 days) genitourinary (GU) toxicity are presented here.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetry on intraoperative ultrasound (US) of 20 FS and 28 TS patients was compared. The prostate, bladder, urethra and bulbomembranous (BM) urethra were delineated. Toxicity was assessed using the CTCAE version 4.0. Dose constraints to reduce toxicity in TS patients were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: FS I-125 BT significantly reduces bladder and urethral dose compared to TS. Grade 3 GU toxicity occurred once in the FS group. For TS patients late severe (⩾ grade 3) GU toxicity was frequent (38% in the total 61 patients and 56% in the 27 analyzed patients). TS patients with ⩾ grade 3 GU toxicity showed higher bladder D2 cc than TS patients without toxicity (median 43 Gy) (p = 0.02). The urethral V100 was significantly higher in TS patients with several toxicity profiles: ⩾ grade 3 urethral strictures, ⩾ grade 2 urinary retention and multiple ⩾ grade 2 GU toxicity events. Dose to the BM urethra did not show a relation with stricture formation. ROC-analysis indicated a bladder D2 cc <70 Gy to prevent ⩾ grade 3 GU toxicity (AUC 0.76, 95%CI: 0.56-0.96, p = 0.02). A urethral V100 < 0.40 cc (AUC from 0.73-0.91, p = 0.003-0.05) could prevent other late GU toxicity.
CONCLUSION: FS I-125 BT reduces urethral and bladder dose significantly compared to TS. With TS, there is an increased risk of cumulative dose and severe GU toxicity. Based on these findings, bladder D2 cc should be below 70 Gy and urethral V100 below 0.40 cc.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; Focal salvage; GU toxicity; I125 brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; Total salvage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26349590     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  Favorable long-term toxicity for salvage low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy from a phase II prospective trial (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0526).

Authors:  Randall J Brenneman; Edward Soffen; Hiram A Gay; Peter F Orio; John P Christodouleas; John C Baumann; Brian C Baumann
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

Review 2.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: the technical challenges.

Authors:  Annette Haworth; Scott Williams
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-08-30

3.  Second salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Metha Maenhout; Marco van Vulpen; Marinus Moerland; Max Peters; Richard Meijer; Maurice van den Bosch; Paul Nguyen; Steven Frank; Jochem van der Voort van Zyp
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of focal and total salvage 125I brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy.

Authors:  Max Peters; Marjanne A Piena; Lotte M G Steuten; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Marinus A Moerland; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Template guided transperineal saturation biopsy of the prostate: lessons for focal and urethra-sparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov; Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev; Roman Vladimirovich Novikov; Nikolay Dmitrievich IIlin; Anna Sergeevna Artemieva; Alexnder Olegovich Ivantcov; Evgeniy Alexandrovich Piskunov; Mariya Yurievna Gotovchikova
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.