Literature DB >> 26348102

Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines.

Jung Hyun Yoon1, Hye Sun Lee1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Hee Jung Moon1, Jin Young Kwak1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules with the 2014 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. From November 2013 to July 2014, 1293 thyroid nodules in 1241 patients (mean age, 50.8 years ± 13.5) were included in this study. All nodules measured at least 10 mm. Solidity, hypoechogenicity or marked hypoechogenicity, microlobulated to irregular margin, microcalcifications or mixed calcifications, and nonparallel shape were considered suspicious features at ultrasonography (US). A TIRADS category and the US pattern as determined with ATA guidelines were assigned to each nodule. The correlation between the TIRADS category or ATA pattern and the malignancy rate was evaluated with the Spearman rank test.
RESULTS: Of the 1293 thyroid nodules, 1059 (81.9%) were benign and 234 (18.1%) were malignant. Forty-four of the 1293 nodules (3.4%) did not meet the criteria for the ATA patterns and were classified as "not specified." The malignancy rates of TIRADS category 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5 nodules were 1.9% (six of 316 nodules), 4.2% (17 of 408 nodules), 12.9% (33 of 256 nodules), 49.8% (130 of 261 nodules), and 92.3% (48 of 52 nodules), respectively, with significant differences between categories (P < .001). Malignancy rates of nodules with very low, low, intermediate, and high suspicion for malignancy with the ATA guidelines and not specified patterns were 2.7% (11 of 407 nodules), 3.1% (10 of 323 nodules), 16.7% (39 of 233 nodules), 58.0% (166 of 286 nodules), and 18.2% (eight of 44 nodules), respectively, with significant differences between patterns (P < .001). There was high correlation between classification with TIRADS (r = 1.000, P < .001) and ATA guidelines (r = 0.900, P = 0.037), without statistically significant differences (P = .873).
CONCLUSION: Both TIRADS and the ATA guidelines provide effective malignancy risk stratification for thyroid nodules. Nodules that do not meet the criteria for a specific pattern with the ATA guidelines have a relatively high risk of malignancy (18.2%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348102     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  62 in total

1.  Toward Automated Pre-Biopsy Thyroid Cancer Risk Estimation in Ultrasound.

Authors:  Alfiia Galimzianova; Sean M Siebert; Aya Kamaya; Terry S Desser; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.

Authors:  Jing-Liang Ruan; Hai-Yun Yang; Rong-Bin Liu; Ming Liang; Ping Han; Xiao-Lin Xu; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Wu; Jia-Rui Du; Hui Wang; Chun-Xiang Jin; Guo-Qing Sui; Dong-Yan Yang; Yuan-Qiang Lin; Qiang Luo; Ping Fu; He-Qun Li; Deng-Ke Teng
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Risk of malignancy in 1502 solid thyroid nodules >1 cm using the new ultrasonographic classification of the American Thyroid Association.

Authors:  Pedro Weslley Rosario; Alexandre Lemos da Silva; Marcelo Saldanha Nunes; Michelle Aparecida Ribeiro Borges; Gabriela Franco Mourão; Maria Regina Calsolari
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Diagnostic performance of ATA, BTA and TIRADS sonographic patterns in the prediction of malignancy in histologically proven thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Chiaw Ling Chng; Hong Chang Tan; Chow Wei Too; Wei Ying Lim; Priscilla Pei Sze Chiam; Ling Zhu; Nivedita Vikas Nadkarni; Adoree Yi Ying Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Luying Gao; Xuehua Xi; Yuxin Jiang; Xiao Yang; Ying Wang; Shenling Zhu; Xingjian Lai; Xiaoyan Zhang; Ruina Zhao; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Development and validation of an ultrasound-based nomogram to improve the diagnostic accuracy for malignant thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Bao-Liang Guo; Fu-Sheng Ouyang; Li-Zhu Ouyang; Zi-Wei Liu; Shao-Jia Lin; Wei Meng; Xi-Yi Huang; Hai-Xiong Chen; Shao-Ming Yang; Qiu-Gen Hu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults: The EU-TIRADS.

Authors:  Gilles Russ; Steen J Bonnema; Murat Faik Erdogan; Cosimo Durante; Rose Ngu; Laurence Leenhardt
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2017-08-08

9.  Medullary thyroid carcinoma: Application of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) Classification.

Authors:  Gabin Yun; Yeo Koon Kim; Sang Il Choi; Ji-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience.

Authors:  Fernando Di Fermo; Noelia Sforza; Melanie Rosmarin; Yanina Morosan Allo; Carina Parisi; Jimena Santamaria; Nestor Pacenza; Carlos Zuk; Cristina Faingold; Florencia Ferraro; Tomas Meroño; Gabriela Brenta
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.