Literature DB >> 26343866

Multi-dimensional reliability assessment of fractal signature analysis in an outpatient sports medicine population.

Mohamed Jarraya1, Ali Guermazi2, Jingbo Niu3, Jeffrey Duryea4, John A Lynch5, Frank W Roemer6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study has been to test reproducibility of fractal signature analysis (FSA) in a young, active patient population taking into account several parameters including intra- and inter-reader placement of regions of interest (ROIs) as well as various aspects of projection geometry. In total, 685 patients were included (135 athletes and 550 non-athletes, 18-36 years old). Regions of interest (ROI) were situated beneath the medial tibial plateau. The reproducibility of texture parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Multi-dimensional assessment included: (1) anterior-posterior (A.P.) vs. posterior-anterior (P.A.) (Lyon-Schuss technique) views on 102 knees; (2) unilateral (single knee) vs. bilateral (both knees) acquisition on 27 knees (acquisition technique otherwise identical; same A.P. or P.A. view); (3) repetition of the same image acquisition on 46 knees (same A.P. or P.A. view, and same unitlateral or bilateral acquisition); and (4) intra- and inter-reader reliability with repeated placement of the ROIs in the subchondral bone area on 99 randomly chosen knees. ICC values on the reproducibility of texture parameters for A.P. vs. P.A. image acquisitions for horizontal and vertical dimensions combined were 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.74) ranging from 0.47 to 0.81 for the different dimensions. For unilateral vs. bilateral image acquisitions, the ICCs were 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82) ranging from 0.55 to 0.88. For the repetition of the identical view, the ICCs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84) ranging from 0.67 to 0.85. Intra-reader reliability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94) and inter-observer reliability was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99). A decrease in reliability was observed with increasing voxel sizes. Our study confirms excellent intra- and inter-reader reliability for FSA, however, results seem to be affected by acquisition technique, which has not been previously recognized.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fractal signature analysis; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Radiography; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343866     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  3 in total

1.  Subchondral trabecular bone integrity changes following ACL injury and reconstruction: a cohort study with a nested, matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  C E Birch; K S Mensch; M J Desarno; B D Beynnon; T W Tourville
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Bone Structure Analysis of the Radius Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MRI: Relevance of Technical Parameters and Comparison with 3T MRI and Radiography.

Authors:  Mohamed Jarraya; Rafael Heiss; Jeffrey Duryea; Armin M Nagel; John A Lynch; Ali Guermazi; Marc-André Weber; Andreas Arkudas; Raymund E Horch; Michael Uder; Frank W Roemer
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Jukka Hirvasniemi; Jérôme Thevenot; Ali Guermazi; Jana Podlipská; Frank W Roemer; Miika T Nieminen; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.