Literature DB >> 26345314

Eliglustat tartrate for the treatment of adults with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Lunawati L Bennett1, Kelsey Turcotte1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review eliglustat tartrate, a substrate reduction therapy, for the treatment of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1). GD is an rare inborn error of metabolism caused by accumulation of lipid substrates such as glucosylceramide within the monocyte-macrophage system that affects the body by causing enlargement of the spleen and liver, destruction of bone, and abnormalities of the lungs and blood, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. GD is classified into three types: GD1, a chronic and non-neuronopathic disease accounting for 95% of GD cases; and types 2 and 3 (GD2 GD3) which are more progressive diseases with no approved drugs available at this time. Treatment options for GD1 include enzyme replacement therapy and substrate reduction therapy. Eliglustat works by inhibiting UDP-glucosylceramide synthase, the first enzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of glycosphingolipids, thus reducing the load of glucosylceramide influx into the lysosome. Eliglustat was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration after three Phase I, two Phase II, and two Phase III clinical trials. The dose of eliglustat is 84 mg twice a day or once daily depending on the cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaucher disease; eliglustat tartrate; glucocerebrosidase; glucosylceramide synthase; substrate reduction therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26345314      PMCID: PMC4554398          DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S77760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther        ISSN: 1177-8881            Impact factor:   4.162


Introduction

Gaucher disease (GD), an extremely rare inherited autosomal recessive lipid storage disease (LSD), was first described by Philippe Gaucher in 1882.1 This was the first identified LSD caused by deficiency or absence of activity of the enzyme acid β-glucosidase, also known as β-glucocerebrosidase or glucosylceramidase E.C.3.2.1.45 (GBA1), leading to accumulation of glucocerebroside, also known as glucosylceramide (GLC) in tissue monocyte macrophages.2 Treatment options for GD include enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and substrate reduction therapy (SRT). To date, there are three ERTs available: imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, and taliglucerase alfa, and two SRTs available, miglustat and the newest drug, eliglustat tartrate. These have been approved as orphan drugs for the treatment of GD. This review summarizes the epidemiology of the disease, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and useful biomarkers, and the treatment options available for GD1 with a focus on eliglustat. Supportive care and cost of therapies are also briefly discussed.

Epidemiology and pathophysiology of GD

GD is a systemic metabolic disorder caused by accumulation of the lipid substrate GLC within the monocyte-macrophage system, resulting in formation of Gaucher cells. These cells are the hallmark of the disease and are found in many organs, mostly in bone, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and lymph node parenchyma.3–8 Accumulation of Gaucher cells can also enhance production of inflammatory cytokines, which cause enlargement of the spleen and liver, destruction of bone, abnormalities of the lungs, and anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.3–8 Gaucher cells are about 20–100 µm in diameter, have small eccentric nuclei, and cytoplasm with crinkles and striation.7 GD affects males and females equally. GD is classified into GD1 (non-neuronopathic), GD2 (acute neuronopathic), and GD3 (chronic neuronopathic) according to the presence of neurological deterioration, age at identification, and rate of disease progression.9,10 Patients with GD2 or GD3 manifest more severe complications than those with GD1, and many of these patients died at a very young age or in early adulthood.5,9,10 GD1 occurs mainly in adults, accounting for 95% of cases. If the onset of GD occurs prior to adulthood, more rapidly progressive disease is likely.11 The National Gaucher Foundation estimated the incidence of GD1 in the USA to be about one in 20,000 live births, or a prevalence of one in 40,000.12 The incidence of GD may be as high as one in 450 births among individuals with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry and 1:20,000 to 1:200,000 in the general population.13–16 The initial manifestations of GD normally start with splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.17 Further progression involves gastrointestinal complications, such as portal hypertension, cirrhosis, ascites, esophageal hemorrhage, and bone lesions manifested as chronic bone pain, skeletal deformities, osteonecrosis, osteopenia, and osteoarticular infections.17–22 Increased risk of cholelithiasis is present in women older than 40 years.17 Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, polyclonal gammopathy, and peripheral neuropathy have also been observed in GD1 patients.17,21–24 The pathophysiology of GD possibly includes enzyme, gene, and/or lysosome packing defects.7,25–29 Defects in the function of lysosomes result in missorting or loss of function of lysosomal proteins.26 Normal lysosomal proteins are usually tagged with a carbohydrate that allows their recognition and transport via the mannose-6-phosphate receptor.25,27 However, mutation in mannose-6-phosphate has been identified in GD patients.25,27,28 Additionally, one of the lysosomal hydrolases, GBA1, which is important for degradation of GLC into glucose and ceramide, was found to be defective/deficient and this enzyme is improperly packed in GD patients, leading to accumulation of GLC in the monocyte-macrophage system.7,27,30

