Literature DB >> 26348126

Effects of nicotine on the digestive performance of nectar-feeding birds reflect their relative tolerance to this alkaloid.

S Lerch-Henning1, S W Nicolson2.   

Abstract

The paradox of secondary metabolites, toxic defence compounds produced by plants, in nectar and fruits is well known. Deterrence of feeding by nectarivorous and frugivorous birds is better understood than the effect of these chemicals on the digestive performance of birds. Digestive parameters such as transit time and sugar assimilation are important in assessing nutrient utilization and deterrence may be related to post-ingestive effects involving these parameters. Nectar and many fruits contain mainly sugars and water, and avian consumers compensate for low sugar content in their diet by increasing food intake: this may also increase their intake of secondary metabolites. We investigated how the alkaloid nicotine, naturally present in nectar of Nicotiana species, influences compensatory feeding and digestive performance of nectar-feeding birds. High nicotine concentration negatively affected compensatory feeding and apparent assimilation efficiency of white-bellied sunbirds Cinnyris talatala and Cape white-eyes Zosterops virens; but nicotine slowed gut transit time only in the latter species. In contrast, food intake and digestive performance of dark-capped bulbuls Pycnonotus tricolor was unaffected by nicotine up to a concentration of 50μM. Bulbuls are primarily frugivorous; hence, they are more exposed to secondary metabolites than sunbirds and possibly white-eyes. Because their diet is richer in toxins, frugivorous birds may have evolved more efficient detoxification strategies than those of specialist nectar-feeding birds.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent assimilation efficiency; Bird pollinators; Foraging behaviour; Gut transit time; Secondary metabolites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348126     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  3 in total

1.  Detoxification and elimination of nicotine by nectar-feeding birds.

Authors:  S Lerch-Henning; E E Du Rand; S W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.

Authors:  Christina G Halpin; John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe; Graeme D Ruxton; Andrew D Higginson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Do predator energy demands or previous exposure influence protection by aposematic coloration of prey?

Authors:  Petr Veselý; Barbora Ernestová; Oldřich Nedvěd; Roman Fuchs
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.624

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.