Literature DB >> 26348184

Comparing Cervical Cytology and Histology Among Human Papillomavirus-Vaccinated and -Unvaccinated Women in an Academic Colposcopy Clinic.

Benjamin J Dorton1, Allison F Vitonis, Sarah Feldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze differences in cytology and histology results between patients previously vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) compared with unvaccinated patients who presented to an academic colposcopy clinic for evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology.
METHODS: Using data from a patient registry from 2007 to 2014, we examined 1,662 patients aged 26 years or younger at the time of presentation. Demographics, HPV vaccination status, smoking, pregnancy history, sexually transmitted infections, number of sexual partners, contraception, immunosuppression, and other relevant medical issues were reviewed. Cytology and histology results were compared between previously HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated women to determine if there was a difference in the severity of subsequent cytologic or pathologic specimens.
RESULTS: In multivariable analyses, women who previously received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine had 53% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.66; P<.001) lower odds of presenting with high-grade cytology (adenocarcinoma in situ, atypical glandular cells, atypical squamous cells cannot rule out high grade, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and 36% (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85; P=.002) lower odds of presenting with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 or worse histology compared with unvaccinated women.
CONCLUSION: Patients presenting for colposcopic evaluation of abnormal cytology who had previously received the HPV vaccine had fewer high-grade lesions on both cytology and histology when compared with HPV-unvaccinated women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348184     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Terresa J Eun; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.456

2.  Self-reported human papillomavirus vaccination does not have an impact on the risk for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women referred for colposcopy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Pratibha S Binder; Matthew A Powell; L Stewart Massad; Feng Gao
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The Next Generation of Cervical Cancer Screening: Should Guidelines Focus on Best Practices for the Future or Current Screening Capacity?

Authors:  Phil Castle; Sarah Feldman; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Equal Management of Equal Risks: What Should be Used as the Standard for Cervical Cancer Prevention?

Authors:  Walter K Kinney; Rebecca B Perkins; George F Sawaya
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.