Literature DB >> 26349410

Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?

Shao-Yun Hao1, Bing Ou1, Lu-Jing Li1, Yu-Lan Peng2, Yi Wang3, Li-Sha Liu4, Ying Xiao5, Shou-Jun Liu6, Chang-Jun Wu7, Yu-Xin Jiang8, Shyam Sundar Parajuly2, Ping Xu3, Yi Hao4, Jing Li6, Hui Zhi9, Bao-Ming Luo10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to evaluate whether BI-RADS (the Breast Imaging Recording and Data System) combined with UE (ultrasound elastography) could improve the differentiation and characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions by comparing with BI-RADS.
METHODS: A total of 1080 patients with 1194 breast lesions were studied retrospectively at 8 different institutions from 3 geographic areas across China (North, South, and West) from June 2010 to March 2012. Each institutional ethic review board approved the study and all patients gave written informed consent. All the cases were examined by conventional US (ultrasonography) and UE prior to ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Performance of BI-RADS and BI-RADS combined with UE were compared in different size groups, age groups and area groups.
RESULTS: BI-RADS combined with UE cloud improve the accuracy by 13.2% compared to BI-RADS alone for all lesions, 23.2% for <10 mm lesions, 13.3% for ≥10-20 mm lesions, 6.3% for ≥20 mm lesions, 18.4% for <50 years group, 1.7% for ≥50 years group, 13.7% for northern area group, 17.7% for southern area group and 4.4% for western area group.
CONCLUSIONS: The help which UE contributed to BI-RADS was greater for breast lesions <10mm and <50 years group.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Breast; Multi-center; Neoplasm; UE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26349410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?

Authors:  Serdar Arslan; Nihal Uslu; Funda Ulu Ozturk; Eda Yilmaz Akcay; Tugan Tezcaner; Ahmet Muhtesem Agildere
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Value of ultrasound elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and micro-flow imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Zuopeng Ding; Weiyong Liu; Nianan He; Xiaopeng Ma; Lili Fu; Lei Ye
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Which supplementary imaging modality should be used for breast ultrasonography? Comparison of the diagnostic performance of elastography and computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Ji Eun Moon; Yun Ho Rho; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-09-24

4.  Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anqian Huang; Luoxi Zhu; Yanjuan Tan; Jian Liu; Jingjing Xiang; Qingqing Zhu; Lingyun Bao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Confirmed value of shear wave elastography for ultrasound characterization of breast masses using a conservative approach in Chinese women: a large-size prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Xi Lin; Cai Chang; Changjun Wu; Qin Chen; Yulan Peng; Baoming Luo; Lina Tang; Jing Li; Jihui Zheng; Ruhai Zhou; Guanghe Cui; Ao Li; Xuemei Wang; Linxue Qian; Jianxing Zhang; Chaoyang Wen; Joel Gay; Huili Zhang; Anhua Li; Yaling Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.