Diagnosis and biomarkers

GD is normally diagnosed during initial clinical examination by the presence of unexpected anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organomegaly.9 Clinical diagnoses are confirmed by biochemical diagnosis.7 Detection of low enzymatic activity of GBA1 in peripheral blood compared with normal controls is still the “gold standard” for diagnosing GD. Despite the availability of this testing for nearly four decades, many patients are still incorrectly diagnosed.9,19,31 The assay is performed in 10 cc of blood leukocytes using a fluorescent substrate, 4-methyumbelliferone β-glucosidase. The sample can be shipped at ambient temperature overnight to diagnostic laboratories.19,32–34 Biomarkers can add quality assurance to biochemical diagnosis. Ongoing studies are being conducted to detect useful protein biomarkers for GD through a survey of the protein composition of body fluids, cells, and tissue specimens from symptomatic Gaucher patients. Non-specific biomarkers such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, angiotensin-converting enzyme, hexosaminidase, and cathepsin K have been used for routine monitoring; however, these biomarkers are also observed in healthy individuals.35–37 Increases in interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and soluble CD 163 have also been used as biomarkers for GD; however, corrections in plasma MIP-1α and MIP-1β after treatment are not proportional to those found with true Gaucher cell biomarkers.7,38–40 Activated macrophages also cause secretion of the enzyme chitotriosidase (CT), which plays a role during the remodeling phase of tissue healing and in immune chemotaxis.41,42 CT, a macrophage-derived chitin-fragmenting hydrolase, is abundantly expressed in lipid macrophages. Common tissue macrophages do not produce CT.8,25 Patients with diseases such as LSD, sarcoidosis, thalassemia, visceral leishmaniasis, and leprosy have been identified to have elevated CT levels.25,41,42 Recently, plasma CT has been used as the first screening test in diagnosing GD. In patients with high clinical severity scores, CT levels were usually greater than 20,000 nmol/mL/hour.43,44 After treatment, the CT value is expected to decrease. However, even after treatment, more severely affected patients will have less reduction in their plasma CT activity. A smaller than expected reduction in plasma CT activity after the initial treatment can also be used as a clinical parameter to increase the dose of drugs being used, such as ERTs or SRTs.43 Massive overproduction and secretion of pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokines (PARC/CCL18), which are elevated by 10- to 40-fold in symptomatic patients with GD, can also be used as a biomarker.45,46 Because PARC/CCL18 is a small molecule, its level in urine is proportional to the level in the circulation.47 Measurement of plasma PARC/CCL18 has been a useful additional tool to monitor changes in Gaucher cells and as a useful tool for evaluating GD patients who are CT-deficient.48 Therefore, regular monitoring of CT or PARC/CCL18 in CT-deficient patients, along with radiological monitoring of the bone marrow and skeleton, and other sensitive assays are needed to confirm the diagnostic of GD and to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. As part of their search for a better biomarker for GD, Rolfs et al have patented glucosylsphingosine as being more specific and sensitive than CT and PARC/CCL18 as a biomarker in normal subjects, GD patients, GD carriers, and patients with other LSDs.49 The glucosylsphingosine from plasma is labeled with fluorescent dye, and total and free glucosylsphingosine is then detected by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography and a fluorescence detector. GD patients show elevated glucosylsphingosine above 12 ng/mL as compare to non-GD patients. Glucosylsphingosine can measure 100% sensitivity compare to CT or PAR/CCL18 at 91.7% or 76.2%, respectively; and 100% specificity as compared with CT or PAR/CCL18 at 86.1% or 79.4%, respectively.49 The severity of GD1 is usually classified using the Gaucher disease severity score index-type I (GauSSI-I).44 This scoring index was developed to provide a thorough and reliable method for correlating differences in genotypes and phenotypes of patients, to correlate patients’ response to biological markers, and to account for variability in clinical response and severity of disease. There are six domains, ie, skeletal, hematological, biomarker, visceral, lung, and neurological, giving a total score of 42 points. A higher score indicates more severe GD.44 For detailed information on classification of GauSSI-I, please refer to DiRocco et al.44

