Literature DB >> 26344799

DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines.

G-J Brandon-Mong1, H-M Gan2, K-W Sing1, P-S Lee1, P-E Lim3, J-J Wilson1.   

Abstract

Metabarcoding, the coupling of DNA-based species identification and high-throughput sequencing, offers enormous promise for arthropod biodiversity studies but factors such as cost, speed and ease-of-use of bioinformatic pipelines, crucial for making the leapt from demonstration studies to a real-world application, have not yet been adequately addressed. Here, four published and one newly designed primer sets were tested across a diverse set of 80 arthropod species, representing 11 orders, to establish optimal protocols for Illumina-based metabarcoding of tropical Malaise trap samples. Two primer sets which showed the highest amplification success with individual specimen polymerase chain reaction (PCR, 98%) were used for bulk PCR and Illumina MiSeq sequencing. The sequencing outputs were subjected to both manual and simple metagenomics quality control and filtering pipelines. We obtained acceptable detection rates after bulk PCR and high-throughput sequencing (80-90% of input species) but analyses were complicated by putative heteroplasmic sequences and contamination. The manual pipeline produced similar or better outputs to the simple metagenomics pipeline (1.4 compared with 0.5 expected:unexpected Operational Taxonomic Units). Our study suggests that metabarcoding is slowly becoming as cheap, fast and easy as conventional DNA barcoding, and that Malaise trap metabarcoding may soon fulfill its potential, providing a thermometer for biodiversity.

Keywords:  Arthropoda; COI; Illumina MiSeq; Malaise trap; biodiversity; high-throughput sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26344799     DOI: 10.1017/S0007485315000681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA.

Authors:  Zeshu Yu; Shin-Ichi Ito; Marty Kwok-Shing Wong; Susumu Yoshizawa; Jun Inoue; Sachihiko Itoh; Ryuji Yukami; Kazuo Ishikawa; Chenying Guo; Minoru Ijichi; Susumu Hyodo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  DNA Barcoding for Identification of Sugarcane Borers in China.

Authors:  J- D Wang; W- Z Wang; Z- L Lin; A Ali; H- Y Fu; M- T Huang; S- J Gao; R Wang
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Metabarcoding Malaise traps and soil eDNA reveals seasonal and local arthropod diversity shifts.

Authors:  Ameli Kirse; Sarah J Bourlat; Kathrin Langen; Vera G Fonseca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Citizen Science: The First Peninsular Malaysia Butterfly Count.

Authors:  John-James Wilson; Shi-Wei Jisming-See; Guo-Jie Brandon-Mong; Aik-Hean Lim; Voon-Ching Lim; Ping-Shin Lee; Kong-Wah Sing
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2015-12-11

6.  A DNA barcode library for ground beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Germany: The genus Bembidion Latreille, 1802 and allied taxa.

Authors:  Michael J Raupach; Karsten Hannig; Jérome Morinière; Lars Hendrich
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 7.  Advancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Scott E Miller; Axel Hausmann; Winnie Hallwachs; Daniel H Janzen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Arthropod and oligochaete assemblages from grasslands of the southern Kenai Peninsula, Alaska.

Authors:  Matthew L Bowser; John M Morton; John Delton Hanson; Dawn R Magness; Mallory Okuly
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2017-01-12

9.  Molecular gut content analysis indicates the inter- and intra-guild predation patterns of spiders in conventionally managed vegetable fields.

Authors:  Hafiz Sohaib Ahmed Saqib; Pingping Liang; Minsheng You; Geoff M Gurr
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The utility of DNA metabarcoding for studying the response of arthropod diversity and composition to land-use change in the tropics.

Authors:  Kingsly Chuo Beng; Kyle W Tomlinson; Xian Hui Shen; Yann Surget-Groba; Alice C Hughes; Richard T Corlett; J W Ferry Slik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.