BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. Non-elastic taping (NET) and kinesiology taping (KT) are common interventions used by physiotherapists. However, evidence regarding their efficacy is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence on the clinical efficacy of taping, either NET or KT, for the treatment of individuals with RC tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in four bibliographical databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared NET or KT to any other intervention or placebo for treatment of RC tendinopathy. Internal validity of RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A qualitative or quantitative synthesis of evidence was performed. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the present review on overall pain reduction or improvement in function. Most RCTs had a high risk of bias. There is inconclusive evidence for NET, either used alone or in conjunction with another intervention. Based on pooled results of two studies (n=72), KT used alone resulted in significant gain in pain free flexion (MD: 8.7 ° 95%CI 8.0 ° to 9.5 °) and in pain free abduction (MD: 10.3 ° 95%CI 9.1 ° to 11.4 °). Based on qualitative analyses, there is inconclusive evidence on the efficacy of KT when used alone or in conjunction with other interventions on overall pain reduction or improvement in function. CONCLUSION: Although KT significantly improved pain free range of motion, there is insufficient evidence to formally conclude on the efficacy of KT or NET used alone or in conjunction with other interventions in patients with RC tendinopathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1a.
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. Non-elastic taping (NET) and kinesiology taping (KT) are common interventions used by physiotherapists. However, evidence regarding their efficacy is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence on the clinical efficacy of taping, either NET or KT, for the treatment of individuals with RC tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in four bibliographical databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared NET or KT to any other intervention or placebo for treatment of RC tendinopathy. Internal validity of RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A qualitative or quantitative synthesis of evidence was performed. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the present review on overall pain reduction or improvement in function. Most RCTs had a high risk of bias. There is inconclusive evidence for NET, either used alone or in conjunction with another intervention. Based on pooled results of two studies (n=72), KT used alone resulted in significant gain in pain free flexion (MD: 8.7 ° 95%CI 8.0 ° to 9.5 °) and in pain free abduction (MD: 10.3 ° 95%CI 9.1 ° to 11.4 °). Based on qualitative analyses, there is inconclusive evidence on the efficacy of KT when used alone or in conjunction with other interventions on overall pain reduction or improvement in function. CONCLUSION: Although KT significantly improved pain free range of motion, there is insufficient evidence to formally conclude on the efficacy of KT or NET used alone or in conjunction with other interventions in patients with RC tendinopathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1a.
Authors: Patrícia do Carmo Silva Parreira; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Luiz Carlos Hespanhol; Alexandre Dias Lopes; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa Journal: J Physiother Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 7.000
Authors: Amee L Seitz; Philip W McClure; Sheryl Finucane; N Douglas Boardman; Lori A Michener Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Benoît Pairot de Fontenay; Laurent Julien Bouyer; François Desmeules; Jean-Sébastien Roy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mohamed A Abdel Ghafar; Osama R Abdelraouf; Amr A Abdel-Aziem; Gihan Samir Mousa; Ali O Selim; Mariam E Mohamed Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Benoit Pairot de Fontenay; Laurent Julien Bouyer; François Desmeules; Jean-Sébastien Roy Journal: Sports Health Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Paul A Salamh; William J Hanney; Christopher S Cory; Haley E Condon; Xinliang Liu; Morey J Kolber Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2021-06-01