Therapeutic options

Five treatments are available for GD, comprising three ERTs and two SRTs. The available ERTs are: imiglucerase (Cerezyme®), velaglucerase alfa (VPRIV®), and taliglucerase alfa (Elelyso®). ERTs work by supplementing defective GBA1 with the active enzyme, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of GLC into glucose and ceramide, thus reducing the amount of GLC accumulated in the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and other organs.50,51 All ERTs are given as an intravenous infusion, which makes this therapeutic option costly and inconvenient. The two small molecule SRTs available, ie, miglustat and the newer eliglustat tartrate, are taken as oral drugs. In contrast with ERTs, which aim to replace the defective enzyme with active enzyme, SRTs work by inhibiting UDP-GLC synthase, the first enzyme catalyzing the biosynthesis of glycosphingolipids from UDP-glucose and ceramide, thus reducing the influx of GLC into the lysosome. Figure 1 shows the pathway for synthesis of glycosphingolipids and where eliglustat works.52,53
Figure 1

Synthesis of glycosphingolipids. In Gaucher disease, glucosylceramide accumulates due to a decrease or loss of activity of β-glucocerebrosidase. Eliglustat tartrate blocks the enzyme glucosylceramide synthase. Glucosylceramide synthase is localized in the cis/medial Golgi membrane which plays an important role in catalyzing the formation of glucosylceramide from ceramide and UDP-glucose. Glucosylceramide is further metabolized to other glycosphingolipids (not shown).

Miglustat (Zavesca®, Actelion Pharmaceutical Limited, Allschwil, Switzerland), the first SRT, is a synthetic d-glucose analog.54,55 The drug was approved in Europe, Australia, and the USA for treatment of mild to moderate GD3. However, miglustat also inhibits other glucosides, so comes with a higher incidence of adverse reactions, such as tremor (30%), diarrhea (85%), weight loss (65%), reduced platelet counts, numbness, and a feeling of burning in the hands and feet.54–57 Because of the essential roles of glycosphingolipids, long-term reduction in levels of these lipids affects a variety of normal cell functions.58 Miglustat is now only approved in Europe, Israel, Australia, and the USA for patients who cannot take ERTs due to anaphylactic reactions.7 This led to the formulation of eliglustat tartrate (GENZ 112638) by the Michigan Group and licensing of this compound for clinical development by Genzyme Corporation.52,53

Eliglustat tartrate

Eliglustat tartrate is a potent ceramide analog and has a selective inhibitory action on GLC synthase. This compound was found to be effective in reducing GLC in a murine model of GD (GBA D409/null).52,53,59–62 Eliglustat caused decrease GLC and infiltration of abnormal macrophages in the tissues in concentration dependent manner.62 The structure of eliglustat is similar to that of d-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino 3-morpholino-propanol.52,58 Eliglustat tartrate (Cardelga®) is manufactured by Genzyme Corporation (a subsidiary of Sanofi), and received approval in the USA on August 19, 2014 for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced adult patients with GD1.63–67 Table 1 lists the features of eliglustat and Table 2 compares the characteristics of miglustat with those of eliglustat.63–67
Table 1

Features and properties of eliglustat

Class2-ring-heterocyclic compound, amides, pyrrolidines, small molecules.
Chemical nameOctanamide, N-((1R,2R)-1-(2,3-dihydrobenzo [b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-1-hydroxy-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl) propan-2-yl) octanamide (2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxysuccinate. Molecular weight 479.59.
PharmacodynamicsIC50 of 10 ng/mL for inhibition of GLC synthase.
PharmacokineticsExposure depends on CYP2D6 phenotype; linear and time-dependent pharmacokinetics and greater than dose-dependent exposure in CYP2D6 EMs and IMs.
Non-time-dependent pharmacokinetics expected in PMs.
Accumulation of drug in PMs was 300%, 400%, and 2,300% for 50, 200, and 350 mg doses, respectively.
tmax (hours): 1.5 (EMs); 3 (PMs).
t1/2 (hours): 6.5 (EMs); 8.9 (PMs).
Cmax: 12.1–25 ng/mL (EMs); 113–137 ng/mL (PMs).
AUC: 76.3–143 h*ng/mL (EMs); 956 h*ng/mL (PMs).
Protein bound: 76%–83%; mainly distributed in plasma, not in red blood cells.
Widely distributed to tissue: 835 L after intravenous administration.
Low oral bioavailability due to significant first-pass metabolism.
MetabolismMainly CYP2D6, less with CY3A4. No active metabolites have been identified.
Excretion: fecal 51.4% and urine 41.8%.
Drug–drug interaction,Eliglustat is a CYP2D6 and CYP3A substrate.
Drug–food interactionUse with CYP3A inducers such as rifampin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, St John’s wort and phenytoin decreases eliglustat levels.
Use with CYP3A inhibitors such as ketoconazole, fluconazole, and ranitidine causes prolongation of PR, QT, and/or QRS intervals, which can cause cardiac arrhythmias. Eliglustat may be contraindicated in some patients depending on their CYP2D6 metabolizer status.
Inhibits P-gp and CYP2D6 drugs such as digoxin, colchicine, dabigatran, metoprolol, TCA, and phenothiazines.
May interact with grapefruit juice.
Food does not affect the pharmacokinetics of eliglustat.
Renal, hepatic impairmentNo dose adjustment in mild renal impairment.
Use of eliglustat is not recommended in patients with moderate to severe impairment, or end-stage renal disease, or any degree of hepatic impairment or cirrhosis.
Formulation, dosingHard gelatin capsule, 100 mg eliglustat tartrate (equivalent of 84 mg eliglustat). The inactive ingredients are microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate, hypromellose, glyceryl behenate, gelatin, candurin silver fine, yellow iron oxide, and FD&C blue 2.
Take one capsule twice daily for EMs and IMs, take one capsule once daily for PMs.

