Literature DB >> 26348678

Predictors for short-term outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve interventions: analysis of 778 prospective patients from the German TRAMI registry focusing on baseline renal function.

Robert Schueler1, Georg Nickenig, Andreas E May, Wolfgang Schillinger, Raffi Bekeredjian, Taoufik Ouarrak, Joachim Schofer, Christoph Hehrlein, Horst Sievert, Peter Boekstegers, Edith Lubos, Rainer Hoffmann, Stephan Baldus, Jochen Senges, Christoph Hammerstingl.   

Abstract

AIMS: Factors predicting outcomes after MitraClip implantation are not well defined. We aimed to report the influence of baseline renal function on short-term outcomes of patients enrolled in the investigator-initiated German transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty participating German centres prospectively included 778 patients (mean age 76.0 years [71-81], 38.8% female gender) at high surgical risk (mean logistic EuroSCORE 20% [12-32%]) undergoing TMVR with the MitraClip for the treatment of symptomatic functional (70%) or degenerative (30%) mitral valve regurgitation (FMR, DMR). The patients were stratified according to renal function before clip implantation. The prevalence of moderate to severe renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 ml/min) was 62.7% (37.3%, normal renal function [GFR >60 ml/min]; 49.6%, moderate renal impairment [GFR 30-60 ml/min]; 13.1%, severe renal impairment [GFR <30 ml/min]). TMVR was successfully completed in 98.2% of cases; acute procedural failure, in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 1.8%, 2.3% and 4.4%, respectively. Acute procedural failure and mortality rates (in-hospital, 30-day) were significantly higher in patients with severe renal impairment (5.9%, 7.8%, 14.1%), as compared to patients with moderately (1%, 1.3%, 3.0%) or mildly impaired to normal (1.4%, 1.7%, 2.9%) renal function (p<0.0001). Following Cox regression analysis, the prevalence of severe renal impairment at the time of TMVR was the only predictor for increased 30-day mortality rates (hazard ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval 1.88-6.2; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal function at the time of interventional mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system is a strong predictor for procedural outcomes. Patients with severe renal impairment have a more than threefold increased risk for acute procedural failure, in-hospital death and 30-day mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26348678     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY15M09_07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  8 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease based on the forgotten reproductive hormones.

Authors:  C W Gregory; R L Bowen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on the outcomes of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair using MitraClip.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kaneko; Michael Neuss; Thomas Schau; Jens Weissenborn; Christian Butter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter mitral valve repair: a prospective cohort study and systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Iliadis; Samuel Lee; Kathrin Kuhr; Clemens Metze; Anna-Sophie Matzik; Guido Michels; Volker Rudolph; Stephan Baldus; Roman Pfister
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Impact of cardiac comorbidities on early and 1-year outcome after percutaneous mitral valve interventions: data from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry.

Authors:  Carsten Schwencke; Klaudija Bijuklic; Taoufik Ouarrak; Edith Lubos; Wolfgang Schillinger; Björn Plicht; Holger Eggebrecht; Stephan Baldus; Gerhard Schymik; Peter Boekstegers; Rainer Hoffmann; Jochen Senges; Joachim Schofer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Established interventions for mitral valve regurgitation. Current evidence.

Authors:  Mathias Orban; D Braun; Martin Orban; L Gross; M Näbauer; C M Hagl; S Massberg; J Hausleiter
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Mitral Valve Interventions in Structural Heart Disease.

Authors:  Matteo Saccocci; Maurizio Taramasso; Francesco Maisano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Managing mitral regurgitation: focus on the MitraClip device.

Authors:  J Trent Magruder; Todd C Crawford; Joshua C Grimm; Joseph L Fredi; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-04-12

8.  Is Mitral Valve Repair Superior to Mitral Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients? Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.

Authors:  Miriam Silaschi; Sanjay Chaubey; Omar Aldalati; Habib Khan; Mohammed Mohsin Uzzaman; Mrinal Singh; Max Baghai; Ranjit Deshpande; Olaf Wendler
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.