Literature DB >> 26347555

Running, hopping and trotting: tuning step frequency to the resonant frequency of the bouncing system favors larger animals.

Giovanni A Cavagna1, Mario A Legramandi2.   

Abstract

A long-lasting challenge in comparative physiology is to understand why the efficiency of the mechanical work done to maintain locomotion increases with body mass. It has been suggested that this is due to a more elastic step in larger animals. Here, we show in running, hopping and trotting animals, and in human running during growth, that the resonant frequency of the bouncing system decreases with increasing body mass and is, surprisingly, independent of species or gait. Step frequency roughly equals the resonant frequency in trotting and running, whereas it is about half the resonant frequency in hopping. The energy loss by elastic hysteresis during loading and unloading the bouncing system from its equilibrium position decreases with increasing body mass. Similarity to a symmetrical bounce increases with increasing body mass and, for a given body mass, seems to be maximal in hopping, intermediate in trotting and minimal in running. We conclude that: (1) tuning step frequency to the resonant frequency of the bouncing system coincides with a lower hysteresis loss in larger, more-compliant animals; (2) the mechanism of gait per se affects similarity with a symmetrical bounce, independent of hysteresis; and (3) the greater efficiency in larger animals may be due, at least in part, to a lower hysteresis loss.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bouncing gaits; Efficiency; Elasticity; Hysteresis; Locomotion; Symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347555     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.127142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Terrestrial locomotion energy costs vary considerably between species: no evidence that this is explained by rate of leg force production or ecology.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Craig R White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gomes da Rosa; Henrique Bianchi Oliveira; Natalia Andrea Gomeñuka; Marcos Paulo Bienert Masiero; Edson Soares da Silva; Ana Paula Janner Zanardi; Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho; Pedro Schons; Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Sacral acceleration can predict whole-body kinetics and stride kinematics across running speeds.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; Evan M Day; Michael E Hahn; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effects of load carriage on physiological determinants in adventure racers.

Authors:  Alex de O Fagundes; Elren P Monteiro; Leandro T Franzoni; Bruna S Fraga; Patrícia D Pantoja; Gabriela Fischer; Leonardo A Peyré-Tartaruga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Properties of traditional bamboo carrying poles have implications for user interactions.

Authors:  Ryan T Schroeder; James L Croft; Giang D Ngo; John E A Bertram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.