Abbreviations: EMs, extensive metabolizers; IMs, intermediate metabolizers; PMs, poor metabolizers; AUC, area under curve; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; CYP, cytochrome P450; TCA, tricyclic antidepressants; IC50, concentration at which the drug achieves 50% enzyme inhibition; GLC, glucosylceramide.

Table 2

Comparison characteristics of miglustat and eliglustat

Miglustat (Zavesca®)Eliglustat (Cardelga®)
Manufacturer: Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland.Manufacturer: Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mechanism of action: GLC synthase inhibitor.Mechanism of action: GLC synthase inhibitor.
Structure: imino sugar N-butyl-deoxynojirimycin.Structure: d-threo-1-phenyl-2 decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol.
Adverse effects: tremor (30%), diarrhea (85%)*, weight loss (65%), reduced platelet counts, numbness, and feeling of burning on hands and feet.Adverse effects (≥10%): arthralgia, headache, nausea, fatigue, back pain, pain in extremities.Adverse effects (occasional): upper abdominal pain, diarrhea, migraine, flatulence, oropharyngeal pain, dizziness, asthenia, reflux disease, constipation, palpitation, rash.
Pregnancy category: X.Pregnancy category: C.
Dosage: 100 mg capsule taken three times daily or twice daily if patients experience tremor or diarrhea.In moderate renal impairment, start at once-daily dosing.Not recommended in severe renal impairment.Dosage: 84 mg capsules taken twice daily or once daily depending on CYP2D6 genotypes: IMs, EMs, or PMs as detected by a test cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration.
Passes blood–brain barrier, intended to treat neuronopathic GD (GD3), but not showing effectiveness in clinical trials.Does not pass blood–brain barrier.
Approved for patients who cannot take ERTs due to anaphylactic reactions.Approved for GD1 patients.
Contraindication: none.Contraindications: CYP2D6 EMs and IMs taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor with a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor. CYP2D6 IMs and PMs taking a strong CYP3A inhibitor.
Warning and precautions: need to evaluate at baseline and do follow-up neurological testing every 6 months for peripheral neuropathy. Reduce dose if tremor or discontinue treatment if tremor does not resolve after dosage is reduced. Evaluate underlying diarrhea and weight loss after the dose is reduced.Warning and precautions: electrocardiographic changes and potential cardiac arrhythmias. Not recommended in patients with pre-existing cardiac disease, long QT syndrome, and concomitant use of class Ia and class III antiarrhythmics.

Note:

Due to inhibition of intestinal α-disaccharides.

Abbreviations: EMs, extensive metabolizers; IMs, intermediate metabolizers; PMs, poor metabolizers; GD, Gaucher disease; ERT, enzyme replacement therapy; CYP, cytochrome P450; GLC, glucosylceramide.

