| Literature DB >> 26346743 |
Son Truong Nguyen1, Masaharu Motokawa, Tatsuo Oshida, Hideki Endo.
Abstract
Southeast Asia is a region of high biodiversity, containing species of plants and animals that are yet to be discovered. In this region, bats of the subfamily Kerivoulinae are widespread and diverse with six species recorded in Vietnam. However, the taxonomy of the Kerivoulinae in Asia is complicated. In our study, we used diagnostic characters and multivariate analysis to determine morphological differences between the genera Kerivoula and Phoniscus. We showed that the two genera are distinguishable by the size of second upper incisors, the shape of skull, nasal sinus, canines, second upper and lower premolars. In addition, the two genera can be osteometrically separated by measurements of the braincase height, interorbital width and shape of anterior palatal emargination. Our data clearly revealed the morphological variations in the skull shape of Kerivoula hardwickii in Vietnam. This suggests a possible separation into three morphotypes, representing cryptic species supported by statistical differences with wide variation in skull shape, size and teeth. These results demonstrated Kerivoula hardwickii can be separated three subspecies, and the result will serve as the basis for the future assessment and classification of this group in Southeast Asia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26346743 PMCID: PMC4785106 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
List of craniodental measurements used in this study and their abbreviations
| Cranium | |
|---|---|
| Greatest length of skull, the greatest antero-posterior length of the skull, taken from the most projecting point at each extremity | GTL |
| Condylo-canine length, from an exoccipital condyle to the anterior edge of the anterior canine | CCL |
| Anterior palatal width (least distance between the outer borders of the upper canines) | UCCW |
| Posterior palatal width: greatest width across the outer border first upper premolars from their buccal borders | UP2P2W |
| Posterior palatal width: Greatest width across the outer border second upper premolars from their buccal borders | UP3P3W |
| Greatest width across the outer border third upper premolars from their buccal borders | UP4P4W |
| External palatal width, taken across the outer border of the third upper molar, taken at the widest part. | M3M3W |
| Upper canine-premolar length (from the front of the upper canine to the back of the crown of the posterior third upper premolar) | CP4L |
| Maxillary toothrow length (distance from the front of upper canine to the back of the crown of the third upper molar) | CM3L |
| Molariform toothrow length, from the posterior upper premolar to the last upper molar | P4M3L |
| Palatal width | PALW |
| Palatal length | PBL |
| Width between the cochleae | BasW |
| Interorbital width (least width of the interorbital constriction) | IOW |
| Zygomatic width (greatest width of the skull across the zygomatic arches | ZYW |
| Breadth of braincase at the posterior roots of zygomatic arches | BB |
| Greatest width of the braincase | GBCW |
| Mastoid width (greatest distance across the mastoid region) | MAW |
| Braincase height (from the basisphenoid at the level of the hamular processes to the highest part of the skull) | BCH |
| Mandible | |
| Mandible length (distance from the anterior rim of the alveolus of the first lower incisor to the most posterior part of the condyle) | ML |
| Mandibular tooth row length (distance from the front of the lower canine to the back of the crown of the third lower molar) | cm3L |
| Lower canine-premolar length (distance from the front of the lower canine to the back of the crown of the posterior third lower premolar) | cp4L |
| Least height of the coronoid process (distance from the tip of the coronoid process to the apex of the indentation on the inferior surface of the ramus adjacent to the angular process) | CPH |
Fig. 1.Dorsal (A), ventral (B), lateral (C) and posterior (D) views of the cranium and mandible (E) and upper (F) dentition showing measurements (see Table 1).
Specimens examined for study
Species, sex composition and locality of the specimens used in this study
| Speciesa) | Symbol of species | Sample | Traditionally-accepted species | Geographic distribution followed [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | ||||
| K | 30 | 8 | [ | Northern, Center and Center highland Plateau. | |
| N | 21 | 18 | [ | The Northern of Vietnam from North Eastern, North Western and Red River Delta | |
| C | 13 | 4 | [ | From multiple geographical sites in the center of Vietnam. | |
| S | 8 | 10 | [ | South Eastern and Mekong Delta included Phu Quoc and Condao island. | |
| P | 3 | 2 | [ | Only recorded in the South Eastern and Mekong Delta included Phu Quoc and Condao island. | |
| pi | 1 | 1 | [ | Widespread species | |
| T | 35 | 14 | [ | Northern to North Center Coast, South central Coast, Central Highland Plateau | |
| J | 2 | 2 | [ | Northern and Southern | |
a) K. hardwickii is separated to three geographic population.
