Literature DB >> 26347560

Fin ray sensation participates in the generation of normal fin movement in the hovering behavior of the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus).

Richard Williams1, Melina E Hale2.   

Abstract

For many fish species, the pectoral fins serve as important propulsors and stabilizers and are precisely controlled. Although it has been shown that mechanosensory feedback from the fin ray afferent nerves provides information on ray bending and position, the effects of this feedback on fin movement are not known. In other taxa, including insects and mammals, sensory feedback from the limbs has been shown to be important for control of limb-based behaviors and we hypothesized that this is also the case for the fishes. In this study, we examined the impact of the loss of sensory feedback from the pectoral fins on movement kinematics during hover behavior. Research was performed with bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), a model for understanding the biomechanics of swimming and for bio-inspired design of engineered fins. The bluegill beats its pectoral fins rhythmically, and in coordination with pelvic and median fin movement, to maintain a stationary position while hovering. Bilateral deafferentation of the fin rays results in a splay-finned posture where fins beat regularly but at a higher frequency and without adducting fully against the side of the body. For unilateral transections, more irregular changes in fin movements were recorded. These data indicate that sensory feedback from the fin rays and membrane is important for generating normal hover movements but is not necessary for generating rhythmic fin movement.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fish; Hover; Pectoral fin; Proprioception; Sensory feedback; Swim

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347560     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.123638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Touch sensation by pectoral fins of the catfish Pimelodus pictus.

Authors:  Adam R Hardy; Bailey M Steinworth; Melina E Hale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Characterization of the encoding properties of intraspinal mechanosensory neurons in the lamprey.

Authors:  Nicole Massarelli; Allan L Yau; Kathleen A Hoffman; Tim Kiemel; Eric D Tytell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Mechanosensation is evolutionarily tuned to locomotor mechanics.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Mark W Westneat; Melina E Hale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Making sense of sparse data with neural encoding strategies.

Authors:  Melina E Hale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanosensation in an adipose fin.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Thomas A Stewart; Melina E Hale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Distribution and Restoration of Serotonin-Immunoreactive Paraneuronal Cells During Caudal Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Désirée König; Paule Dagenais; Anita Senk; Valentin Djonov; Christof M Aegerter; Anna Jaźwińska
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 7.  Principles Governing Locomotion in Vertebrates: Lessons From Zebrafish.

Authors:  Eva M Berg; E Rebecka Björnfors; Irene Pallucchi; Laurence D Picton; Abdeljabbar El Manira
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Hindbrain and Spinal Cord Contributions to the Cutaneous Sensory Innervation of the Larval Zebrafish Pectoral Fin.

Authors:  Katharine W Henderson; Alexander Roche; Evdokia Menelaou; Melina E Hale
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.856

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.