Clinical trials of eliglustat

Eliglustat tartrate has been studied in three Phase I, two Phase II, and three Phase III trials, with one study ongoing at the time this paper was written.53 The three Phase I studies were performed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of eliglustat in healthy volunteers.52 These studies examined the safety and tolerability of eliglustat in single dose and in multiple dose, and the effect of food on eliglustat. The first Phase I trial used single-dose eliglustat, recruited 99 healthy men aged 18–44 years, and was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. There were 74 participants in the eliglustat group and 24 in the placebo group. The design of the study consisted a 21-day screening period, a 72-hour evaluation period, and a safety follow-up at 9–11 days later. Eliglustat was dosed at 0.01 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg based on allometric scaling data from previous animal studies.67 The second Phase I randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study used multiple doses of eliglustat and recruited 18 men and 18 women aged 18–44 years. The design of the study consisted of a 21-day screening period, a 13-day evaluation period, and a safety follow-up at 19–21 days later. Three eliglustat doses (50 mg, 200 mg, or 350 mg) were given to eight participants in the eliglustat group and to four in the placebo group. Each participant received 21 doses of eliglustat or placebo once daily on days 1, 2, and 12, and twice daily on days 3–11 under fasting conditions.52,67 The next cohort was enrolled after the previous dose of eliglustat was determined to be safe and tolerable. The third Phase I trial recruited 24 men aged 19–43 years and was designed to study the effect of food on eliglustat. It was a randomized, unblended, two-period, crossover study that also utilized screening, evaluation, washout, evaluation, and safety follow-up periods.67 Twelve participants received eliglustat 300 mg under fasting conditions followed by a 6-day washout and a second 300 mg dose on day 7 immediately after a meal. The other 12 participants were randomized to receive the first dose of the drug in the fed state and the second dose in the fasted state. In all three Phase I trials, blood samples were analyzed at pre-dose and post-dose intervals. Safety and tolerability were analyzed by vital signs, hematology, urinalysis, 12-lead electrocardiography, and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.67 No serious adverse effects were reported. Dose-limiting toxicities included nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and mild prolongation of the PR, QRS, and QTc intervals observed in the single-dose group taking eliglustat 10–30 mg/kg. Although no clinically significant cardiac problems were observed at the therapeutic dose of 200 mg or the supratherapeutic dose of 800 mg, patients with a predisposition to arrhythmia should not take eliglustat and patients with cardiovascular disease should take this drug cautiously due to possible mild prolongation of PR, QRS, and QTc intervals. The adverse effects observed due to the increased dosage of eliglustat were transient and resolved without further problems.67 In the trial investigating the effects of food, eliglustat caused diarrhea (8.3%), flatulence (8.3%), and nausea (4.2%).67 Common adverse effects reported from the Phase I trials were nausea (45.8%), headache (25.0%), dizziness (20.8%), constipation (16%), vomiting (16%), and decreased appetite (16%).67 Based on the favorable Phase I results, Phase II trials were initiated in GD1 patients using a dose of 50 or 100 mg twice daily. A Phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm clinical trial was conducted in 28 GD1 patients aged 18–65 years to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eliglustat administered twice daily orally at 50 or 100 mg for 52 weeks.3,68 Inclusion criteria for this study were GBA1 enzyme deficiency, a spleen volume ten times that of normal, thrombocytopenia, and/or anemia. Statistically significant improvements in hemoglobin level (1.62 g/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.18), platelet count (40.3%; 95% CI 23.7–57), spleen volume (−38.5%; 95% CI −43.5, −33.5), liver volume (−17%; 95% CI −21.6, −12.3), and bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (Z score 0.31; 95% CI 0.09–0.53) were observed. A decrease in biomarkers (CT, angiotensin-converting enzyme, PARC/CCL18, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase) of 35%–50% was also achieved. During this trial, four patients withdrawn from the study due to asymptomatic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia detected on day 1 (n=2) and pregnancy during weeks 17 and 26 (n=2).68 A Phase II, multisite, open-label, single-arm clinical study involving the same patients (total 20) and the same group of researchers was conducted for one further year. Statistically significant (P<0.001) improvements were seen in the primary and secondary end points, and in platelet count, hemoglobin level, and spleen and liver volumes.69 Significant increases in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and T score and a decrease in bone marrow infiltration by Gaucher cells were also recorded.69 Nineteen patients continued on the study for 2 further years (a total of 4 years). Fifteen patients received eliglustat 100 mg twice daily, three received 50 mg twice daily, and one received 50 mg twice daily for 3 years then increased to 100 mg twice daily in year 4.70,71 Improvements observed in spleen and liver volume, hemoglobin level, and platelet counts during the 1st and 2nd years of treatment were maintained and extended through the 4 years, demonstrating the long-term efficacy of eliglustat.70,71 The three Phase III clinical trials are known as ENGAGE, ENCORE, and EDGE. Table 3 provides more detailed information on these trials. ENGAGE was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial that recruited 40 patients to evaluate the manifestations of 9 months of treatment with eliglustat in patients with untreated GD1.72 Patients were stratified to receive eliglustat 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily based on their spleen volume (n=20) or placebo (n=20). The primary endpoint was the percent change in spleen volume, and secondary endpoints were change in hemoglobin level and percent changes in liver volume and platelet count from baseline.
Table 3

