Alan T Piper1. 1. Universität Flensburg, Internationales Institut für Management und ökonomische Bildung, Munketoft 3B, 24937 Flensburg, Germany. Electronic address: alan.piper@uni-flensburg.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Much of the work within economics attempting to understand the relationship between age and well-being has focused on the U-shape, whether it exists and, more recently, potential reasons for its existence. This paper focuses on one part of the lifecycle rather than the whole: young people. This focus offers a better understanding of the age-well-being relationship for young people, and helps with increasing general understanding regarding the U-shape itself. METHOD: The empirical estimations employ both static and dynamic panel estimations, with the latter preferred for several reasons. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The empirical results are in line with the U-shape, and the results from the dynamic analysis indicate that this result is a lifecycle effect.
INTRODUCTION: Much of the work within economics attempting to understand the relationship between age and well-being has focused on the U-shape, whether it exists and, more recently, potential reasons for its existence. This paper focuses on one part of the lifecycle rather than the whole: young people. This focus offers a better understanding of the age-well-being relationship for young people, and helps with increasing general understanding regarding the U-shape itself. METHOD: The empirical estimations employ both static and dynamic panel estimations, with the latter preferred for several reasons. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The empirical results are in line with the U-shape, and the results from the dynamic analysis indicate that this result is a lifecycle effect.