Literature DB >> 26347071

Cancer (stem) cell differentiation: An inherent or acquired property?

Marieke Mohr1, Kurt S Zänker1, Thomas Dittmar2.   

Abstract

There is a growing list of data indicating that cancer (stem) cells could functionally adapt foreign tissue features, such as endothelial-like cells or neuroendocrine cells, express lineage markers or could differentiate into various lineages in response to appropriate differentiation criteria. The finding that cancer (stem) cells may possess some kind of differentiation capacity poses the question whether this might be an inherent or acquired property. Cancer stem cells share stem cell characteristics and may thus possess an inherent differentiation capacity enabling the cells to respond to various differentiation stimuli. Considering the plasticity of cancer (stem) cells, even non-tumorigenic (and putatively non-differentiable) tumor cells could give rise to tumorigenic tumor stem cells, exhibiting stem cell characteristics including an inherent differentiation capacity. On the contrary, cancer (stem) cells may have acquired differentiation capacity as a consequence of a previous cell fusion event with cell types exhibiting differentiation potential and being fusogenic, such as macrophages or stem cells. Of pivotal interest in a tumor context are macrophages, which chiefly foster the chronically inflamed tumor microenvironment. Because chronically inflamed tissue is a well-known trigger for cell fusion and both macrophages and stem cells are highly fusogenic we conclude that cell fusion events between these cell types and cancer (stem) cells should frequently occur, thereby giving rise to hybrid cells exhibiting not only novel properties, like an enhanced metastatogenic phenotype, but also parental characteristics, such as differentiation capacity. Conceivably, the combination of both properties might be advantageous for metastasizing cancer (stem) cells to adapt better and faster to a foreign organ tissue environment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347071     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  6 in total

1.  Kinins in Glioblastoma Microenvironment.

Authors:  Mona N Oliveira; Barbara Breznik; Micheli M Pillat; Ricardo L Pereira; Henning Ulrich; Tamara T Lah
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  Kinin-B1 Receptor Stimulation Promotes Invasion and is Involved in Cell-Cell Interaction of Co-Cultured Glioblastoma and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Mona N Oliveira; Micheli M Pillat; Helena Motaln; Henning Ulrich; Tamara T Lah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Photobiomodulation of breast and cervical cancer stem cells using low-intensity laser irradiation.

Authors:  N E Kiro; M R Hamblin; H Abrahamse
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Nano-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer: Enhancement of Cancer Specificity and Therapeutic Effects.

Authors:  Ivan Mfouo Tynga; Heidi Abrahamse
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Molecular Docking as a Therapeutic Approach for Targeting Cancer Stem Cell Metabolic Processes.

Authors:  Babak Arjmand; Shayesteh Kokabi Hamidpour; Sepideh Alavi-Moghadam; Hanieh Yavari; Ainaz Shahbazbadr; Mostafa Rezaei Tavirani; Kambiz Gilany; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 6.  The Dark Side of Cell Fusion.

Authors:  Daniel Bastida-Ruiz; Kylie Van Hoesen; Marie Cohen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.