Summary of eliglustat in Phase III clinical trials

StudyPatientsStudy designOutcomesResults
Cox et al73 ENCORE trial NCT00943111160 GD1 adults who received 3 years of imiglucerase. Only 146 patients completed the trial.R, MN, OL, NIT trial.Eliglustat group (n=106) given 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, then 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg at weeks 2 and 6, depending on their plasma eliglustat.Imiglucerase group (n=54) at patient’s normal dose every 2 weeks.Primary: % change in hematological variable and organ volumes after 12 months.Eliglustat group showed 85% versus imiglucerase group 94% were stable % in hemoglobin concentrations, platelet count, and spleen and liver volumes. Differences between groups were −8.8% (95% CI −17.6, 4.2).
Mistry et al72 ENGAGE trial NCT0089120240 GD1 patients with splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and/or anemia. All completed the trial.R, DB, PCT trial.Patients received eliglustat based on their spleen volumes.Eliglustat (n=20) received 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily or placebo (n=20) for 9 months.Primary: % change in spleen volume from baseline after 9 months.Secondary: % change in liver volume, platelet count, and hemoglobin level.Eliglustat reduced spleen volume by 27.77% (95% CI −32.57, −22.97) versus placebo increase of 2.26% (95% CI −2.54, 7.06); an absolute treatment difference of −30.03% (95% CI −36.82, −23.24; P<0.001).Eliglustat caused reduction in liver volume by 6.64% (95% CI −11.37, −1.91; P=0.007), increase in hemoglobin by 1.22 g/dL (95% CI 0.57–1.88 g/dL; P<0.01), and increase in platelet count by 41.06% (95% CI 23.95–58.17; P<0.01), respectively, versus placebo.
EDGE trial74 NCT01074944171 GD1 adults (older than 18 years).R, MC, MN, DB trial.Eliglustat twice-daily dosing of 50 mg or 100 mg; or once-daily dosing of 100 mg or 200 mg.Primary: number of patients who remain stable after twice-daily versus once-daily dosing.OngoingResults expected August 2015.

Abbreviations: GD1, Gaucher disease type 1; R, randomized; MN, multinational; OL, open-label; NIT, non-inferiority trial; DB, double-blind; PCT, placebo-controlled trial; MC, multicultural; CI, confidence interval.

ENCORE was a randomized, multinational, open-label, Phase III non-inferiority trial that examined the stability of patients who had been on the ERTs imiglucerase or velaglucerase for over 3 years when switched to oral eliglustat. The patients were randomized to receive an infusion of imiglucerase every other week at their usual doses (n=54) or to receive eliglustat 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg twice daily (n=106). The primary endpoint was change in hematological or organ volumes after 12 months of treatment. Eighty-five percent of the patients treated with eliglustat and 94% of those treated with imiglucerase met the primary efficacy endpoint of the study (−8.8%, 95% CI −17.6, 4.2).73 Using the preliminary screening questionnaire, 94% of patients preferred taking oral therapy over intravenous infusion.8 Serious adverse effects reported were hepatocellular carcinoma in 10% of the eliglustat group, cholecystitis, and joint dislocation possibly related to underlying GD. Three patients withdrew from the study due to psychotic disorders or palpitations without clinically relevant electrocardiographic findings. Common adverse effects associated with switching from imiglucerase to eliglustat included diarrhea (5%), arthralgia (4%), fatigue (4%), and headache (4%). Overall, oral eliglustat therapy was found to be non-inferior to imiglucerase.73 Further details of this study are reported in Table 3. The EDGE trial is currently ongoing and has not reported any data to date. It is a randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind trial investigating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of eliglustat in patients with GD1 who have demonstrated clinical stability on eliglustat twice daily.74

