Literature DB >> 26348418

Fluid bolus therapy: monitoring and predicting fluid responsiveness.

Andrea Carsetti1, Maurizio Cecconi, Andrew Rhodes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: When a condition of hypoperfusion has been identified, clinicians must decide whether fluids may increase blood flow or whether other therapeutic approaches are needed. For this purpose, several tests and parameters have been introduced in clinical practice to predict fluid responsiveness and guide therapy. RECENT
FINDINGS: Fluid challenge is the gold standard test to assess the preload dependence of the patients. Moreover, several parameters and tests avoiding fluid administration are now available. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation are based on heart-lung interaction and can be used to assess fluid responsiveness. These parameters have several limitations and can really be used in a limited number of critically ill patients. End-expiratory occlusion test and passive leg raising have been proposed to overcome these limitations. The aim of resuscitation is to increase blood flow and perfusion pressure. Dynamic arterial elastance has been recently proposed to predict the pressure response after fluid challenge in preload-dependent patients. Finally, the effects of volume expansion of hemodynamic parameters do not necessarily reach the microcirculation, which should also be assessed.
SUMMARY: Nowadays, several parameters are available to assess fluid responsiveness. Clinicians need to know all of them, with their limitations, without forgetting that the final aim of all therapies is to improve the microcirculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348418     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  11 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamic Assessment of a Large Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation in a Neonate: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Paola Giliberti; Domenico Umberto De Rose; Francesca Landolfo; Claudia Columbo; Flaminia Pugnaloni; Alessandra Santisi; Andrea Conforti; Aurelio Secinaro; Paola Francalanci; Patrizia Bozza; Natalia Chukhlantseva; Ferdinando Savignoni; Leonardo Caforio; Alessandra Toscano; Antonio Novelli; Andrea Dotta; Irma Capolupo; Pietro Bagolan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 1.838

2.  Fourth Surviving Sepsis Campaign's hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos?

Authors:  Glenn Hernández; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Yi; Zhongqiang Liu; Lina Qiao; Chaomin Wan; Dezhi Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of radial artery pulse pressure effects on detection of stroke volume changes after volume loading maneuvers in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Hou; Ji-Li Zheng; Guo-Guang Ma; Xiao-Ming Lin; Guang-Wei Hao; Ying Su; Jing-Chao Luo; Kai Liu; Zhe Luo; Guo-Wei Tu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

5.  Reliability of Passive Leg Raising, Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Christoph Karl Hofer; Martin Geisen; Sonja Hartnack; Omer Dzemali; Michael Thomas Ganter; Andreas Zollinger
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-04-01

6.  The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  In-Jung Jun; Mi Hwa Chung; Jung Eun Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Jung Mo Son; Eun Mi Choi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Fluid overload in children undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Clarice Laroque Sinott Lopes; Jefferson Pedro Piva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017-09-28

8.  Internal jugular vein variability predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients with mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Guo-Guang Ma; Guang-Wei Hao; Xiao-Mei Yang; Du-Ming Zhu; Lan Liu; Hua Liu; Guo-Wei Tu; Zhe Luo
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Estimated oxygen extraction versus dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrea Carsetti; Mirco Amici; Tonino Bernacconi; Paolo Brancaleoni; Elisabetta Cerutti; Marco Chiarello; Diego Cingolani; Luisanna Cola; Daniela Corsi; Giorgio Forlini; Marina Giampieri; Salvatore Iuorio; Tiziana Principi; Giuseppe Tappatà; Michele Tempesta; Erica Adrario; Abele Donati
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  An observational study of intensivists' expectations and effects of fluid boluses in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Olof Wall; Salvatore Cutuli; Anthony Wilson; Glenn Eastwood; Adam Lipka-Falck; Daniel Törnberg; Rinaldo Bellomo; Maria Cronhjort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.