Literature DB >> 26347995

Diagnosis of Calcific Tendonitis of the Rotator Cuff by Using Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging.

Dominik Nörenberg1, Hans U Ebersberger1, Thula Walter1, Ben Ockert1, Gesine Knobloch1, Gerd Diederichs1, Bernd Hamm1, Marcus R Makowski1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and standard shoulder joint magnetic resonance (MR) sequences in comparison to that of conventional radiography for the identification of calcifications in the rotator cuff in patients with calcific tendonitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this prospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Fifty-four patients clinically suspected of having calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff were included. On radiographs (the standard of reference), 27 patients had positive calcification findings, and 27 did not. Standard MR sequences and SWI, including magnitude and phase imaging, were performed. The diameter of calcifications was measured to assess intermodality correlations. Sensitivity, specificity, and intra- and interobserver agreement were calculated. Phantom measurements were performed to assess the detection limit of SWI.
RESULTS: Fifty-six calcifications were detected with radiography in 27 patients. Most (55 calcifications, 98%) could be identified as calcifications by using SWI. Standard T1- and T2-weighted sequences were used to identify 33 calcifications (59%). SWI yielded a sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.943, 1) and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 0.886, 1) for the identification of calcifications when compared with radiography. Standard rotator cuff MR sequences yielded a sensitivity of 59% (95% CI: 0.422, 0.758) and specificity of 67% (95% CI: 0.493, 0.847). Diameter measurements demonstrated a high correlation between SWI and radiography (R(2) = 0.90), with overestimation of lesion diameter at SWI (mean ± standard deviation for SWI, 7.6 mm ± 5.4; for radiography, 5.3 mm ± 5.1). SWI yielded higher interobserver agreement (R(2) = 0.99, P < .001; 95% CI: 0.989, 0.996) compared with standard MR sequences (R(2) = 0.67, P = .62; 95% CI: 0.703, 0.899). In phantom experiments, SWI and computed tomography were used to identify small calcifications that were missed at radiography.
CONCLUSION: SWI enables the reliable detection of calcifications in the rotator cuff in patients with calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers better sensitivity and specificity than standard rotator cuff MR sequences. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347995     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Principles and applications of susceptibility weighted imaging].

Authors:  F T Kurz; M Freitag; H-P Schlemmer; M Bendszus; C H Ziener
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of vertebral body fractures using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sarah M Böker; Lisa C Adams; Yvonne Y Bender; Moritz Wagner; Torsten Diekhoff; Eva Fallenberg; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  A narrative review of imaging in calcinosis associated with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Diane Mar; Antonia Valenzuela; Kathryn J Stevens; Lorinda Chung; Robert M Fairchild
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Sonographic evaluation of the association between calcific tendinopathy and rotator cuff tear: a case-controlled comparison.

Authors:  Nicholas C Laucis; Kelli A Rosen; Anay Thodge; Jessica R Leschied; Chad L Klochko; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Imaging features of calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease: consensus definitions from an international multidisciplinary working group.

Authors:  Sara K Tedeschi; Fabio Becce; Tristan Pascart; Ali Guermazi; Jean-François Budzik; Nicola Dalbeth; Georgios Filippou; Annamaria Iagnocco; Minna J Kohler; Jean-Denis Laredo; Stacy E Smith; F Joseph Simeone; Janeth Yinh; Hyon Choi; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 5.178

Review 6.  Periarticular calcifications.

Authors:  Y Y Yan; Y N Bin Dous; H A Ouellette; P L Munk; N Murray; P I Mallinson; M A Sheikh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of calcifications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Keno Bressem; Sarah Maria Böker; Yi-Na Yvonne Bender; Dominik Nörenberg; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Sarah M Böker; Yvonne Y Bender; Gerd Diederichs; Eva M Fallenberg; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Radiological identification and analysis of soft tissue musculoskeletal calcifications.

Authors:  Véronique Freire; Thomas P Moser; Marianne Lepage-Saucier
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07

10.  Establishment of a biophysical model to optimize endoscopic targeting of magnetic nanoparticles for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Anjali A Roeth; Ioana Slabu; Martin Baumann; Patrick H Alizai; Maximilian Schmeding; Gernot Guentherodt; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulf P Neumann
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.