Dosing and administration

Eliglustat is dosed according to cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 genotype, whereby patients are classified as extensive metabolizers (EMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), or poor metabolizers (PMs). It is recommended that patients receive a test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for determining CYP2D6 genotype prior to taking eliglustat. CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers may not reach therapeutic efficacy of the drug and a specific dosage cannot be recommended for patients without confirmed CYP2D6 genotype assessment. The recommended dosing of eliglustat is 84 mg twice a day in CYP2D6 EMs and IMs, and 84 mg once daily in CYP2D6 PMs. Caution is required when patients are taking other CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors because this may increase the availability of eliglustat and worsen adverse effects. CYP2D6 EMs and IMs taking strong to moderate CYP2D6 inhibitors need to reduce the dose of eliglustat to 84 mg once daily, and CYP2D6 EMs taking strong to moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors need to reduce the dose to 84 mg once daily. Eliglustat has not been adequately studied in geriatric or pediatric patients. Eliglustat capsules should be swallowed whole, preferably with water, and not crushed, dissolved, or opened. Food does not affect the availability of this drug, but patients should avoid grapefruit juice because it is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Missed doses should not be replaced, but the patient should take the next dose. When switching therapies, eliglustat can be given 24 hours after the last dose of ERT. For additional information on eliglustat, refer to Table 1.

Adverse effects

Common adverse effects (≥10%) of eliglustat included fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhea, back pain, pain in the extremities, and upper abdominal pain. Eliglustat is not recommended for patients with pre-existing cardiac disease or long QT syndrome, or for patients taking class IA or class IIIA antiarrhythmics.

Supportive care for GD

In addition to taking an ERT or SRT, GD patients usually need to take other drugs to alleviate specific disease symptoms such as bone disease, hepatosplenomegaly, bleeding, pulmonary hypertension, seizures, and Parkinsonism. Bone disease usually indicates advanced GD, but susceptibility to fractures, osteopenia, and osteonecrosis can also be a sign of GD in asymptomatic patients.26 Treatment of bone disease with oral bisphosphonates such as alendronate disodium 40 mg/day, calcium 1,500 mg/day, and vitamin D 400 IU/day for 24 months significantly improved bone mineral density and content, and decreased the fracture risk in comparison to patients who took only calcium and vitamin D at the same dosage without oral biphosphonates.75,76 However, alendronate did not improve focal bone lesions (deformity in distal femur, vertebral, pelvic bones), suggesting a more complex osteoclast-mediated mechanism in GD that needs further study. Alendronate at a high dose of 40 mg/day may provide benefit and could be an effective and safe strategy to increase bone mineral density and bone mineral content.75,76 Defects in the platelet, coagulation, and non-corrected and thrombocytopenia coagulation pathways may increase the bleeding risk in GD patients and require constant monitoring.26 Although the majority of GD patients never develop clinical signs of Parkinsonism, those who manifest such symptoms may experience improvement or worsening of their symptoms despite optimal treatment of GD. Due to the severity and complexity of GD, providers need to individualize treatment options for complicated GD, given that few guidelines are available.

Therapeutic costs

The cost of ERTs, not including nurses/doctors who administered the intravenous or other hospital expenses, for imiglucerase is US $1,729 per vial of 400 units, or velaglucerase alfa is US $1,501 per vial of 400 units, or taliglucerase alfa is $700 per vial of 200 units, respectively.77 Patients are generally given 60 units/kg every 2 weeks, so the monthly cost for a 70 kg patient is approximately $36,307 for imiglucerase, $31,521 for velaglucerase alfa, and $29,200 for taliglucerase. The additional cost of administering these drugs by intravenous infusion in hospital should also be considered. The monthly cost of 90 capsules of miglustat is $11,255, while the monthly cost of 56 eliglustat capsules is $24,284. If a patient can take miglustat, the cost of the drug is the cheaper than all the other drugs. Patients taking eliglustat can save from $4,900 to $12,000 monthly, when switching from any of the ERTs. Insurance is not factored into these values.

Conclusion

Eliglustat tartrate is a the newest SRT for use in the treatment of GD1, an autosomal recessive LSD affecting the bone marrow, bone structure, spleen, liver, and lymph node parenchyma. This drug is a potent ceramide analog that works by selectively inhibiting the action of enzyme GLC synthase, causing reduction of endogenous GLC and thus preventing its influx in the lysosome. GLC causes accumulation of Gaucher cells responsible for destruction of bone, enlargement of the spleen and liver, abnormalities in the lung, and anemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Common adverse effects (≥10%) include fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhea, back pain, pain in the extremities, and upper abdominal pain. The recommended dosing of eliglustat is 84 mg twice a day in CYP2D6 EMs and IMs, and 84 mg once daily in CYP2D6 PMs. Eliglustat is not recommended for patients with pre-existing cardiac disease or long QT syndrome, or patients taking class IA or class IIIA antiarrhythmics. Caution is needed in patients taking strong CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Based on its safety, efficacy, convenience, and cost-effectiveness, eliglustat tartrate provides a better option than all other available drugs for patients with GD1, who usually require lifetime treatment.
  65 in total

Review 1.  Structure and function of the mannose 6-phosphate/insulinlike growth factor II receptors.

