Literature DB >> 26345648

Differences in the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among Korean, Caucasian, and African American men: A retrospective cohort study of radical prostatectomy.

In Gab Jeong1, Daoud Dajani2, Mohan Verghese2, Jonathan Hwang2, Yong Mee Cho3, Jun Hyuk Hong1, Choung-Soo Kim4, Hanjong Ahn1, Jae Y Ro5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the pathologic aggressiveness of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated by radical prostatectomy in Korean and Western (Caucasian and African American [AA]) men by analyzing data from representative hospitals in the capitals of Korea (Seoul) and the United States (Washington, DC).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,939 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa in the Asan Medical Center and Washington Hospital Center. After adjusting for confounding clinical variables, we used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess differences in the aggressiveness of PCa.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1,152 Korean, 473 Caucasian, and 314 AA patients. There were significant differences between Korean and Western patients in terms of age at surgery, preoperative levels of prostate-specific antigen, and clinical stage (P<0.001). Overall, high-grade PCa (Gleason score≥8) was more common in Korean (19.4%) than in AA (6.1%) or Caucasian (5.5%) patients (P<0.001). The incidence of advanced-stage PCa (pT3 or higher) was higher in Korean (34.8%) than in AA (18.2%) or Caucasian (13.3%) patients (P<0.001). After adjusting for age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and clinical stage, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Korean men had a high risk of high-grade PCa (Korean vs. Caucasian, odds ratio [OR] = 3.48, P<0.001; Korean vs. AA, OR=3.14, P<0.001) or advanced-stage PCa (Korean vs. Caucasian, OR=2.40, P<0.001; Korean vs. AA, OR = 1.59, P = 0.009) than Western men.
CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in PCa aggressiveness between Korean and Western men. The incidence of high-grade or advanced-stage PCa is higher in Korean men.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoplasm grading; Neoplasm staging; Prostatic neoplasm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26345648     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  21 in total

1.  Is it appropriate to conduct conventional active surveillance for Asian men with low-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Ming Xu; Li Zhang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Predictors for the detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer using TRUS-guided biopsy in patients with negative initial biopsy results.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Juhyun Park; Sung Yong Cho; Min Chul Cho; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hwancheol Son; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Hyo Choi; Ji Woong Yu; Min Yong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Polygenic risk score for genetic evaluation of prostate cancer risk in Asian populations: A narrative review.

Authors:  Sang Hun Song; Seok Soo Byun
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

5.  Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Korea: A Multicenter Analysis of Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok Soo Byun; Seong Soo Jeon; Seong Il Seo; Hyun Moo Lee; Hanjong Ahn; Dong Deuk Kwon; Hong Koo Ha; Tae Gyun Kwon; Jae Seung Chung; Cheol Kwak; Hyung Jin Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 6.  Updates on Cancer Epidemiology in Korea, 2018.

Authors:  Sun-Seog Kweon
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Hwang Gyun Jeon; Jae Ho Yoo; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han-Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee; Michelle Ferrari; James D Brooks; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of Recurrence-associated Death from Localized Prostate Cancer with a Charlson Comorbidity Index-reinforced Machine Learning Model.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Lin; Michael Tian-Shyug Lee; Yen-Chun Huang; Chih-Kuang Liu; Yi-Tien Li; Mingchih Chen
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-08-14

9.  Current Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rate of Urological Cancers in Korea.

Authors:  Jae Young Joung; Jiwon Lim; Chang-Mo Oh; Kyu-Won Jung; Hyunsoon Cho; Sung Han Kim; Ho Kyung Seo; Weon Seo Park; Jinsoo Chung; Kang Hyun Lee; Young-Joo Won
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Lifestyle Risk Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Sohee Kim; Jae Young Joung; Whi-An Kwon; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Byung-Ho Nam; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.