Fig. 2.Map showing specimen localities of three K. hardwickii populations from Vietnam. N: northern populations. S: southern populations. C: widely distributed populations, from multiple geographical sites in central of Vietnam. Symbols are explained in Table 2.
Minimum, maximum, mean values (mm) and standard deviations for craniometric measurement in various populations of Kerivoulinae in Vietnam
Fig. 3.Range (minimum value to maximum value in boxplots) (mm) and mean value (in horizontal bar) (mm) of greatest length of the skull (A) and mandible length (B). The line the top and bottom of boxplot: maximum and minimum values. The horizontal line within the boxes indicated medium value. Symbols are explained in Table 2.
Character factor loadings for principal components analysis of the log-transformed raw data (PCs 1) and log-transformed standardized data (PCs 1, 2 and 3) of Kerivoulinae populations from Vietnam
| Measurement | Raw data | Standardized data | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Female | Male | |||||||
| PC 1 | PC 1 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |||
| GTL | 0.198 | 0.196 | –0.024 | 0.001 | –0.015 | –0.027 | –0.029 | 0.074 | ||
| CCL | 0.008 | 0.023 | 0.031 | –0.063 | 0.014 | 0.074 | ||||
| UCCW | 0.097 | –0.114 | 0.177 | |||||||
| UP2P2W | 0.150 | 0.109 | 0.133 | 0.054 | ||||||
| UP3P3W | 0.069 | 0.076 | 0.054 | –0.106 | 0.011 | –0.246 | ||||
| UP4P4W | 0.196 | 0.183 | 0.047 | 0.103 | 0.137 | –0.099 | –0.058 | –0.298 | ||
| M3M3W | 0.203 | 0.187 | 0.039 | 0.064 | 0.056 | –0.077 | –0.085 | –0.154 | ||
| CP4L | 0.079 | –0.076 | 0.175 | 0.250 | ||||||
| CM3L | 0.117 | –0.154 | –0.041 | 0.024 | 0.195 | 0.086 | ||||
| P4M3L | 0.121 | –0.131 | –0.108 | –0.042 | 0.079 | –0.057 | ||||
| PALW | 0.148 | 0.129 | –0.062 | |||||||
| PBL | 0.109 | –0.032 | 0.017 | 0.030 | 0.073 | 0.231 | ||||
| BasW | 0.027 | |||||||||
| IOW | 0.090 | 0.114 | 0.081 | –0.023 | 0.113 | |||||
| ZYW | 0.040 | –0.009 | –0.006 | 0.009 | 0.037 | –0.087 | ||||
| BB | 0.158 | 0.170 | –0.169 | 0.117 | –0.092 | 0.007 | –0.184 | 0.060 | ||
| GBCW | 0.122 | 0.131 | 0.132 | –0.177 | –0.105 | 0.106 | ||||
| MAW | 0.152 | 0.151 | –0.183 | 0.101 | –0.110 | –0.018 | –0.218 | 0.097 | ||
| BCH | 0.117 | 0.171 | –0.028 | –0.168 | –0.135 | |||||
| ML | 0.118 | –0.062 | 0.064 | 0.025 | 0.163 | 0.113 | ||||
| cm3L | 0.149 | –0.206 | –0.049 | 0.050 | 0.161 | |||||
| cp4L | 0.023 | 0.029 | 0.065 | |||||||
| CPH | 0.058 | 0.082 | –0.081 | |||||||
| Eigenvalue | 0.039 | 0.032 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.001 | ||
| % variance | 86.05 | 83.1 | 30.13 | 18.75 | 13.89 | 25.48 | 23.62 | 12.25 | ||
Boldface numerals: High factor loading.