Authors:  S Kornfeld
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Plasma level of the macrophage-derived soluble CD163 is increased and positively correlates with severity in Gaucher's disease.

Authors:  Holger Jon Møller; Maaike de Fost; Hans Aerts; Carla Hollak; Søren Kragh Moestrup
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Epidemiology and natural history of Gaucher's disease.

Authors:  Atul Mehta
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.487

Review 4.  Eliglustat tartrate, an orally active glucocerebroside synthase inhibitor for the potential treatment of Gaucher disease and other lysosomal storage diseases.

Authors:  Timothy M Cox
Journal:  Curr Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2010-10

5.  CCL18: a urinary marker of Gaucher cell burden in Gaucher patients.

Authors:  Rolf G Boot; Marri Verhoek; Mirjam Langeveld; G Herma Renkema; Carla E M Hollak; Jan J Weening; Wilma E Donker-Koopman; Johanna E Groener; Johannes M F G Aerts
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Type 1 Gaucher disease: significant disease manifestations in "asymptomatic" homozygotes.

Authors:  Manisha Balwani; Laura Fuerstman; Ruth Kornreich; Lisa Edelmann; Robert J Desnick
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-13

7.  The occurrence of two immunologically distinguishable beta-glucocerebrosidases in human spleen.

Authors:  J M Aerts; W E Donker-Koopman; M K van der Vliet; L M Jonsson; E I Ginns; G J Murray; J A Barranger; J M Tager; A W Schram
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1985-08-01

Review 8.  The design and clinical development of inhibitors of glycosphingolipid synthesis: will invention be the mother of necessity?

Authors:  James A Shayman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2013

9.  Assignment of the gene coding for human beta-glucocerebrosidase to the region q21-q31 of chromosome 1 using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  R A Barneveld; W Keijzer; F P Tegelaers; E I Ginns; A Geurts van Kessel; R O Brady; J A Barranger; J M Tager; H Galjaard; A Westerveld; A J Reuser
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Gaucher disease: clinical profile and therapeutic developments.

Authors:  Timothy M Cox
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-12-06
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Sphingolipids and phospholipids in insulin resistance and related metabolic disorders.

Authors:  Peter J Meikle; Scott A Summers
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Intravenous infusion of iPSC-derived neural precursor cells increases acid β-glucosidase function in the brain and lessens the neuronopathic phenotype in a mouse model of Gaucher disease.

Authors:  Yanyan Peng; Benjamin Liou; Venette Inskeep; Rachel Blackwood; Christopher N Mayhew; Gregory A Grabowski; Ying Sun
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Progress and potential of non-inhibitory small molecule chaperones for the treatment of Gaucher disease and its implications for Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Olive Jung; Samarjit Patnaik; Juan Marugan; Ellen Sidransky; Wendy Westbroek
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Pharmacotherapy of Gaucher Disease: Current and Future Options.

Authors:  Lunawati L Bennett; Chris Fellner
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-05

5.  Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for Gaucher disease in pediatric populations.

Authors:  Richard Sam; Emory Ryan; Emily Daykin; Ellen Sidransky
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.103

6.  Drug-Drug Interactions Of Amiodarone And Quinidine On The Pharmacokinetics Of Eliglustat In Rats.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; Haiyun Wang; Youyan Zhong; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Total Synthesis of Eliglustat via Diastereoselective Amination of Chiral para-Methoxycinnamyl Benzyl Ether.

Authors:  Younggyu Kong; Pulla Reddy Boggu; Gi Min Park; Yeon Su Kim; Seong Hwan An; In Su Kim; Young Hoon Jung
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  NDST1 Preferred Promoter Confirmation and Identification of Corresponding Transcriptional Inhibitors as Substrate Reduction Agents for Multiple Mucopolysaccharidosis Disorders.

Authors:  Ilona Tkachyova; Xiaolian Fan; Anne-Marie LamHonWah; Bohdana Fedyshyn; Ingrid Tein; Don J Mahuran; Andreas Schulze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.