| Literature DB >> 26346309 |
Mei-Fei Zhu1, Xi Xing1, Shu Lei1, Jian-Nong Wu1, Ling-Cong Wang1, Li-Quan Huang1, Rong-Lin Jiang1.
Abstract
Sepsis results in high morbidity and mortality. Immunomodulation strategies could be an adjunctive therapy to treat sepsis. Acupuncture has also been used widely for many years in China to treat sepsis. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well-defined. We demonstrated here that EA preconditioning at ST36 obviously ameliorated CLP-induced intestinal injury and high permeability and reduced the mortality of CLP-induced sepsis rats. Moreover, electroacupuncture (EA) pretreatment exerted protective effects on intestinal mucosal immune barrier by increasing the concentration of sIgA and the percentage of CD3+, γ/δ, and CD4+ T cells and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells. Although EA at ST36 treatments immediately after closing the abdomen in the CLP procedure with low-frequency or high-frequency could not reduce the mortality of CLP-induced sepsis in rats, these EA treatments could also significantly improve intestinal injury index in rats with sepsis and obviously protected intestinal mucosal immune barrier. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that EA at ST36 could improve intestinal mucosal immune barrier in sepsis induced by CLP, while the precise mechanism underlying the effects needs to be further elucidated.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26346309 PMCID: PMC4539462 DOI: 10.1155/2015/639412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1EA preconditioning therapy improved the survival rate in a rat model of sepsis induced by CLP. The percentage survival in 72 hours after surgery is shown.
Figure 2EA at ST36 ameliorates CLP-induced intestinal injury. (a) Ileums were harvested 36 h after CLP for histopathologic examination using H&E staining. Representative images from five animals per group were shown. (b) Semiquantitative analysis of histological samples of ileum showed that EA at ST36 significantly decreased CLP-induced intestinal injury. (c) Effects of EA on the concentration of D-Lactose in the serum. Data were presented as means ± SD (n = 5) and # p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05, and ∗∗ p < 0.01 difference with sham or sepsis group.
Figure 3Changes of sIgA content in intestinal mucosa cells. Data were presented as means ± SD (n = 5) and # p < 0.01 and ∗ p < 0.05 difference with sham or sepsis group.
Figure 4Effects of EA on percentage of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocytes in intestinal mucosa. Data were presented as means ± SD (n = 5) and # p < 0.01 and ∗ p < 0.05 difference with sham or sepsis group.