Literature DB >> 26346789

Identifying employed multiple sclerosis patients at-risk for job loss: When do negative work events pose a threat?

Victoria M Kordovski1, Seth E Frndak1, Carrie S Fisher1, Jonathan Rodgers1, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman1, Ralph H B Benedict2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical disability and cognitive impairment are significant predictors of unemployment in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, little is known about the frequency of work problems in employed patients, in comparison to employed healthy persons.
OBJECTIVE: Use an online monitoring tool to compare the frequency of negative work events in MS patients and healthy controls, and determine a threshold at which the frequency of work problems is clinically meaningful.
METHODS: The sample comprised 138 MS patients and 62 healthy controls. All reported on recent negative work events and accommodations using an online survey. The clinical test battery measured depression, motor and cognitive function. Statistical tests compared the frequency of work problems in MS patients and healthy controls. Clinical neuro-performance scales were then assessed in at-risk patients with many work problems, versus those with no work problems.
RESULTS: As a group, employed MS patients exhibited deficits in motor ability, verbal memory, and processing speed and were more likely than controls to report negative work events and accommodations. At-risk patients, that is, those reporting more than one negative work event, had more pronounced motor and cognitive deficits than their relatively stable counterparts.
CONCLUSION: The data show that employed MS patients report more negative work events and accommodations than employed healthy persons. Those patients deemed at risk for job loss have more cognitive and motor impairment, suggesting the need for cognitive training and specific accommodation strategies in the work place.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Disability; Employment; Multiple sclerosis; Negative work events; Work accommodations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26346789     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  10 in total

1.  Operationalizing and evaluating the Frascati criteria for functional decline in diagnosing HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in adults.

Authors:  Anastasia Matchanova; Steven Paul Woods; Victoria M Kordovski
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 2.  Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jasin Wong; Natasha Kallish; Deborah Crown; Pamela Capraro; Robert Trierweiler; Q Eileen Wafford; Laurine Tiema-Benson; Shahzeb Hassan; Edeth Engel; Christina Tamayo; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-22

3.  Brief and cost-effective tool for assessing verbal learning in multiple sclerosis: Comparison of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) to the California Verbal Learning Test - II (CVLT-II).

Authors:  Meghan Beier; Abbey J Hughes; Michael W Williams; Elizabeth S Gromisch
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Occupational outcomes of people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bruno Kusznir Vitturi; Alborz Rahmani; Guglielmo Dini; Alfredo Montecucco; Nicoletta Debarbieri; Elvira Sbragia; Paolo Bandiera; Michela Ponzio; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Tommaso Manacorda; Benedetta Persechino; Giuliana Buresti; Matilde Inglese; Paolo Durando
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The Relationship between Psychosocial Factors and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Fahad D Alosaimi; Alaa AlMulhem; Mario Moscovici; Hanan AlShalan; Mohammad Alqazlan; Abdulgader Aldaif; Sanjeev Sockalingam
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  Coping strategies in relation to negative work events and accommodations in employed multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  K van der Hiele; Dam van Gorp; Rhb Benedict; P J Jongen; Epj Arnoldus; Eac Beenakker; H M Bos; Jjj van Eijk; J Fermont; Stfm Frequin; B M van Geel; Gjd Hengstman; E Hoitsma; Rmm Hupperts; J P Mostert; Phm Pop; Wim Verhagen; D Zemel; S E Frndak; Map Heerings; Ham Middelkoop; L H Visser
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2016-11-24

Review 7.  Employment of patients with multiple sclerosis: the influence of psychosocial-structural coping and context.

Authors:  Lavanya Vijayasingham; Fatima Fanna Mairami
Journal:  Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2018-03-26

8.  Predictors of Change in Employment Status and Associations with Quality of Life: A Prospective International Study of People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Claudia H Marck; Zoe Aitken; Steve Simpson; Tracey J Weiland; Anne Kavanagh; George A Jelinek
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-03

Review 9.  Stigma, Discrimination and Disclosure of the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in the Workplace: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bruno Kusznir Vitturi; Alborz Rahmani; Guglielmo Dini; Alfredo Montecucco; Nicoletta Debarbieri; Paolo Bandiera; Michela Ponzio; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Benedetta Persechino; Matilde Inglese; Paolo Durando
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 10.  Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care.

Authors:  Rosalind Kalb; Meghan Beier; Ralph Hb Benedict; Leigh Charvet; Kathleen Costello; Anthony Feinstein; Jeffrey Gingold; Yael Goverover; June Halper; Colleen Harris; Lori Kostich; Lauren Krupp; Ellen Lathi; Nicholas LaRocca; Ben Thrower; John DeLuca
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 6.312

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.