Vivian Welch1, Mark Petticrew2, Jennifer Petkovic3, David Moher4, Elizabeth Waters5, Howard White6, Peter Tugwell7. 1. Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 43 Bruyère Street, Annex E, Room 304, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada. Electronic address: vivian.welch@uottawa.ca. 2. Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. 3. Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 43 Bruyère Street, Annex E, Room 304, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada. 4. Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Centre for Practice Changing Research Building, 501 Smyth Road, Post Box No. 208, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. 5. Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie Street, Victoria 3010, Australia. 6. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), Global Development Network, Post Box No. 7510, Vasant Kunj PO, New Delhi, India. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 43 Bruyère Street, Annex E, Room 304, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of evidence for health decision makers but have been found to lack assessments of the intervention effects on health equity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) is a 27-item checklist intended to improve transparency and reporting of systematic reviews. We developed an equity extension for PRISMA (PRISMA-E 2012) to help systematic reviewers identify, extract, and synthesize evidence on equity in systematic reviews. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this explanation and elaboration article, we provide the rationale for each extension item. These items are additions or modifications to the existing PRISMA statement items, to incorporate a focus on equity. An example of good reporting is provided for each item as well as the original PRISMA item. CONCLUSIONS: This explanation and elaboration document is intended to accompany the PRISMA-E 2012 statement and the PRISMA statement to improve understanding of the reporting guideline for users. The PRISMA-E 2012 reporting guideline is intended to improve transparency and completeness of reporting of equity-focused systematic reviews. Improved reporting can lead to better judgment of applicability by policy makers which may result in more appropriate policies and programs and may contribute to reductions in health inequities.
BACKGROUND: The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of evidence for health decision makers but have been found to lack assessments of the intervention effects on health equity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) is a 27-item checklist intended to improve transparency and reporting of systematic reviews. We developed an equity extension for PRISMA (PRISMA-E 2012) to help systematic reviewers identify, extract, and synthesize evidence on equity in systematic reviews. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this explanation and elaboration article, we provide the rationale for each extension item. These items are additions or modifications to the existing PRISMA statement items, to incorporate a focus on equity. An example of good reporting is provided for each item as well as the original PRISMA item. CONCLUSIONS: This explanation and elaboration document is intended to accompany the PRISMA-E 2012 statement and the PRISMA statement to improve understanding of the reporting guideline for users. The PRISMA-E 2012 reporting guideline is intended to improve transparency and completeness of reporting of equity-focused systematic reviews. Improved reporting can lead to better judgment of applicability by policy makers which may result in more appropriate policies and programs and may contribute to reductions in health inequities.
Authors: Suzanne Bakken; Sue Marden; S Sonia Arteaga; Lisa Grossman; Alla Keselman; Phuong-Tu Le; Ruth Masterson Creber; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Rebecca Schnall; Derrick Tabor; Rina Das; Tilda Farhat Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Doug King; Patria Hume; Cloe Cummins; Alan Pearce; Trevor Clark; Andrew Foskett; Matt Barnes Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michelle Eder; Jamie H Thompson; Daniel E Jonas; Corinne V Evans; Janelle M Guirguis-Blake; Jennifer S Lin Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2017-03-02
Authors: Prajakta Adsul; David Chambers; Heather M Brandt; Maria E Fernandez; Shoba Ramanadhan; Essie Torres; Jennifer Leeman; Barbara Baquero; Linda Fleischer; Cam Escoffery; Karen Emmons; Montserrat Soler; April Oh; Ariella R Korn; Stephanie Wheeler; Rachel C Shelton Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Salman Bin Mahmood; Anoosh Moin; Rohail Kumar; Kashif Mukhtar; Zohra S Lassi; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-18
Authors: Mohit Arora; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Lianne Nier; Lucija Lavrencic; Annette Kifley; Ian D Cameron Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-01-22