Fig. 4.Range (minimum value to maximum value in boxplots) and mean value (in horizontal bar) of PC1 scores of log-transformed raw data of Kerivoulinae populations from Vietnam. The line the top and bottom of boxplot: maximum and minimum values. The horizontal line within the boxes indicated medium value. Symbols are explained in Table 2.
Fig. 5.Scatterplots of scores of the first principal component axes based on log-transformed raw data indicated the significant differences of the size of the females and the males of Kerivoulinae populations from Vietnam. Symbols are explained in Table 2.
Fig. 6.Scatterplots of scores of the first and second principal component axes based on log-transformed standardized data for females and males of Kerivoulinae populations from Vietnam. Symbols are explained in Table 2.
Coefficients of the discriminate function for canonical variate analysis of the log-transformed standardized data (CVs 1, 2) of Kerivoulinae populations from Vietnam
| Measurement | Female | Male | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV1 | CV2 | CV1 | CV2 | |
| GTL | –28.86 | –28.74 | ||
| CCL | –11.13 | |||
| UCCW | 24.71 | –9.15 | ||
| UP2P2W | 15.7 | 6.83 | 36.7 | |
| UP3P3W | 25.18 | 4.7 | 23.02 | |
| UP4P4W | –4.43 | –27.49 | ||
| M3M3W | –16.31 | –3.07 | 17.32 | 15.29 |
| CP4L | 6.64 | 1.2 | ||
| CM3L | 4.66 | |||
| P4M3L | –12.48 | 7.08 | 28.07 | –2.9 |
| PALW | 3.98 | 2.56 | 20.7 | –27.23 |
| PBL | –6.86 | 17.15 | –3.28 | 27.22 |
| BasW | –1.02 | 5.27 | 17.9 | –1.65 |
| IOW | –8.32 | |||
| ZYW | –20.96 | –9.02 | 16.78 | |
| BB | 15.46 | –6.28 | –4.56 | –48.76 |
| GBCW | 15.23 | |||
| MAW | 27.16 | –2.33 | –17.18 | |
| BCH | 15.63 | 7.76 | ||
| ML | –14.01 | 34.27 | 53.76 | |
| cm3L | 11.6 | |||
| cp4L | –10.46 | –19.71 | 13.55 | 39.16 |
| CPH | –19.18 | 0.45 | –11.53 | 31.77 |
| Percentage variation | 38.83 | 38.07 | 56.07 | 22.24 |
Boldface numerals: High (positive and negative) coefficients of the discriminate function.
Fig. 7.The visualized results of the canonical variate analysis among Kerivoulinae populations and included three populations of K. hardwickii. Scattergrams showing the individual scores on the discriminant axes 1 (horizontal) and 2 (vertical). The locality symbols are explained in Table 2. Female) the first function comprises 38.83% of the variance and the second function 38.07%. Male) the first function comprises 56.07% of the variance and the second function 22.24%.
Fig. 8.Scatter plots between braincase height and greatest width of the braincase ratio (A, D), (x axis: %; y axis: mm) Interorbital width and greatest width of the braincase ratio (B) and anterior palatal width and posterior palatal width (C) (x axis: %; y axis: mm) of Kerivoulinae populations and the differences of characters BCH and CM3L of Kerivoula hardwickii populations (E). Symbol for each species is the same as Table 2.
Differences in size of braincase high and maxillary toothrow length and shape of first (P2) and second upper premolars (P3) of K. hardwickii populations
| Character | N flattened braincase | N, C and S slightly domed braincase | S distincly domed braincase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size of P2, P3 | Small, P2>P3 | Small, P2>P3 | Large, P2=P3 |
| Shape of P2, P3 | Circular | Circular or ovate | Ovate |
| P2 | Inner circular | Inner circular or oval | Inner oval |
| Outnet circular | Outer slightly traight | Outer oval | |
| P3 | Inner circular | Inner circular | Inner oval |
| Outer circular | Outer slightly circular | Outer circular | |
| Transverse diameters P2, P3 | Equal their longitudinal diameters | Equal, exceeding their longitudinal diameters | Exceeding their longitudinal diameters |
| BCH (mm) | Less 4.7 | 4.89–5.60 | Over 5.7 |
| CM3L (mm) | Less 5.36 | 4.90–5.60 | Over 5.36 |